2000-02-08 to 2000-02-09 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN temperature-inversion pollution episode
February 8, 2000 to February 9, 2000
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 49.7 µg/m³ near Cincinnati across
1 covered metro home to 2.3 million people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 3.3 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 7.7 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Temperature inversion”
Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN's 8-monitor PM2.5 value was 1.455 times the adjacent-window comparison. Surface observations recorded wind at or below three knots during 67% of event-day hours, and a nearby event-date radiosonde measured a surface-based inversion of 3.9 degrees Celsius through 495 meters above ground. Together, these observations support temperature-inversion accumulation as a possible mechanism. They do not identify the trapped particle sources.
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
National Weather Service surface observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Feb 8, 2000hypothesis
CINCINNAT/LUNKEN recorded calm conditions during 54% of event hours and wind at or below three knots during 67%. Observations included 1 haze hours, 21 mist hours, minimum visibility 2 miles.
EPA records show median daily PM2.5 of 37.675 micrograms per cubic meter across 8 monitors, 1.455 times the adjacent-window level. Co-pollutants at least 10% above the adjacent-window comparison were pm10 (1.238x), carbon monoxide (1.887x), nitrogen dioxide (1.606x), sulfur dioxide (1.4x).
NOAA/NWS radiosonde observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Feb 9, 2000hypothesis
Cncnati-Daytn OH/US's 12 UTC radiosonde profile measured temperature rising 3.9 degrees Celsius from 317 to 812 meters, a 495-meter surface-based inversion. The NOAA/IGRA station is 61.9 kilometers from the PM2.5 target monitor.
Inference, not direct attribution
exact_radiosonde_inversion_plus_multimonitor_accumulation_possible.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
exact_radiosonde_inversion_plus_multimonitor_accumulation_possible.v1. This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.
Inferred
2
Air-mass movement
The transport path has not been reconstructed
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
49.7 µg/m³ near Cincinnati
EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.3 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Temperature inversion” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN
Monitor comparison window 2000-02-05 to 2000-02-12 · PM2.5 target: Carthage
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse37.7 µg/m³
21% above nearby days
Air movement0 kt median wind
26 calm hours observed
What observers saw2 mi minimum visibility
Haze reported during 1 hour
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.537.7 µg/m³
21% higher than surrounding days
Before21.5 µg/m³ Event37.7 µg/m³ After30.3 µg/m³
PM1031.3 µg/m³
24% higher than surrounding days
Before24.5 µg/m³ Event31.3 µg/m³ After26 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide1.01 ppm
72% higher than surrounding days
Before0.529 ppm Event1.01 ppm After0.537 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide31.3 ppb
32% higher than surrounding days
Before20.9 ppb Event31.3 ppb After18.1 ppb
Sulfur dioxide11.5 ppb
41% higher than surrounding days
Before10.5 ppb Event11.5 ppb After5.90 ppb
Ozone0.019 ppm
17% lower than surrounding days
Before0.027 ppm Event0.019 ppm After0.022 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
CINCINNAT/LUNKEN, 11.4 km from the PM2.5 target
Wind0 kt median
13 kt maximum · 26 of 48 observed hours calm
Visibility2 mi minimum
9 observed hours at or below 3 miles
Temperature32.5°F median
21°F to 59°F
Humidity82% median
96% maximum
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
NOAA/NWS radiosonde observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet
Cncnati-Daytn OH/US's 12 UTC radiosonde profile measured temperature rising 3.9 degrees Celsius from 317 to 812 meters, a 495-meter surface-based inversion. The NOAA/IGRA station is 61.9 kilometers from the PM2.5 target monitor.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The radiosonde station is 61.9 kilometers from the PM2.5 target monitor and may not represent every part of the metro airshed.
Official record
Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN surface conditions, 2000-02-08 to 2000-02-09
National Weather Service surface observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet
CINCINNAT/LUNKEN recorded calm conditions during 54% of event hours and wind at or below three knots during 67%. Observations included 1 haze hours, 21 mist hours, minimum visibility 2 miles.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
A single surface station documents ventilation and obscuration but not the full vertical profile or particle source mix.
Official record
Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN joint pollution fingerprint, 2000-02-08 to 2000-02-09
U.S. EPA AirData
EPA records show median daily PM2.5 of 37.675 micrograms per cubic meter across 8 monitors, 1.455 times the adjacent-window level. Co-pollutants at least 10% above the adjacent-window comparison were pm10 (1.238x), carbon monoxide (1.887x), nitrogen dioxide (1.606x), sulfur dioxide (1.4x).
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The pollution fingerprint does not uniquely apportion traffic, heating, industry, wood combustion, or secondary aerosol.
What remains uncertain
Confidence is capped at possible because exact-event source apportionment was not recovered.
The classification identifies an atmospheric retention mechanism, not a unique emissions source.
The pollution fingerprint does not uniquely apportion traffic, heating, industry, wood combustion, or secondary aerosol.
The same pattern also occurred in benchmark temperature-inversion and regional-secondary-PM episodes.
The strict joint-fingerprint rule achieved 22.2% precision for stagnant mixed pollution on the 56-case labeled benchmark.
Status and provenance
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.