← Air events

Wildfire smoke Possible

2001-06-12 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL wildfire-smoke episode

June 12, 2001

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 31.7 µg/m³ near Deltona across 1 covered metro home to 739,516 people. 1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Wildfire smoke”

Daytona airport directly observed smoke while the local NWS office documented northern-county smoke and identified ongoing or new fires as the source under investigation. The fire identity was not recovered.

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

NOAA/NWS surface observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Jun 12, 2001 hypothesis

DAYTONA BEACH RGNL surface observations reporting smoke

DAYTONA BEACH RGNL, 3 km from the PM2.5 target monitor, reported the official present-weather code FU (smoke) during 3 observed hours inside the catalog event window.

National Weather Service Melbourne via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Jun 12, 2001 hypothesis

Area Forecast Discussions: northern-county smoke and ongoing fires

NWS Melbourne had reported smoke across its northern counties and, during the event window, explicitly investigated visibility reductions from smoke and fog associated with ongoing fires or new lightning starts.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Source not directly documented

    The catalog has a grouping hypothesis, but no retained source directly establishes the proposed cause.

    Open question
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The transport path has not been reconstructed

    The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.

    Research gap
  3. 3

    Local response

    31.7 µg/m³ near Deltona

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 1.4 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Wildfire smoke” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL

Monitor comparison window 2001-06-09 to 2001-06-15 · PM2.5 target: DAYTONA BLIND SERVICES

3 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 31.7 µg/m³

93% above nearby days

PM10 60 µg/m³

94% higher than surrounding days

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 31.7 µg/m³

93% higher than surrounding days

Before8.80 µg/m³ Event31.7 µg/m³ After16.4 µg/m³
1 monitor · 24 HOUR
PM10 60 µg/m³

94% higher than surrounding days

Before22 µg/m³ Event60 µg/m³ After31 µg/m³
1 monitor · 24-HR BLK AVG
Ozone 0.022 ppm

About the same as surrounding days

Before0.020 ppm Event0.022 ppm After0.026 ppm
2 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL 31.7 µg/m³ 1.4 Jun 12, 2001 #8 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

2 retained sources

Official record

DAYTONA BEACH RGNL surface observations reporting smoke

NOAA/NWS surface observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet

DAYTONA BEACH RGNL, 3 km from the PM2.5 target monitor, reported the official present-weather code FU (smoke) during 3 observed hours inside the catalog event window.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

The surface code establishes smoke at the nearby airport; it does not identify whether the source was a wildfire, prescribed burn, agricultural fire, or another local fire.

Official record

Area Forecast Discussions: northern-county smoke and ongoing fires

National Weather Service Melbourne via Iowa Environmental Mesonet

NWS Melbourne had reported smoke across its northern counties and, during the event window, explicitly investigated visibility reductions from smoke and fog associated with ongoing fires or new lightning starts.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

The discussion treats active fires as the suspected source but does not name one or issue a definitive attribution.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.