← Air events

Stagnant pollution mixture Possible

2009-11-09 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA stagnant mixed-pollution episode

November 9, 2009

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 54.2 µg/m³ near New York across 1 covered metro home to 20 million people.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 1.9 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 38 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Stagnant pollution mixture”

An exact-date EPA chemical-speciation sample reconstructed 37.6 micrograms per cubic meter of PM2.5, close enough to the 54.2 event peak to describe the episode. Secondary inorganic aerosol contributed about 48% and organic plus elemental carbon about 43%, while the metro fingerprint showed simultaneous PM2.5 and combustion-tracer increases. Nearby surface observations recorded haze or mist during ten hours and calm or light wind during nine hours. Together these data support accumulation of a mixed anthropogenic aerosol, but they do not identify a dominant source sector.

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

NOAA/NWS surface observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Nov 9, 2009 hypothesis

New York/LaGuardia surface conditions on 2009-11-09

New York/LaGuardia, 7.1 km from the target monitor, reported 3 haze hour(s) and 7 mist hour(s). Winds were calm for 8 hours and at or below 3 knots for 9 hours.

Inference, not direct attribution

exact_composition_haze_multimonitor_mixture_possible.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Stagnant pollution mixture

    EPA's exact-date CSN sample at site 36-005-0110 reconstructed 37.6 µg/m³ of PM2.5. Sulfate plus nitrate contributed 48%; organic matter plus elemental carbon contributed 43%.

    View supporting source ↗
    Documented
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The transport path has not been reconstructed

    The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.

    Research gap
  3. 3

    Local response

    54.2 µg/m³ near New York

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.5 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Stagnant pollution mixture” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA

Monitor comparison window 2009-11-06 to 2009-11-12 · PM2.5 target: MORRISANIA

6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 34.7 µg/m³

410% above nearby days

Air movement 172 Degrees Compass

About the same as surrounding days

PM10 49 µg/m³

No adjacent-day comparison

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 34.7 µg/m³

410% higher than surrounding days

Before6.80 µg/m³ Event34.7 µg/m³ After5.30 µg/m³
26 monitors · 24 HOUR
PM10 49 µg/m³

No adjacent-day comparison

Before Event49 µg/m³ After
2 monitors · 24 HOUR
Carbon monoxide 1.12 ppm

146% higher than surrounding days

Before0.454 ppm Event1.12 ppm After0.283 ppm
12 monitors · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 43.8 ppb

115% higher than surrounding days

Before20.3 ppb Event43.8 ppb After12.3 ppb
11 monitors · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 5.04 ppb

32% higher than surrounding days

Before3.91 ppb Event5.04 ppb After1.17 ppb
14 monitors · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.026 ppm

60% higher than surrounding days

Before0.015 ppm Event0.026 ppm After0.024 ppm
22 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity 81.6 %

19% higher than surrounding days

Pressure 1019 Millibars

About the same as surrounding days

Temperature 54 °F

About the same as surrounding days

Wind 172 Degrees Compass

About the same as surrounding days

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Views from the selected metro

Camera views near

Browse the camera map →

Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA 54.2 µg/m³ 2.5 Nov 9, 2009 #23 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

3 retained sources

Official record

New York/LaGuardia surface conditions on 2009-11-09

NOAA/NWS surface observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet

New York/LaGuardia, 7.1 km from the target monitor, reported 3 haze hour(s) and 7 mist hour(s). Winds were calm for 8 hours and at or below 3 knots for 9 hours.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

The airport and regulatory pollution monitors are nearby but not co-located.

Official record

New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA multi-monitor pollution fingerprint on 2009-11-09

U.S. EPA AirData

EPA observations show event-day PM2.5 elevated across 26 FRM monitoring series and 25 hourly series. Carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide also rose sharply relative to the surrounding comparison windows, with PM10 and sulfur dioxide elevated where available.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

The pollutant products were not necessarily measured at the same sites, so the fingerprint describes the metro episode rather than a single collocated source profile.

Official record

New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA PM2.5 composition on 2009-11-09

U.S. EPA AirData Chemical Speciation Network

EPA's exact-date CSN sample at site 36-005-0110 reconstructed 37.6 µg/m³ of PM2.5. Sulfate plus nitrate contributed 48%; organic matter plus elemental carbon contributed 43%.

What it supports

A retained source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.

Limit

Chemical composition describes the sampled aerosol mixture but does not identify a named source, facility, or origin region.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.