← Air events

Wildfire smoke Likely

2022-03-04 Tulsa, OK wildfire-smoke episode

March 4, 2022

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 54 µg/m³ near Tulsa across 1 covered metro home to 1.1 million people. 1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 2.0 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 2.1 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Wildfire smoke”

A contemporaneous Tulsa report directly attributes that morning's haze, smoke, and unhealthy local air quality to wildfires across Green Country whose smoke was being carried through the area by southerly winds.

Likely Applicable reporting or a supported inference makes this the best current causal explanation.

KJRH 2 News Oklahoma · Mar 4, 2022 corroborates

Where is that smoke coming from in Green Country?

KJRH reported hazy, smoky conditions and unhealthy air in the Tulsa metro on March 4, attributing them to Green Country wildfires and southerly winds carrying smoke through the area.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Wildfire smoke

    KJRH reported hazy, smoky conditions and unhealthy air in the Tulsa metro on March 4, attributing them to Green Country wildfires and southerly winds carrying smoke through the area.

    View supporting source ↗
    Documented
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The transport path has not been reconstructed

    The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.

    Research gap
  3. 3

    Local response

    54 µg/m³ near Tulsa

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.5 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Wildfire smoke” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Tulsa, OK

Monitor comparison window 2022-03-01 to 2022-03-07 · PM2.5 target: TULSA CENTRAL

6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 51.9 µg/m³

365% above nearby days

Air movement 5.64 kt

12% higher than surrounding days

PM10 73 µg/m³

97% higher than surrounding days

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 51.9 µg/m³

365% higher than surrounding days

Before11.2 µg/m³ Event51.9 µg/m³ After9.38 µg/m³
2 monitors · 1 HOUR
PM10 73 µg/m³

97% higher than surrounding days

Before41 µg/m³ Event73 µg/m³ After16 µg/m³
1 monitor · 24-HR BLK AVG
Carbon monoxide 0.332 ppm

About the same as surrounding days

Before0.390 ppm Event0.332 ppm After0.168 ppm
1 monitor · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 9.77 ppb

About the same as surrounding days

Before20.3 ppb Event9.77 ppb After2.77 ppb
1 monitor · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 0.898 ppb

137% higher than surrounding days

Before0.486 ppb Event0.898 ppb After0.008 ppb
2 monitors · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.049 ppm

About the same as surrounding days

Before0.055 ppm Event0.049 ppm After0.028 ppm
5 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity 51 %

About the same as surrounding days

Temperature 62.5 °F

About the same as surrounding days

Wind 5.64 kt

12% higher than surrounding days

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Tulsa, OK 54 µg/m³ 2.5 Mar 4, 2022 #3 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

1 retained source

News report

Where is that smoke coming from in Green Country?

KJRH 2 News Oklahoma

KJRH reported hazy, smoky conditions and unhealthy air in the Tulsa metro on March 4, attributing them to Green Country wildfires and southerly winds carrying smoke through the area.

What it supports

A retained source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.

Limit

The report does not identify one contributing fire or quantify the wildfire share of Tulsa's daily PM2.5.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Likely Applicable reporting or a supported inference makes this the best current causal explanation.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.