2001-12-27 to 2001-12-31 Ogden-Clearfield, UT, Provo-Orem, UT, and 1 other metros temperature-inversion pollution episode
December 27, 2001 to December 31, 2001
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 83 µg/m³ near Provo across
3 covered metros home to 2.7 million people.
3 metros placed a top-ten day in their record.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 9.1 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 25 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Temperature inversion”
Manual research connected 2 source events to one temperature-inversion pollution episode using the deterministic grouping rule.
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
National Weather Service via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Dec 29, 2001hypothesis
On the final day of the Wasatch Front event, the NWS discussion said temperature inversions would continue in the northern valleys and described pollution or haze trapped in populated valleys.
National Weather Service Salt Lake City via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Dec 29, 2001hypothesis
The NWS Salt Lake City discussion said temperature inversions would continue in northern Utah valleys as a weak system crossed the area immediately before the December 30-31 episode.
National Weather Service Salt Lake City via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Dec 31, 2001hypothesis
On December 31, the NWS said the disturbance crossing Utah would not be strong enough to break the inversion over most valleys, directly overlapping the final event day.
Inference, not direct attribution
Documented inversion overlap: The event overlaps a documented inversion period, but the retained material does not directly attribute the measured PM2.5 episode.
: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.
Sequence: Provo (Dec 27) → Salt Lake City (Dec 27) → Ogden (Dec 27)
Evidence path
From source to city
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
Documented inversion overlap. The event overlaps a documented inversion period, but the retained material does not directly attribute the measured PM2.5 episode.
Inferred
2
Air-mass movement
The transport path has not been reconstructed
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
83 µg/m³ near Provo
EPA monitors recorded the event across 3 metros.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 3.8 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Temperature inversion” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Ogden-Clearfield, UT
Monitor comparison window 2001-12-27 to 2002-01-03 · PM2.5 target: Ogden
5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse65.7 µg/m³
30% above nearby days
PM1080 µg/m³
About the same as surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.565.7 µg/m³
30% higher than surrounding days
Before50.7 µg/m³ Event65.7 µg/m³ After19.8 µg/m³
PM1080 µg/m³
About the same as surrounding days
Before81 µg/m³ Event80 µg/m³ After42 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide1.16 ppm
15% lower than surrounding days
Before1.36 ppm Event1.16 ppm After1.36 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide49.8 ppb
About the same as surrounding days
Before57.3 ppb Event49.8 ppb After46.1 ppb
Sulfur dioxide3.14 ppb
24% lower than surrounding days
Before5.38 ppb Event3.14 ppb After3.46 ppb
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Temperature28 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Provo-Orem, UT
Monitor comparison window 2001-12-27 to 2002-01-03 · PM2.5 target: North Provo
4 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse60.5 µg/m³
17% above nearby days
PM1078.3 µg/m³
10% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.560.5 µg/m³
17% higher than surrounding days
Before70.3 µg/m³ Event60.5 µg/m³ After23.8 µg/m³
PM1078.3 µg/m³
10% higher than surrounding days
Before101 µg/m³ Event78.3 µg/m³ After45 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide1.28 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before1.33 ppm Event1.28 ppm After1.33 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide48.8 ppb
10% higher than surrounding days
Before44.8 ppb Event48.8 ppb After43.4 ppb
Salt Lake City, UT
Monitor comparison window 2001-12-27 to 2002-01-03 · PM2.5 target: Hawthorne
5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse68 µg/m³
6% above nearby days
PM1070 µg/m³
6% lower than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.568 µg/m³
6% higher than surrounding days
Before76.8 µg/m³ Event68 µg/m³ After36 µg/m³
PM1070 µg/m³
6% lower than surrounding days
Before97 µg/m³ Event70 µg/m³ After61 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide1.34 ppm
21% lower than surrounding days
Before1.73 ppm Event1.34 ppm After1.70 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide48.4 ppb
About the same as surrounding days
Before61.9 ppb Event48.4 ppb After45 ppb
Sulfur dioxide1.97 ppb
13% lower than surrounding days
Before2.69 ppb Event1.97 ppb After2.09 ppb
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity97.7 %
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature29.4 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
3 retained sources
Official record
Utah Area Forecast Discussion — December 31, 2001
National Weather Service Salt Lake City via Iowa Environmental Mesonet
On December 31, the NWS said the disturbance crossing Utah would not be strong enough to break the inversion over most valleys, directly overlapping the final event day.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
This is meteorological evidence for an accumulation mechanism, not a source-specific PM2.5 attribution.
Official record
NWS Salt Lake City Area Forecast Discussion — December 29, 2001
National Weather Service via Iowa Environmental Mesonet
On the final day of the Wasatch Front event, the NWS discussion said temperature inversions would continue in the northern valleys and described pollution or haze trapped in populated valleys.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The forecast discussion documents the accumulation meteorology, not the emitting sources or chemical composition.
Official record
Utah Area Forecast Discussion — December 29, 2001
National Weather Service Salt Lake City via Iowa Environmental Mesonet
The NWS Salt Lake City discussion said temperature inversions would continue in northern Utah valleys as a weak system crossed the area immediately before the December 30-31 episode.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
This is meteorological evidence for an accumulation mechanism, not a source-specific PM2.5 attribution.
What remains uncertain
The NWS discussions establish a persistent inversion but do not identify which primary or secondary particle sources dominated the measured PM2.5.
The archived discussion supports a possible mechanism classification, not a named causal episode.
The forecast discussion documents the accumulation meteorology, not the emitting sources or chemical composition.
Status and provenance
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.