NASA Earth Observatory · Jun 30, 2003 hypothesis
Haze over the Atlantic Seaboard — June 26, 2003
NASA satellite observations show a broad haze plume over the eastern United States on June 26 and elevated carbon monoxide associated with that haze.
Wildfire smoke Possible
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 62.1 µg/m³ near Virginia Beach across 4 covered metros home to 5.3 million people. 3 metros placed a top-ten day in their record.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 3.1 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 16 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.
Why we think this happened
NASA observed a thick Atlantic-seaboard haze plume on June 24 that it said might contain Canadian wildfire smoke, then documented persistent haze with elevated carbon monoxide over the eastern United States on June 26. The temporal and regional match supports wildfire smoke only as a possible contributor, not a definitive attribution.
Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
NASA Earth Observatory · Jun 30, 2003 hypothesis
NASA satellite observations show a broad haze plume over the eastern United States on June 26 and elevated carbon monoxide associated with that haze.
See every retained source and limitation ↓
Sequence: Virginia Beach (Jun 26) → Raleigh (Jun 26) → Richmond (Jun 26) → Durham (Jun 26)
Evidence path
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.
Source or mechanism
The catalog has a grouping hypothesis, but no retained source directly establishes the proposed cause.
Air-mass movement
NASA satellite observations show a broad haze plume over the eastern United States on June 26 and elevated carbon monoxide associated with that haze.
View transport source ↗Local response
EPA monitors recorded the event across 4 metros. The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.8 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓Event autopsy
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Wildfire smoke” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.
Durham-Chapel Hill, NC
Monitor comparison window 2003-06-23 to 2003-06-30
69% above nearby days
No adjacent-day comparison
69% higher than surrounding days
No adjacent-day comparison
5% higher than surrounding days
34% higher than surrounding days
Raleigh, NC
Monitor comparison window 2003-06-23 to 2003-06-30 · PM2.5 target: Millbrook School
80% above nearby days
85% higher than surrounding days
80% higher than surrounding days
85% higher than surrounding days
About the same as surrounding days
30% higher than surrounding days
68% higher than surrounding days
About the same as surrounding days
6% higher than surrounding days
Richmond, VA
Monitor comparison window 2003-06-23 to 2003-06-30
58% above nearby days
No adjacent-day comparison
58% higher than surrounding days
No adjacent-day comparison
About the same as surrounding days
About the same as surrounding days
About the same as surrounding days
13% higher than surrounding days
About the same as surrounding days
About the same as surrounding days
Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC
Monitor comparison window 2003-06-23 to 2003-06-30 · PM2.5 target: DEQ Tidewater Regional Office
127% above nearby days
No adjacent-day comparison
127% higher than surrounding days
No adjacent-day comparison
20% lower than surrounding days
8% higher than surrounding days
26% higher than surrounding days
47% higher than surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Air-mass reconstruction
NOAA HYSPLIT traces the air arriving at each metro backward for 72 hours. Multiple arrival times and heights show whether the broad path is stable—or sensitive to assumptions about when and where the polluted layer arrived.
Air arriving near Durham-Chapel Hill
Peak-date arrivals · 2003-06-27
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions. A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near Raleigh
Peak-date arrivals · 2003-06-27
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions. A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near Richmond
Peak-date arrivals · 2003-06-26
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions. A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News
Peak-date arrivals · 2003-06-26
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions. A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Episode peak
-- cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Views from the selected metro
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
| Metro | Peak PM2.5 | Cigarettes, whole event | Peak day | All-time standing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC | 62.1 µg/m³ | 5.0 | Jun 26, 2003 | #7 of its top days |
| Raleigh, NC | 45.3 µg/m³ | 4.0 | Jun 27, 2003 | #8 of its top days |
| Richmond, VA | 44.4 µg/m³ | 2.0 | Jun 26, 2003 | #12 of its top days |
| Durham-Chapel Hill, NC | 41.3 µg/m³ | 3.7 | Jun 27, 2003 | #7 of its top days |
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
NASA Earth Observatory
NASA satellite observations show a broad haze plume over the eastern United States on June 26 and elevated carbon monoxide associated with that haze.
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
The June 26 page confirms the plume and pollution but does not itself identify the aerosol source; the wildfire interpretation comes from NASA's qualified June 24 description of the same regional haze sequence.
NASA Earth Observatory
NASA observed thick East Coast haze on June 24 and said Canadian-fire smoke was a possibility.
Context for the event; this item does not establish the attributed cause by itself.
The image precedes the supplied event and the attribution is qualified.
Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.