← Air events

Dust Documented

Dust episode, 2014-07-25

July 25, 2014

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 29.8 µg/m³ near Tucson across 1 covered metro home to 1.1 million people. 1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 1.1 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 1.2 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Dust”

Qualified frozen evidence supports dust as the broad cause for this time-bounded episode.

Documented An agency or publisher page assesses this cause, without an agency record naming the event or an EPA qualifier on the data.

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality official

Cracking the AQ Code, Volume 3, Issue 6

ADEQ documents the July 25, 2014 southern Arizona dust event: thunderstorm outflows pushed dust north into Arizona, and the event produced a rare summertime particulate exceedance at Nogales. This supports a regional dust event but does not quantify its contribution at Tucson's monitor.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Dust

    ADEQ documents the July 25, 2014 southern Arizona dust event: thunderstorm outflows pushed dust north into Arizona, and the event produced a rare summertime particulate exceedance at Nogales. This supports a regional dust event but does not quantify…

    View supporting source ↗
    Documented
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The transport path has not been reconstructed

    The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.

    Research gap
  3. 3

    Local response

    29.8 µg/m³ near Tucson

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 1.4 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Dust” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Tucson, AZ

Monitor comparison window 2014-07-22 to 2014-07-28 · PM2.5 target: Saguaro NP

5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 29.9 µg/m³

508% above nearby days

Air movement 4.30 kt

18% lower than surrounding days

PM10 170 µg/m³

578% higher than surrounding days

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 29.9 µg/m³

508% higher than surrounding days

Before4.92 µg/m³ Event29.9 µg/m³ After3.71 µg/m³
1 monitor · 1 HOUR
PM10 170 µg/m³

578% higher than surrounding days

Before25 µg/m³ Event170 µg/m³ After15 µg/m³
4 monitors · 24-HR BLK AVG
Carbon monoxide 0.100 ppm

About the same as surrounding days

Before0.113 ppm Event0.100 ppm After0.100 ppm
3 monitors · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 5.48 ppb

About the same as surrounding days

Before4.56 ppb Event5.48 ppb After5.75 ppb
2 monitors · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.040 ppm

12% lower than surrounding days

Before0.044 ppm Event0.040 ppm After0.050 ppm
8 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity 46.8 %

17% higher than surrounding days

Temperature 85.9 °F

About the same as surrounding days

Wind 4.30 kt

18% lower than surrounding days

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Tucson, AZ 29.8 µg/m³ 1.4 Jul 25, 2014 #10 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

Agency and publisher pages 1

  • Cracking the AQ Code, Volume 3, Issue 6

    Arizona Department of Environmental Quality official government

    ADEQ documents the July 25, 2014 southern Arizona dust event: thunderstorm outflows pushed dust north into Arizona, and the event produced a rare summertime particulate exceedance at Nogales. This supports a regional dust event but does not quantify its contribution at Tucson's monitor.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Documented An agency or publisher page assesses this cause, without an agency record naming the event or an EPA qualifier on the data.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.