Daily PM2.5 peaked at 55.6 µg/m³ near Portland across
1 covered metro home to 2.5 million people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 2.2 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 5.7 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Temperature inversion”
The same-day NWS Portland discussion directly connects a strong inversion and lack of low-level mixing with unhealthy particulate buildup in Clark County and the Greater Vancouver area. This supports an accumulation mechanism for the Portland-Vancouver metro, not a unique emissions source.
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
National Weather Service Portland via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Nov 25, 2013corroborates
NWS Portland reported that a strong inversion and shelter from mixing winds had allowed unhealthy particulate levels to build in Clark County, and issued an air-stagnation advisory for the Greater Vancouver area.
Inference, not direct attribution
Documented inversion overlap: The event overlaps a documented inversion period, but the retained material does not directly attribute the measured PM2.5 episode.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
NWS Portland reported that a strong inversion and shelter from mixing winds had allowed unhealthy particulate levels to build in Clark County, and issued an air-stagnation advisory for the Greater Vancouver area.
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
55.6 µg/m³ near Portland
EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.5 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Temperature inversion” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA
Monitor comparison window 2013-11-22 to 2013-11-28 · PM2.5 target: Vancouver-NE Vancouver Plaza Dr
5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse55.6 µg/m³
7% above nearby days
Air movement1.94 kt
About the same as surrounding days
Carbon monoxide0.465 ppm
66% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.555.6 µg/m³
7% higher than surrounding days
Before35 µg/m³ Event55.6 µg/m³ After61.2 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.465 ppm
66% higher than surrounding days
Before0.213 ppm Event0.465 ppm After0.320 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide14.4 ppb
38% higher than surrounding days
Before10 ppb Event14.4 ppb After10.6 ppb
Sulfur dioxide2.35 ppb
33% higher than surrounding days
Before1.59 ppb Event2.35 ppb After1.77 ppb
Ozone0.017 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.026 ppm Event0.017 ppm After0.017 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity56 %
5% higher than surrounding days
Pressure1017 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature40.3 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Wind1.94 kt
About the same as surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
1 retained source
Official record
Area Forecast Discussion: inversion effects on Portland-Vancouver air quality
National Weather Service Portland via Iowa Environmental Mesonet
NWS Portland reported that a strong inversion and shelter from mixing winds had allowed unhealthy particulate levels to build in Clark County, and issued an air-stagnation advisory for the Greater Vancouver area.
What it supports
A retained source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.
Limit
The discussion identifies the trapping mechanism but not the contributing emissions mixture.
What remains uncertain
The estimate is mechanism-level and capped at possible; it does not name a source occurrence.
Status and provenance
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.