Daily PM2.5 peaked at 68.5 µg/m³ near Seattle across
2 covered metros home to 6.7 million people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 2.5 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 17 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Wildfire smoke”
Qualified frozen evidence supports wildfire smoke as the broad cause for this time-bounded episode.
EPA monitor flagEPA attached an exceptional-event qualifier to the affected samples. The agency flagged the measurement itself; no separate agency record describes the event.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Aug 3, 2017official
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IT, Wildfire-U. S.) on 165 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2017-08-03, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality · Aug 2, 2017official
The Oregon DEQ advisory covering August 2–8 identified intrusions of wildfire smoke, active wildfires, and stagnant conditions as contributing to particulate pollution in the Portland–Vancouver area during the event window.
NOAA/NCEI Storm Events Database · Aug 2, 2017corroborates
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IT, Wildfire-U. S.) on 165 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2017-08-03, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official…
The Oregon DEQ advisory covering August 2–8 identified intrusions of wildfire smoke, active wildfires, and stagnant conditions as contributing to particulate pollution in the Portland–Vancouver area during the event window.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Wildfire smoke” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA
Monitor comparison window 2017-07-31 to 2017-08-06 · PM2.5 target: Portland - SE Lafayette St (SEL)
5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse56 µg/m³
323% above nearby days
Air movement255 Degrees Compass
About the same as surrounding days
Carbon monoxide0.540 ppm
178% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.556 µg/m³
323% higher than surrounding days
Before13 µg/m³ Event56 µg/m³ After13.3 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.540 ppm
178% higher than surrounding days
Before0.194 ppm Event0.540 ppm After0.144 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide19.8 ppb
65% higher than surrounding days
Before12.4 ppb Event19.8 ppb After6.89 ppb
Sulfur dioxide1.22 ppb
133% higher than surrounding days
Before0.825 ppb Event1.22 ppb After0.304 ppb
Ozone0.063 ppm
57% higher than surrounding days
Before0.054 ppm Event0.063 ppm After0.033 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity40.9 %
5% lower than surrounding days
Pressure1004 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature84.5 °F
8% higher than surrounding days
Wind255 Degrees Compass
About the same as surrounding days
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
Monitor comparison window 2017-07-31 to 2017-08-06 · PM2.5 target: PUYALLUP - 128TH ST
5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse56.9 µg/m³
200% above nearby days
Air movement3.08 kt
About the same as surrounding days
Carbon monoxide0.622 ppm
35% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.556.9 µg/m³
200% higher than surrounding days
Before17.1 µg/m³ Event56.9 µg/m³ After19 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.622 ppm
35% higher than surrounding days
Before0.462 ppm Event0.622 ppm After0.327 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide33.5 ppb
52% higher than surrounding days
Before22.1 ppb Event33.5 ppb After19.7 ppb
Sulfur dioxide0.618 ppb
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.409 ppb Event0.618 ppb After0.673 ppb
Ozone0.056 ppm
48% higher than surrounding days
Before0.038 ppm Event0.056 ppm After0.035 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity52.4 %
7% lower than surrounding days
Pressure1000 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature76.9 °F
7% higher than surrounding days
Wind3.08 kt
About the same as surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Aug 3, 2017officialgovernment
EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IT, Wildfire-U. S.) on 165 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2017-08-03, identifying wildfire smoke as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.
Oregon Department of Environmental Quality · Aug 2, 2017officialgovernment
The Oregon DEQ advisory covering August 2–8 identified intrusions of wildfire smoke, active wildfires, and stagnant conditions as contributing to particulate pollution in the Portland–Vancouver area during the event window.
What remains uncertain
AQS qualifiers are submitting-agency causal flags and do not by themselves establish EPA concurrence.
The evidence resolves the broad cause but does not require a named fire, facility, or incident.
The retained official evidence directly covers Portland-Vancouver; it does not independently establish the Seattle portion.
Status and provenance
EPA monitor flagEPA attached an exceptional-event qualifier to the affected samples. The agency flagged the measurement itself; no separate agency record describes the event.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.