← Air events

Fireworks EPA monitor flag

Fireworks episode, 2017-12-31 through 2018-01-02

December 31, 2017 to January 2, 2018

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 111 µg/m³ near Los Angeles across 3 covered metros home to 19 million people. 1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 4.1 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 75 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Fireworks”

Qualified frozen evidence supports fireworks as the broad cause for this time-bounded episode and supports grouping 2 overlapping event records.

EPA monitor flag EPA attached an exceptional-event qualifier to the affected samples. The agency flagged the measurement itself; no separate agency record describes the event.

U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jan 1, 2018 official

AQS PM2.5 qualifier IH — Fireworks.

EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IH, Fireworks.) on 41 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2018-01-01, identifying fireworks as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.

U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jan 2, 2018 official

AQS PM2.5 qualifier IH — Fireworks.

EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IH, Fireworks.) on 27 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2018-01-02, identifying fireworks as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.

U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jan 2, 2018 official

AQS PM2.5 qualifier IE — Demolition.

EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IE, Demolition.) on 1 PM2.5 sample in the candidate CBSA on 2018-01-02, identifying demolition as affecting the sample. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Sequence: Los Angeles (Jan 1) → Riverside (Jan 1) → Bakersfield (Jan 2)

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Fireworks

    EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IH, Fireworks.) on 41 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2018-01-01, identifying fireworks as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag,…

    View supporting source ↗
    Documented
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The transport path has not been reconstructed

    The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.

    Research gap
  3. 3

    Local response

    111 µg/m³ near Los Angeles

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 3 metros. The peak daily concentration is roughly 5.0 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Fireworks” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA

Monitor comparison window 2017-12-29 to 2018-01-05 · PM2.5 target: Long Beach-Route 710 Near Road

6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 60.9 µg/m³

88% above nearby days

Air movement 1.60 kt

About the same as surrounding days

PM10 57.5 µg/m³

28% higher than surrounding days

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 60.9 µg/m³

88% higher than surrounding days

Before30.6 µg/m³ Event60.9 µg/m³ After23.6 µg/m³
11 monitors · 24 HOUR
PM10 57.5 µg/m³

28% higher than surrounding days

Before42 µg/m³ Event57.5 µg/m³ After43 µg/m³
3 monitors · 24-HR BLK AVG
Carbon monoxide 0.938 ppm

8% higher than surrounding days

Before0.779 ppm Event0.938 ppm After0.858 ppm
16 monitors · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 30 ppb

12% lower than surrounding days

Before32.3 ppb Event30 ppb After35.8 ppb
16 monitors · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 0.713 ppb

14% lower than surrounding days

Before0.917 ppb Event0.713 ppb After0.908 ppb
3 monitors · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.017 ppm

32% higher than surrounding days

Before0.016 ppm Event0.017 ppm After0.011 ppm
16 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity 69.3 %

13% higher than surrounding days

Pressure 1009 Millibars

About the same as surrounding days

Temperature 59.3 °F

About the same as surrounding days

Wind 1.60 kt

About the same as surrounding days

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Views from the selected metro

Camera views near

Browse the camera map →

Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA 111 µg/m³ 5.0 Jan 1, 2018 #5 of its top days
Bakersfield, CA 100.9 µg/m³ 4.6 Jan 2, 2018 #25 of its top days
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 89.1 µg/m³ 4.0 Jan 1, 2018 #14 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

EPA AQS monitor qualifier 5

  • AQS PM2.5 qualifier IH — Fireworks.

    U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jan 1, 2018 official government

    EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IH, Fireworks.) on 41 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2018-01-01, identifying fireworks as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.

  • AQS PM2.5 qualifier IH — Fireworks.

    U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jan 2, 2018 official government

    EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IH, Fireworks.) on 27 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2018-01-02, identifying fireworks as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.

  • AQS PM2.5 qualifier IE — Demolition.

    U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jan 2, 2018 official government

    EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IE, Demolition.) on 1 PM2.5 sample in the candidate CBSA on 2018-01-02, identifying demolition as affecting the sample. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.

  • AQS PM2.5 qualifier IH — Fireworks.

    U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jan 1, 2018 official government

    EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IH, Fireworks.) on 41 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2018-01-01, identifying fireworks as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.

  • AQS PM2.5 qualifier IH — Fireworks.

    U.S. EPA Air Quality System and the submitting air monitoring agency · Jan 2, 2018 official government

    EPA AQS carries an agency-submitted informational qualifier (IH, Fireworks.) on 36 PM2.5 samples in the candidate CBSA on 2018-01-02, identifying fireworks as affecting the samples. An informational qualifier is an official submitting-agency flag, not a request for exclusion or an EPA-concurred determination.

Agency and publisher pages 1

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

EPA monitor flag EPA attached an exceptional-event qualifier to the affected samples. The agency flagged the measurement itself; no separate agency record describes the event.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.