← Air events

Wildfire smoke Possible

2017-03-21 Tulsa, OK wildfire-smoke episode

March 21, 2017

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 35.9 µg/m³ near Tulsa across 1 covered metro home to 1.1 million people.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 1.2 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 1.3 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Wildfire smoke”

NOAA observed smoke from multiple eastern Oklahoma fires during the exact overnight window, but did not establish surface impact at the Tulsa monitor.

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

NOAA Satellite Services Division hypothesis

Smoke analysis through 0211 UTC March 21, 2017

NOAA analysts reported several large fires in eastern Oklahoma producing light smoke plumes moving northeast into southern Missouri through 0211 UTC March 21.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Source not directly documented

    The catalog has a grouping hypothesis, but no retained source directly establishes the proposed cause.

    Open question
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    Transport into the affected region is documented

    NOAA analysts reported several large fires in eastern Oklahoma producing light smoke plumes moving northeast into southern Missouri through 0211 UTC March 21.

    View transport source ↗
    Documented
  3. 3

    Local response

    35.9 µg/m³ near Tulsa

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 1.6 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Wildfire smoke” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Tulsa, OK

Monitor comparison window 2017-03-18 to 2017-03-24 · PM2.5 target: Glenpool

5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 34.6 µg/m³

180% above nearby days

Air movement 5.22 kt

14% lower than surrounding days

Carbon monoxide 0.378 ppm

47% higher than surrounding days

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 34.6 µg/m³

180% higher than surrounding days

Before16.9 µg/m³ Event34.6 µg/m³ After11.2 µg/m³
2 monitors · 1 HOUR
Carbon monoxide 0.378 ppm

47% higher than surrounding days

Before0.256 ppm Event0.378 ppm After0.242 ppm
1 monitor · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 9.21 ppb

47% higher than surrounding days

Before6.43 ppb Event9.21 ppb After4.85 ppb
1 monitor · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 0.576 ppb

9% lower than surrounding days

Before0.377 ppb Event0.576 ppb After0.946 ppb
4 monitors · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.044 ppm

8% higher than surrounding days

Before0.041 ppm Event0.044 ppm After0.041 ppm
5 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity 49.8 %

About the same as surrounding days

Temperature 69 °F

About the same as surrounding days

Wind 5.22 kt

14% lower than surrounding days

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Tulsa, OK 35.9 µg/m³ 1.6 Mar 21, 2017 #21 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

1 retained source

Official record

Smoke analysis through 0211 UTC March 21, 2017

NOAA Satellite Services Division

NOAA analysts reported several large fires in eastern Oklahoma producing light smoke plumes moving northeast into southern Missouri through 0211 UTC March 21.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

The analysis does not distinguish wildfire from other wildland fire or prove ground-level smoke in Tulsa.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.