← Air events

Temperature inversion Possible

2002-07-08 to 2002-07-09 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX temperature-inversion pollution episode

July 8, 2002 to July 9, 2002

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 43 µg/m³ near Dallas across 1 covered metro home to 8.3 million people.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 2.7 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 23 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Temperature inversion”

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX's 12-monitor PM2.5 value was 2.277 times the adjacent-window comparison. Surface observations recorded wind at or below three knots during 54% of event-day hours, and a nearby event-date radiosonde measured a surface-based inversion of 3.2 degrees Celsius through 141 meters above ground. Together, these observations support temperature-inversion accumulation as a possible mechanism. They do not identify the trapped particle sources.

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

NOAA/NWS radiosonde observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Jul 8, 2002 hypothesis

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX event-date upper-air inversion, 2002-07-08

Fort Worth Area -- KFWH KFWD's 12 UTC radiosonde profile measured temperature rising 3.2 degrees Celsius from 196 to 337 meters, a 141-meter surface-based inversion. The NOAA/IGRA station is 41.0 kilometers from the PM2.5 target monitor.

Inference, not direct attribution

exact_radiosonde_inversion_plus_multimonitor_accumulation_possible.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Pattern-based explanation

    exact_radiosonde_inversion_plus_multimonitor_accumulation_possible.v1. This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.

    Inferred
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The transport path has not been reconstructed

    The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.

    Research gap
  3. 3

    Local response

    43 µg/m³ near Dallas

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.0 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Temperature inversion” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX

Monitor comparison window 2002-07-05 to 2002-07-12 · PM2.5 target: Dallas Hinton

5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 38.1 µg/m³

82% above nearby days

Air movement 3 kt median wind

19 calm hours observed

What observers saw 4 mi minimum visibility

Haze reported during 5 hours

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 38.1 µg/m³

82% higher than surrounding days

Before21.9 µg/m³ Event38.1 µg/m³ After11.6 µg/m³
12 monitors · 24 HOUR
Carbon monoxide 0.512 ppm

19% higher than surrounding days

Before0.475 ppm Event0.512 ppm After0.329 ppm
3 monitors · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 15.1 ppb

48% higher than surrounding days

Before9.05 ppb Event15.1 ppb After8.67 ppb
9 monitors · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 0.427 ppb

188% higher than surrounding days

Before0.109 ppb Event0.427 ppb After0.065 ppb
4 monitors · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.054 ppm

26% higher than surrounding days

Before0.035 ppm Event0.054 ppm After0.042 ppm
18 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

DALLAS/LOVE FIELD, 3.1 km from the PM2.5 target
Wind 3 kt median

10 kt maximum · 19 of 48 observed hours calm

Visibility 4 mi minimum

0 observed hours at or below 3 miles

Temperature 87.5°F median

76°F to 96°F

Humidity 63% median

88% maximum

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Views from the selected metro

Camera views near

Browse the camera map →

Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 43 µg/m³ 3.7 Jul 8, 2002 #16 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

4 retained sources

Official record

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX surface conditions, 2002-07-08 to 2002-07-09

National Weather Service surface observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet

DALLAS/LOVE FIELD recorded calm conditions during 40% of event hours and wind at or below three knots during 54%. Observations included 5 haze hours, 1 mist hours, minimum visibility 4 miles.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

A single surface station documents weak ventilation and obscuration but not the full vertical profile or particle source mix.

Official record

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX event-date upper-air inversion, 2002-07-08

NOAA/NWS radiosonde observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet

Fort Worth Area -- KFWH KFWD's 12 UTC radiosonde profile measured temperature rising 3.2 degrees Celsius from 196 to 337 meters, a 141-meter surface-based inversion. The NOAA/IGRA station is 41.0 kilometers from the PM2.5 target monitor.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

The radiosonde station is 41.0 kilometers from the PM2.5 target monitor and may not represent every part of the metro airshed.

Official record

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX joint pollution fingerprint, 2002-07-08 to 2002-07-09

U.S. EPA AirData

EPA records show median daily PM2.5 of 38.075 micrograms per cubic meter across 12 monitors, 2.277 times the adjacent-window level. Co-pollutants at least 10% above the adjacent-window comparison were carbon monoxide (1.275x), nitrogen dioxide (1.708x), sulfur dioxide (4.912x).

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

The broad multi-pollutant response does not apportion traffic, heating, industry, wood combustion, or secondary aerosol.

News report

Don't Breathe The Yellow Air

KERA News

A contemporaneous KERA commentary described North Texas air during the prior week as unusually yellow and thick, with haze, ozone, dust, particulates, and four level-red alerts already recorded that season.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

The commentary describes the prior week rather than naming July 8-9, and its wildfire comparison is figurative rather than evidence of smoke.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.