1999-10-27 to 1999-10-28 Birmingham-Hoover, AL wildfire-smoke episode
October 27, 1999 to October 28, 1999
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 62.4 µg/m³ near Birmingham across
1 covered metro home to 1.2 million people.
1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 4.4 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 5.2 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Wildfire smoke”
Birmingham airport reported smoke and haze for three event-window hours. The independent FPA-FOD inventory records a substantial same-window cluster of nearby Alabama Forestry Commission wildfires, while the surface archive shows predominantly calm or light winds. Together they support wildfire smoke as a possible broad cause, but do not identify one contributing fire or quantify its PM2.5 share.
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station hypothesis
FPA-FOD retains 12 Alabama Forestry Commission wildfire records discovered within 50 miles of Birmingham during the two-day smoke event, totaling 270.7 reported acres. The largest were 90 and 80 acres about 32-33 miles east of the airport on October 27 and a 76-acre fire about 36 miles away on October 28.
NOAA/NWS surface observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Oct 28, 1999hypothesis
BIRMINGHAM MUNI, 18.2 km from the PM2.5 target monitor, reported the official present-weather code FU (smoke) during 3 observed hours inside the catalog event window.
Inference, not direct attribution
surface_smoke_plus_bounded_fire_occurrences_possible.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
surface_smoke_plus_bounded_fire_occurrences_possible.v1. This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.
Inferred
2
Air-mass movement
The transport path has not been reconstructed
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
62.4 µg/m³ near Birmingham
EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.8 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Wildfire smoke” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Birmingham-Hoover, AL
Monitor comparison window 1999-10-24 to 1999-10-31 · PM2.5 target: Wylam
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse47.8 µg/m³
39% above nearby days
PM1092 µg/m³
55% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.547.8 µg/m³
39% higher than surrounding days
Before30.6 µg/m³ Event47.8 µg/m³ After22.2 µg/m³
PM1092 µg/m³
55% higher than surrounding days
Before56 µg/m³ Event92 µg/m³ After32 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide2.32 ppm
33% higher than surrounding days
Before2 ppm Event2.32 ppm After0.804 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide25.6 ppb
40% higher than surrounding days
Before17.1 ppb Event25.6 ppb After6.21 ppb
Sulfur dioxide13.2 ppb
20% lower than surrounding days
Before18.4 ppb Event13.2 ppb After3.40 ppb
Ozone0.024 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.013 ppm Event0.024 ppm After0.028 ppm
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
NOAA/NWS surface observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet
BIRMINGHAM MUNI, 18.2 km from the PM2.5 target monitor, reported the official present-weather code FU (smoke) during 3 observed hours inside the catalog event window.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The surface code establishes smoke at the nearby airport; it does not identify whether the source was a wildfire, prescribed burn, agricultural fire, or another local fire.
Official record
FPA-FOD sixth-edition fire-occurrence records near the smoke observation
USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station
FPA-FOD retains 12 Alabama Forestry Commission wildfire records discovered within 50 miles of Birmingham during the two-day smoke event, totaling 270.7 reported acres. The largest were 90 and 80 acres about 32-33 miles east of the airport on October 27 and a 76-acre fire about 36 miles away on October 28.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
FPA-FOD is a fire-occurrence inventory, not a smoke-transport or PM2.5 source-apportionment product.
What remains uncertain
No retained plume model or source-apportionment product quantifies the contribution to the daily PM2.5 value.
The result is intentionally capped at possible because the incident inventory does not prove transport to the monitor.
Status and provenance
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.