2001-01-28 Lake fire near the Lake-Polk county line episode
January 28, 2001
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 35.4 µg/m³ near Lakeland across
1 covered metro home to 852,878 people.
1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 1.3 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 1.1 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Wildfire smoke”
An exact-date NWS Tampa Bay discussion documented dense smoke held over northeast Polk County, including a half-mile visibility observation at Winter Haven. A same-period federal incident report identifies the large Lake fire near the Lake-Polk county line and smoke threatening Interstate 4. Sarasota is outside the supported scope.
LikelyApplicable reporting or a supported inference makes this the best current causal explanation.
National Weather Service Tampa Bay via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Jan 28, 2001official
The NWS said a surface ridge was holding smoke over northeast Polk County, where Winter Haven visibility was one-half mile, and expected it to mix out only after the near-surface inversion broke.
National Interagency Coordination Center · Jan 26, 2001hypothesis
The federal incident report records the 2,100-acre Lake wildfire near the Lake-Polk county line and identifies smoke as a threat to Interstate 4 immediately before the event.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
The NWS said a surface ridge was holding smoke over northeast Polk County, where Winter Haven visibility was one-half mile, and expected it to mix out only after the near-surface inversion broke.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Wildfire smoke” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL
Monitor comparison window 2001-01-25 to 2001-01-31 · PM2.5 target: Baptist Childrens' Home
4 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse35.4 µg/m³
45% above nearby days
PM1078 µg/m³
About the same as surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.535.4 µg/m³
45% higher than surrounding days
Before13.4 µg/m³ Event35.4 µg/m³ After—
PM1078 µg/m³
About the same as surrounding days
Before103 µg/m³ Event78 µg/m³ After81 µg/m³
Sulfur dioxide7.10 ppb
About the same as surrounding days
Before11.6 ppb Event7.10 ppb After5.77 ppb
Ozone0.034 ppm
32% higher than surrounding days
Before0.016 ppm Event0.034 ppm After0.026 ppm
North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton, FL
Monitor comparison window 2001-01-25 to 2001-01-31 · PM2.5 target: G.T. BRAY PARK
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse24.8 µg/m³
68% above nearby days
Air movement5 kt median wind
3 calm hours observed
What observers saw4 mi minimum visibility
0 hours at or below 3 miles
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.524.8 µg/m³
68% higher than surrounding days
Before14.8 µg/m³ Event24.8 µg/m³ After8.80 µg/m³
PM1025 µg/m³
19% higher than surrounding days
Before28 µg/m³ Event25 µg/m³ After18 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide1.11 ppm
21% lower than surrounding days
Before1.48 ppm Event1.11 ppm After1.41 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide11.2 ppb
137% higher than surrounding days
Before9.21 ppb Event11.2 ppb After0.042 ppb
Sulfur dioxide1.67 ppb
74% higher than surrounding days
Before3.08 ppb Event1.67 ppb After0.333 ppb
Ozone0.036 ppm
13% higher than surrounding days
Before0.033 ppm Event0.036 ppm After0.030 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
SARASOTA-BRADENTON, 10.6 km from the PM2.5 target
Wind5 kt median
9 kt maximum · 3 of 24 observed hours calm
Visibility4 mi minimum
0 observed hours at or below 3 miles
Temperature58.5°F median
42°F to 71°F
Humidity75% median
100% maximum
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Air-mass reconstruction
Where the air had been
NOAA HYSPLIT traces the air arriving at each metro backward for 72 hours. Multiple
arrival times and heights show whether the broad path is stable—or sensitive to
assumptions about when and where the polluted layer arrived.
Transport context · not source attribution
Air arriving near Lakeland-Winter Haven
Peak-date arrivals · 2001-01-28
Broad historyMostly northwest of the metro
72-hour reach550–1,650 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
2 retained sources
Official record
West Central Florida Area Forecast Discussion — January 28, 2001
National Weather Service Tampa Bay via Iowa Environmental Mesonet
The NWS said a surface ridge was holding smoke over northeast Polk County, where Winter Haven visibility was one-half mile, and expected it to mix out only after the near-surface inversion broke.
What it supports
An official source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.
Limit
The discussion does not support Sarasota.
Official record
Incident Management Situation Report — January 26, 2001
National Interagency Coordination Center
The federal incident report records the 2,100-acre Lake wildfire near the Lake-Polk county line and identifies smoke as a threat to Interstate 4 immediately before the event.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The exact-date NWS discussion, rather than this incident summary, supplies the measured Lakeland-area smoke connection.
What remains uncertain
Sarasota remains unattributed because the retained evidence is specific to Polk County and the Lakeland-Winter Haven scope.
Status and provenance
LikelyApplicable reporting or a supported inference makes this the best current causal explanation.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.