2001-01-06 Provo-Orem, UT temperature-inversion pollution episode
January 6, 2001
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 74 µg/m³ near Provo across
1 covered metro home to 760,531 people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 3.0 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 2.3 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Temperature inversion”
NWS Salt Lake City documented stagnant conditions in northern Utah valleys and existing valley inversions on the exact event date, with insufficient mixing expected to clear them. This supports inversion trapping as the episode mechanism but does not identify the contributing particle sources.
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
National Weather Service Salt Lake City via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Jan 6, 2001hypothesis
NWS Salt Lake City reported another several days of stagnant northern-Utah valley conditions, explicitly described valley inversions, and said the weak disturbance was unlikely to provide enough mixing to clear them.
Inference, not direct attribution
Documented inversion overlap: The event overlaps a documented inversion period, but the retained material does not directly attribute the measured PM2.5 episode.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
Documented inversion overlap. The event overlaps a documented inversion period, but the retained material does not directly attribute the measured PM2.5 episode.
Inferred
2
Air-mass movement
The transport path has not been reconstructed
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
74 µg/m³ near Provo
EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 3.4 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Temperature inversion” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Provo-Orem, UT
Monitor comparison window 2001-01-03 to 2001-01-09 · PM2.5 target: Lindon
4 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse74 µg/m³
50% above nearby days
PM10100 µg/m³
15% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.574 µg/m³
50% higher than surrounding days
Before54.4 µg/m³ Event74 µg/m³ After44.5 µg/m³
PM10100 µg/m³
15% higher than surrounding days
Before87 µg/m³ Event100 µg/m³ After72 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide2.15 ppm
6% higher than surrounding days
Before1.85 ppm Event2.15 ppm After2.12 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide60.5 ppb
24% higher than surrounding days
Before41.1 ppb Event60.5 ppb After50.5 ppb
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
1 retained source
Official record
Utah Area Forecast Discussion: stagnant valley inversions
National Weather Service Salt Lake City via Iowa Environmental Mesonet
NWS Salt Lake City reported another several days of stagnant northern-Utah valley conditions, explicitly described valley inversions, and said the weak disturbance was unlikely to provide enough mixing to clear them.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The discussion is regional to northern Utah valleys and does not name the Provo PM2.5 monitor.
What remains uncertain
The mechanism estimate is capped at possible because the archive does not directly discuss the event's PM2.5 measurement.
Status and provenance
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.