← Air events

Temperature inversion Possible

2022-11-01 Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN temperature-inversion pollution episode

November 1, 2022

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 59.7 µg/m³ near Indianapolis across 1 covered metro home to 2.2 million people. 1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 2.1 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 4.6 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Temperature inversion”

An exact-date NWS discussion forecast a very strong near-surface inversion under clear skies and calm wind. Indiana's official monitor table and EPA observations independently show a broad Indianapolis particle episode with elevated combustion tracers. The evidence supports an inversion-driven accumulation mechanism but does not identify a dominant emitting source.

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

Indiana Department of Environmental Management hypothesis

2022 PM2.5 action-day and high-value summary

Indiana's official annual table lists elevated November 1 PM2.5 at multiple Indianapolis-area monitors, including 59.7 micrograms per cubic meter at Washington Park.

Inference, not direct attribution

documented_inversion_multimonitor_accumulation.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Temperature inversion

    NWS Indianapolis expected a very strong near-surface inversion on November 1, with clear skies and calm winds combining to strengthen the overnight inversion.

    View supporting source ↗
    Documented
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The transport path has not been reconstructed

    The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.

    Research gap
  3. 3

    Local response

    59.7 µg/m³ near Indianapolis

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.7 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Temperature inversion” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN

Monitor comparison window 2022-10-29 to 2022-11-04 · PM2.5 target: Indpls- Washington Park/ in parking lot next to police station

6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 34.7 µg/m³

83% above nearby days

Air movement 2.67 kt

14% higher than surrounding days

PM10 100 µg/m³

133% higher than surrounding days

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 34.7 µg/m³

83% higher than surrounding days

Before10.4 µg/m³ Event34.7 µg/m³ After19 µg/m³
5 monitors · 1 HOUR
PM10 100 µg/m³

133% higher than surrounding days

Before21 µg/m³ Event100 µg/m³ After44 µg/m³
1 monitor · 24-HR BLK AVG
Carbon monoxide 0.533 ppm

55% higher than surrounding days

Before0.314 ppm Event0.533 ppm After0.343 ppm
2 monitors · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 13.5 ppb

53% higher than surrounding days

Before7.29 ppb Event13.5 ppb After8.83 ppb
2 monitors · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 0.019 ppb

About the same as surrounding days

Before0.058 ppb Event0.019 ppb After-0.015 ppb
2 monitors · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.023 ppm

About the same as surrounding days

Before0.017 ppm Event0.023 ppm After0.034 ppm
10 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity 49.6 °F

About the same as surrounding days

Pressure 993 Millibars

About the same as surrounding days

Temperature 58.4 °F

About the same as surrounding days

Wind 2.67 kt

14% higher than surrounding days

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Views from the selected metro

Camera views near

Browse the camera map →

Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN 59.7 µg/m³ 2.7 Nov 1, 2022 #10 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

3 retained sources

Official record

Area Forecast Discussion: very strong near-surface inversion over Indianapolis

National Weather Service Indianapolis via Iowa Environmental Mesonet

NWS Indianapolis expected a very strong near-surface inversion on November 1, with clear skies and calm winds combining to strengthen the overnight inversion.

What it supports

A retained source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.

Limit

The forecast discussion identifies the trapping mechanism but not the particles' emitting sources.

Official record

2022 PM2.5 action-day and high-value summary

Indiana Department of Environmental Management

Indiana's official annual table lists elevated November 1 PM2.5 at multiple Indianapolis-area monitors, including 59.7 micrograms per cubic meter at Washington Park.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

The table confirms the date and monitored values but does not assign an emissions source.

Official record

Indianapolis multi-monitor pollution fingerprint, November 1, 2022

U.S. EPA AirData

EPA observations show elevated PM2.5 across five hourly-series monitors and six daily-series monitors, accompanied by higher PM10, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen dioxide than the preceding comparison window.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

The multi-monitor fingerprint confirms accumulation but cannot apportion PM2.5 among local or transported sources; pollutants need not have been measured at the same site.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.