2005-09-12 to 2005-09-13 Birmingham-Hoover, AL stagnant mixed-pollution episode
September 12, 2005 to September 13, 2005
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 63 µg/m³ near Birmingham across
1 covered metro home to 1.2 million people.
1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 4.4 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 5.3 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Stagnant pollution mixture”
The exact-window NWS Birmingham discussion says air quality would worsen as the local air mass became stagnant under very light winds. Surface observations and the EPA pollution fingerprint independently confirm prolonged haze, weak flow, and elevated particles. No dominant exceptional source was identified.
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
National Weather Service Birmingham via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Sep 12, 2005corroborates
NWS Birmingham said haze would increase and air quality would worsen on September 12-13 as the local air mass became more moist and stagnant with very light winds. The following discussion described continued haze and light winds.
Certified EPA observations show median event-window PM2.5 of 53.4 micrograms per cubic meter across ten monitors and PM10 of 85.3 across four monitors, both above the preceding and following comparison windows; sulfur dioxide was also elevated.
NOAA/NWS surface observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet hypothesis
The Birmingham airport record contains 48 event hours: median wind was calm, 25 hours were calm, 33 were at or below 3 knots, and haze was coded during 20 hours.
Inference, not direct attribution
documented_stagnation_overlap_possible.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
NWS Birmingham said haze would increase and air quality would worsen on September 12-13 as the local air mass became more moist and stagnant with very light winds. The following discussion described continued haze and light winds.
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
63 µg/m³ near Birmingham
EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.9 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Stagnant pollution mixture” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Birmingham-Hoover, AL
Monitor comparison window 2005-09-09 to 2005-09-16 · PM2.5 target: North Birmingham
5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse53.4 µg/m³
37% above nearby days
PM1085.3 µg/m³
38% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.553.4 µg/m³
37% higher than surrounding days
Before33.5 µg/m³ Event53.4 µg/m³ After27.1 µg/m³
PM1085.3 µg/m³
38% higher than surrounding days
Before54 µg/m³ Event85.3 µg/m³ After61 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide1.02 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before1.05 ppm Event1.02 ppm After0.708 ppm
Sulfur dioxide11.6 ppb
76% higher than surrounding days
Before7.67 ppb Event11.6 ppb After1.83 ppb
Ozone0.040 ppm
19% higher than surrounding days
Before0.043 ppm Event0.040 ppm After0.028 ppm
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
3 retained sources
Official record
Area Forecast Discussion: worsening air quality in a stagnant local air mass
National Weather Service Birmingham via Iowa Environmental Mesonet
NWS Birmingham said haze would increase and air quality would worsen on September 12-13 as the local air mass became more moist and stagnant with very light winds. The following discussion described continued haze and light winds.
What it supports
A retained source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.
Limit
The discussion identifies the accumulation mechanism but not the particles' dominant emitting sources.
Official record
Birmingham multi-monitor pollution fingerprint, September 12-13, 2005
U.S. EPA AirData
Certified EPA observations show median event-window PM2.5 of 53.4 micrograms per cubic meter across ten monitors and PM10 of 85.3 across four monitors, both above the preceding and following comparison windows; sulfur dioxide was also elevated.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The fingerprint confirms a multi-pollutant episode but does not identify the dominant emissions source.
Official record
Birmingham surface observations during September 12-13, 2005
NOAA/NWS surface observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet
The Birmingham airport record contains 48 event hours: median wind was calm, 25 hours were calm, 33 were at or below 3 knots, and haze was coded during 20 hours.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The airport observations corroborate the weak-flow haze setting but do not identify a source.
What remains uncertain
The airport observations corroborate the weak-flow haze setting but do not identify a source.
The discussion identifies the accumulation mechanism but not the particles' dominant emitting sources.
The fingerprint confirms a multi-pollutant episode but does not identify the dominant emissions source.
Status and provenance
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.