2014-02-13 Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN temperature-inversion pollution episode
February 13, 2014
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 51.6 µg/m³ near Indianapolis across
1 covered metro home to 2.2 million people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 1.7 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 3.8 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Temperature inversion”
Indianapolis's seven-monitor daily PM2.5 value rose with PM10, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and carbon monoxide. Exact-date NWS discussions reported morning haze and low-level moisture becoming trapped beneath a strong inversion. Together they support inversion trapping at possible confidence without identifying one emitting source.
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
EPA records show a median daily PM2.5 value of 41.3 micrograms per cubic meter across 7 monitors during the event, compared with 23.4 before and 26.15 after. Same-window context included PM10 Total 0-10um STP 49 Micrograms/cubic meter (25 C), Carbon monoxide 0.5708 Parts per million, Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) 37.7 Parts per billion, Sulfur dioxide 9.7792 Parts per billion, Ozone 0.0281 Parts per million.
National Weather Service via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Feb 13, 2014hypothesis
NWS Indianapolis reported brief morning haze or fog and forecast low-level moisture becoming trapped beneath a strong inversion later in the event day.
Inference, not direct attribution
Documented inversion overlap: The event overlaps a documented inversion period, but the retained material does not directly attribute the measured PM2.5 episode.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
Documented inversion overlap. The event overlaps a documented inversion period, but the retained material does not directly attribute the measured PM2.5 episode.
Inferred
2
Air-mass movement
The transport path has not been reconstructed
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
51.6 µg/m³ near Indianapolis
EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.3 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Temperature inversion” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN
Monitor comparison window 2014-02-10 to 2014-02-16 · PM2.5 target: Anderson- Eastside Elem. School
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse41.3 µg/m³
58% above nearby days
Air movement10 kt median wind
3 calm hours observed
What observers saw4 mi minimum visibility
Haze reported during 2 hours
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.541.3 µg/m³
58% higher than surrounding days
Before23.4 µg/m³ Event41.3 µg/m³ After26.1 µg/m³
PM1049 µg/m³
69% higher than surrounding days
Before31 µg/m³ Event49 µg/m³ After28 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.571 ppm
25% higher than surrounding days
Before0.467 ppm Event0.571 ppm After0.435 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide37.7 ppb
77% higher than surrounding days
Before25.1 ppb Event37.7 ppb After17.4 ppb
Sulfur dioxide9.78 ppb
109% higher than surrounding days
Before2.31 ppb Event9.78 ppb After4.68 ppb
Ozone0.028 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.025 ppm Event0.028 ppm After0.031 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
ANDERSON MUNICIP, 3.8 km from the PM2.5 target
Wind10 kt median
10 kt maximum · 3 of 8 observed hours calm
Visibility4 mi minimum
0 observed hours at or below 3 miles
Temperature28.4°F median
6.8°F to 32°F
Humidity41% median
78% maximum
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
3 retained sources
Official record
Area Forecast Discussion: haze and moisture trapped beneath a strong inversion
National Weather Service via Iowa Environmental Mesonet
NWS Indianapolis reported brief morning haze or fog and forecast low-level moisture becoming trapped beneath a strong inversion later in the event day.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The inversion discussion was written partly in the context of moisture and freezing drizzle and does not apportion the measured particle mass.
EPA records show a median daily PM2.5 value of 41.3 micrograms per cubic meter across 7 monitors during the event, compared with 23.4 before and 26.15 after. Same-window context included PM10 Total 0-10um STP 49 Micrograms/cubic meter (25 C), Carbon monoxide 0.5708 Parts per million, Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) 37.7 Parts per billion, Sulfur dioxide 9.7792 Parts per billion, Ozone 0.0281 Parts per million.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The measured fingerprint establishes the episode and co-pollutant pattern but cannot uniquely apportion its sources.
U.S. EPA EQUATES CMAQ via Remote Sensing Information Gateway
EPA's retrospective 12-kilometer model reproduced an event-centered fine-mass increase of 1.6952 times adjacent modeled days. The modeled mixture was 33.8% organic matter, 48.5% secondary ions, 4.6% soil, and 6.8% elemental carbon.
What it supports
Context for the event; this item does not establish the attributed cause by itself.
Limit
EQUATES is a retrospective chemical-transport model, not a monitor observation or source-apportionment determination; it is retained as compatible composition context only.
What remains uncertain
EQUATES is a retrospective chemical-transport model, not a monitor observation or source-apportionment determination; it is retained as compatible composition context only.
The classification identifies a broad occurrence or atmospheric mechanism, not a complete source-sector allocation of the daily PM2.5 mass.
The inversion discussion was written partly in the context of moisture and freezing drizzle and does not apportion the measured particle mass.
The measured fingerprint establishes the episode and co-pollutant pattern but cannot uniquely apportion its sources.
Status and provenance
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.