← Air events

Stagnant pollution mixture Possible

2007-08-02 to 2007-08-03 Tulsa, OK stagnant mixed-pollution episode

August 2, 2007 to August 3, 2007

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 38.5 µg/m³ near Tulsa across 1 covered metro home to 1.1 million people.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 2.5 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 2.7 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Stagnant pollution mixture”

Tulsa's two-day PM2.5 episode occurred while exact-window NWS discussions described a largely stagnant local pattern, building upper-level high pressure, and haze that persisted for several days before stronger flow dispersed it. This supports broad stagnant mixed-pollution accumulation at possible confidence; no single source sector is assigned.

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

U.S. EPA AirData hypothesis

Tulsa, Oklahoma measured pollution fingerprint, 2007-08-02

EPA records show a median daily PM2.5 value of 36.05 micrograms per cubic meter across 2 monitors during the event, compared with 21.65 before and 18 after. Same-window context included PM10 Total 0-10um STP null Micrograms/cubic meter (25 C), Carbon monoxide 0.6633 Parts per million, Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) 12.2645 Parts per billion, Sulfur dioxide 1.411 Parts per billion, Ozone 0.0395 Parts per million.

Inference, not direct attribution

documented_stagnation_overlap_possible.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Pattern-based explanation

    documented_stagnation_overlap_possible.v1. This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.

    Inferred
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The transport path has not been reconstructed

    The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.

    Research gap
  3. 3

    Local response

    38.5 µg/m³ near Tulsa

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 1.8 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Stagnant pollution mixture” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Tulsa, OK

Monitor comparison window 2007-07-30 to 2007-08-06 · PM2.5 target: TCCHD (OLD)

5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 36 µg/m³

70% above nearby days

Air movement 3 kt median wind

17 calm hours observed

What observers saw 2.5 mi minimum visibility

Haze reported during 18 hours

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 36 µg/m³

70% higher than surrounding days

Before21.6 µg/m³ Event36 µg/m³ After18 µg/m³
2 monitors · 24 HOUR
Carbon monoxide 0.663 ppm

42% higher than surrounding days

Before0.500 ppm Event0.663 ppm After0.318 ppm
2 monitors · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 12.3 ppb

30% higher than surrounding days

Before10.5 ppb Event12.3 ppb After5.71 ppb
1 monitor · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 1.41 ppb

About the same as surrounding days

Before0.977 ppb Event1.41 ppb After1.90 ppb
4 monitors · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.040 ppm

7% higher than surrounding days

Before0.032 ppm Event0.040 ppm After0.036 ppm
5 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

TULSA INTL ARPT(AW), 7.3 km from the PM2.5 target
Wind 3 kt median

11 kt maximum · 17 of 48 observed hours calm

Visibility 2.5 mi minimum

7 observed hours at or below 3 miles

Temperature 83.5°F median

72°F to 93°F

Humidity 68% median

91% maximum

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Tulsa, OK 38.5 µg/m³ 3.4 Aug 3, 2007 #11 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

4 retained sources

Official record

Area Forecast Discussion: haze persisted during the stagnant episode

National Weather Service via Iowa Environmental Mesonet

NWS Tulsa added haze to the local forecast on the second event day; the following discussion said haze had persisted for several days and stronger southerly flow would help disperse it.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

Haze is not source-specific and can include particles from multiple local and transported sources.

Official record

Area Forecast Discussion: the local pattern remained largely stagnant

National Weather Service via Iowa Environmental Mesonet

NWS Tulsa described the overall pattern as largely stagnant across its forecast area on the first event morning, with an upper ridge building over the area.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

The discussion documents the accumulation setting but does not identify the particle sources.

Official record

Tulsa, Oklahoma modeled aerosol fingerprint, 2007-08-02

U.S. EPA EQUATES CMAQ via Remote Sensing Information Gateway

EPA's retrospective 12-kilometer model reproduced an event-centered fine-mass increase of 1.6161 times adjacent modeled days. The modeled mixture was 56.2% organic matter, 36.2% secondary ions, 4.1% soil, and 1.3% elemental carbon.

What it supports

Context for the event; this item does not establish the attributed cause by itself.

Limit

EQUATES is a retrospective chemical-transport model, not a monitor observation or source-apportionment determination; it is retained as compatible composition context only.

Official record

Tulsa, Oklahoma measured pollution fingerprint, 2007-08-02

U.S. EPA AirData

EPA records show a median daily PM2.5 value of 36.05 micrograms per cubic meter across 2 monitors during the event, compared with 21.65 before and 18 after. Same-window context included PM10 Total 0-10um STP null Micrograms/cubic meter (25 C), Carbon monoxide 0.6633 Parts per million, Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) 12.2645 Parts per billion, Sulfur dioxide 1.411 Parts per billion, Ozone 0.0395 Parts per million.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

The measured fingerprint establishes the episode and co-pollutant pattern but cannot uniquely apportion its sources.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.