← Air events

Temperature inversion Possible

2003-03-16 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI temperature-inversion pollution episode

March 16, 2003

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 59.5 µg/m³ near Detroit across 1 covered metro home to 4.4 million people.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 2.2 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 9.5 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Temperature inversion”

The NWS discussion immediately preceding March 16 said low-level moisture was trapped beneath a strong inversion and expected limited mixing to persist. The retained scope and limitations support possible confidence for this local episode.

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Temperature inversion

    The NWS discussion immediately preceding March 16 said low-level moisture was trapped beneath a strong inversion and expected limited mixing to persist.

    View supporting source ↗
    Documented
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The transport path has not been reconstructed

    The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.

    Research gap
  3. 3

    Local response

    59.5 µg/m³ near Detroit

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.7 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Temperature inversion” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI

Monitor comparison window 2003-03-13 to 2003-03-19 · PM2.5 target: Port Huron

5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 50.6 µg/m³

12% above nearby days

Air movement 2.53 kt

34% lower than surrounding days

PM10 47 µg/m³

7% higher than surrounding days

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 50.6 µg/m³

12% higher than surrounding days

Before23.4 µg/m³ Event50.6 µg/m³ After48.4 µg/m³
10 monitors · 24 HOUR
PM10 47 µg/m³

7% higher than surrounding days

Before44 µg/m³ Event47 µg/m³ After42 µg/m³
1 monitor · 24-HR BLK AVG
Carbon monoxide 0.819 ppm

69% higher than surrounding days

Before0.485 ppm Event0.819 ppm After0.310 ppm
5 monitors · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 43 ppb

22% higher than surrounding days

Before35.3 ppb Event43 ppb After20.9 ppb
2 monitors · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 15.3 ppb

63% higher than surrounding days

Before14.9 ppb Event15.3 ppb After4.61 ppb
4 monitors · 1 HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity 72.3 %

About the same as surrounding days

Pressure 989 Millibars

About the same as surrounding days

Temperature 47.7 °F

14% higher than surrounding days

Wind 2.53 kt

34% lower than surrounding days

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Views from the selected metro

Camera views near

Browse the camera map →

Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI 59.5 µg/m³ 2.7 Mar 16, 2003 #17 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

1 retained source

Official record

Area Forecast Discussion: moisture trapped under a strong inversion

National Weather Service Detroit/Pontiac via Iowa Environmental Mesonet

The NWS discussion immediately preceding March 16 said low-level moisture was trapped beneath a strong inversion and expected limited mixing to persist.

What it supports

A retained source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.

Limit

The discussion establishes the accumulation mechanism but does not identify the trapped particle sources.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.