2020-11-07 Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN stagnant mixed-pollution episode
November 7, 2020
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 52.8 µg/m³ near Indianapolis across
1 covered metro home to 2.2 million people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 1.8 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 3.9 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Stagnant pollution mixture”
Exact-date NWS discussions document strong ridging, surface high pressure, deep subsidence, clear skies, and calm-to-light wind. Indiana and EPA observations independently show a metro-wide particle episode with elevated combustion tracers. The evidence supports accumulation of an unidentified anthropogenic mixture rather than a named exceptional source.
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
National Weather Service Indianapolis via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Nov 7, 2020corroborates
NWS Indianapolis documented strong ridging aloft and high pressure at the surface, with calm to six-knot overnight winds followed by light flow during the event day.
EPA observations show elevated PM2.5 across five monitoring series, with higher PM10, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen dioxide than the following comparison window and lower event-window wind than the preceding period.
Indiana Department of Environmental Management hypothesis
Indiana's official annual table lists elevated November 7 PM2.5 across Indianapolis-area monitors, including 52.8 micrograms per cubic meter at West 18th Street and 36.4 at I-70.
Inference, not direct attribution
documented_ridge_weak_flow_multimonitor_accumulation.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
NWS Indianapolis documented strong ridging aloft and high pressure at the surface, with calm to six-knot overnight winds followed by light flow during the event day.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Stagnant pollution mixture” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN
Monitor comparison window 2020-11-04 to 2020-11-10 · PM2.5 target: Indpls- W. 18th St./ Ernie Pyle School 90
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse30.6 µg/m³
109% above nearby days
Air movement2.16 kt
20% lower than surrounding days
PM1049 µg/m³
69% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.530.6 µg/m³
109% higher than surrounding days
Before14.7 µg/m³ Event30.6 µg/m³ After10.9 µg/m³
PM1049 µg/m³
69% higher than surrounding days
Before39 µg/m³ Event49 µg/m³ After26 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.718 ppm
60% higher than surrounding days
Before0.450 ppm Event0.718 ppm After0.404 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide19.9 ppb
82% higher than surrounding days
Before15 ppb Event19.9 ppb After9.98 ppb
Sulfur dioxide0.626 ppb
10% lower than surrounding days
Before0.879 ppb Event0.626 ppb After0.410 ppb
Ozone0.025 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.024 ppm Event0.025 ppm After0.024 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity43.6 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Pressure996 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature58.9 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Wind2.16 kt
20% lower than surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Air-mass reconstruction
Where the air had been
NOAA HYSPLIT traces the air arriving at each metro backward for 72 hours. Multiple
arrival times and heights show whether the broad path is stable—or sensitive to
assumptions about when and where the polluted layer arrived.
Transport context · not source attribution
Air arriving near Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson
Peak-date arrivals · 2020-11-07
Broad historyMostly south of the metro
72-hour reach650–1,200 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
3 retained sources
Official record
Area Forecast Discussion: strong ridge, surface high pressure, and light flow
National Weather Service Indianapolis via Iowa Environmental Mesonet
NWS Indianapolis documented strong ridging aloft and high pressure at the surface, with calm to six-knot overnight winds followed by light flow during the event day.
What it supports
A retained source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.
Limit
The discussion documents poor-dispersion ingredients but does not identify a dominant source or explicitly attribute the PM2.5 measurement.
Official record
Indianapolis multi-monitor pollution fingerprint, November 7, 2020
U.S. EPA AirData
EPA observations show elevated PM2.5 across five monitoring series, with higher PM10, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen dioxide than the following comparison window and lower event-window wind than the preceding period.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The fingerprint supports broad accumulation but cannot distinguish local emissions, regional secondary aerosol, smoke, or another mixture.
Official record
2020 PM2.5 action-day and high-value summary
Indiana Department of Environmental Management
Indiana's official annual table lists elevated November 7 PM2.5 across Indianapolis-area monitors, including 52.8 micrograms per cubic meter at West 18th Street and 36.4 at I-70.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The table confirms a broad exact-date episode but does not assign a cause.
What remains uncertain
The discussion documents poor-dispersion ingredients but does not identify a dominant source or explicitly attribute the PM2.5 measurement.
The fingerprint supports broad accumulation but cannot distinguish local emissions, regional secondary aerosol, smoke, or another mixture.
The table confirms a broad exact-date episode but does not assign a cause.
Status and provenance
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.