1999-10-16 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR temperature-inversion pollution episode
October 16, 1999
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 38.6 µg/m³ near Little Rock across
1 covered metro home to 769,258 people.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Temperature inversion”
Three Little Rock-area regulatory monitors recorded PM2.5 at 2.016 times the adjacent-window comparison. Surface observations recorded wind at or below three knots during 54% of event-day hours and haze during 18 hours. A nearby event-date radiosonde measured a surface-based inversion of 4.1 degrees Celsius through 264 meters above ground. Together, these observations support temperature-inversion accumulation as a possible mechanism, without identifying the trapped particle sources.
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
NOAA/NWS radiosonde observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Oct 16, 1999hypothesis
North Little Roc AR/US's 12 UTC radiosonde profile measured temperature rising 4.1 degrees Celsius through 264 meters above ground, a 264-meter surface-based inversion. The NOAA/IGRA station is 9.0 kilometers from the PM2.5 target monitor.
National Weather Service surface observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Oct 16, 1999hypothesis
Little Rock airport observations report haze during 18 of 24 event-day hours. Winds were calm during 12 hours and at or below three knots during 13 hours; visibility fell to 2.5 miles.
EPA records show median daily PM2.5 of 38.6 micrograms per cubic meter across 3 Little Rock-area monitors, 2.016 times the adjacent-window level. Carbon monoxide was 1.293, nitrogen dioxide 2.021, and sulfur dioxide 1.3 times their adjacent-window comparisons.
Inference, not direct attribution
exact_radiosonde_inversion_plus_multimonitor_accumulation_possible.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
exact_radiosonde_inversion_plus_multimonitor_accumulation_possible.v1. This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.
Inferred
2
Air-mass movement
The transport path has not been reconstructed
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
38.6 µg/m³ near Little Rock
EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 1.8 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Temperature inversion” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR
Monitor comparison window 1999-10-13 to 1999-10-19 · PM2.5 target: PARR
5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse38.6 µg/m³
144% above nearby days
Air movement1.5 kt median wind
12 calm hours observed
What observers saw2.5 mi minimum visibility
Haze reported during 18 hours
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.538.6 µg/m³
144% higher than surrounding days
Before27 µg/m³ Event38.6 µg/m³ After11.3 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide1.63 ppm
26% higher than surrounding days
Before1.43 ppm Event1.63 ppm After1.09 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide20.6 ppb
66% higher than surrounding days
Before12.4 ppb Event20.6 ppb After7.98 ppb
Sulfur dioxide3.17 ppb
23% higher than surrounding days
Before2.57 ppb Event3.17 ppb After2.30 ppb
Ozone0.031 ppm
50% higher than surrounding days
Before0.029 ppm Event0.031 ppm After0.014 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
LITTLE ROCK/ADAMS, 5.3 km from the PM2.5 target
Wind1.5 kt median
14 kt maximum · 12 of 24 observed hours calm
Visibility2.5 mi minimum
2 observed hours at or below 3 miles
Temperature68°F median
61°F to 85°F
Humidity81% median
97% maximum
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
3 retained sources
Official record
Little Rock event-date upper-air inversion, October 16, 1999
NOAA/NWS radiosonde observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet
North Little Roc AR/US's 12 UTC radiosonde profile measured temperature rising 4.1 degrees Celsius through 264 meters above ground, a 264-meter surface-based inversion. The NOAA/IGRA station is 9.0 kilometers from the PM2.5 target monitor.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The radiosonde station is 9.0 kilometers from the PM2.5 target monitor and may not represent every part of the metro airshed.
Official record
Little Rock airport surface conditions, October 16, 1999
National Weather Service surface observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet
Little Rock airport observations report haze during 18 of 24 event-day hours. Winds were calm during 12 hours and at or below three knots during 13 hours; visibility fell to 2.5 miles.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
One airport station cannot determine the vertical mixing depth or apportion the observed particles by source.
Official record
Little Rock joint pollution fingerprint, October 16, 1999
U.S. EPA AirData
EPA records show median daily PM2.5 of 38.6 micrograms per cubic meter across 3 Little Rock-area monitors, 2.016 times the adjacent-window level. Carbon monoxide was 1.293, nitrogen dioxide 2.021, and sulfur dioxide 1.3 times their adjacent-window comparisons.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The co-pollutant pattern supports mixed combustion and precursor accumulation but does not assign source-sector shares.
What remains uncertain
Confidence is capped at possible because exact-event source apportionment was not recovered.
The classification identifies an atmospheric retention mechanism, not a unique emissions source.
Status and provenance
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.