2001-05-04 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH and Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT dust episode
May 4, 2001
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 55.1 µg/m³ near Bridgeport across
2 covered metros home to 6.0 million people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 1.6 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 9.7 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Dust”
A peer-reviewed New England study documents three statistically extreme Asian-dust events across the entire northeastern United States between April 18 and May 13, 2001, a period containing the Boston and Bridgeport observation. The accessible source does not isolate May 4 as one of the event peaks, so the attribution is possible rather than likely.
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
Journal of Geophysical Research / University of New Hampshire · Jan 10, 2004hypothesis
The study documents three chemically verified Asian-dust events across the entire northeastern United States between April 18 and May 13, 2001, with additional anthropogenic sulfate, nitrate, carbon monoxide, and elemental carbon entrained during transport.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
The catalog has a grouping hypothesis, but no retained source directly establishes the proposed cause.
Open question
2
Air-mass movement
The transport path has not been reconstructed
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
55.1 µg/m³ near Bridgeport
EPA monitors recorded the event across 2 metros.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.5 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Dust” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH
Monitor comparison window 2001-05-01 to 2001-05-07 · PM2.5 target: BOSTON CITY SQUARE
5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse40.1 µg/m³
142% above nearby days
Carbon monoxide0.596 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.540.1 µg/m³
142% higher than surrounding days
Before22.4 µg/m³ Event40.1 µg/m³ After15.7 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.596 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.683 ppm Event0.596 ppm After0.317 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide25.2 ppb
About the same as surrounding days
Before33.6 ppb Event25.2 ppb After8.10 ppb
Sulfur dioxide4.42 ppb
About the same as surrounding days
Before5.88 ppb Event4.42 ppb After3.08 ppb
Ozone0.061 ppm
46% higher than surrounding days
Before0.053 ppm Event0.061 ppm After0.034 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity41.8 %
16% higher than surrounding days
Pressure1011 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature76.7 °F
17% higher than surrounding days
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT
Monitor comparison window 2001-05-01 to 2001-05-07
5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse38.9 µg/m³
108% above nearby days
Carbon monoxide1.06 ppm
8% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.538.9 µg/m³
108% higher than surrounding days
Before18.7 µg/m³ Event38.9 µg/m³ After5.90 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide1.06 ppm
8% higher than surrounding days
Before1.03 ppm Event1.06 ppm After0.573 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide33.7 ppb
5% higher than surrounding days
Before33.8 ppb Event33.7 ppb After14.8 ppb
Sulfur dioxide4.93 ppb
About the same as surrounding days
Before6.37 ppb Event4.93 ppb After1.24 ppb
Ozone0.062 ppm
53% higher than surrounding days
Before0.040 ppm Event0.062 ppm After0.033 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity55.2 °F
22% higher than surrounding days
Temperature70.4 °F
6% higher than surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
1 retained source
Scientific research
Asian dust storm events of spring 2001 and associated pollutants observed in New England by the AIRMAP monitoring network
Journal of Geophysical Research / University of New Hampshire
The study documents three chemically verified Asian-dust events across the entire northeastern United States between April 18 and May 13, 2001, with additional anthropogenic sulfate, nitrate, carbon monoxide, and elemental carbon entrained during transport.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The accessible abstract brackets May 4 within the study period but does not identify that date as an event peak.
What remains uncertain
The date match is within a documented multi-event study period rather than an exact-day attribution, so confidence is capped at possible.
Status and provenance
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.