← Air events

Stagnant pollution mixture Possible

2005-09-12 to 2005-09-13 Birmingham-Hoover, AL stagnant mixed-pollution episode

September 12, 2005 to September 13, 2005

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 63 µg/m³ near Birmingham across 1 covered metro home to 1.2 million people. 1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 4.4 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 5.3 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Stagnant pollution mixture”

The exact-window NWS Birmingham discussion says air quality would worsen as the local air mass became stagnant under very light winds. Surface observations and the EPA pollution fingerprint independently confirm prolonged haze, weak flow, and elevated particles. No dominant exceptional source was identified.

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

National Weather Service Birmingham via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Sep 12, 2005 corroborates

Area Forecast Discussion: worsening air quality in a stagnant local air mass

NWS Birmingham said haze would increase and air quality would worsen on September 12-13 as the local air mass became more moist and stagnant with very light winds. The following discussion described continued haze and light winds.

Inference, not direct attribution

documented_stagnation_overlap_possible.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Stagnant pollution mixture

    NWS Birmingham said haze would increase and air quality would worsen on September 12-13 as the local air mass became more moist and stagnant with very light winds. The following discussion described continued haze and light winds.

    View supporting source ↗
    Documented
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The transport path has not been reconstructed

    The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.

    Research gap
  3. 3

    Local response

    63 µg/m³ near Birmingham

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.9 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Stagnant pollution mixture” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Birmingham-Hoover, AL

Monitor comparison window 2005-09-09 to 2005-09-16 · PM2.5 target: North Birmingham

5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 53.4 µg/m³

37% above nearby days

PM10 85.3 µg/m³

38% higher than surrounding days

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 53.4 µg/m³

37% higher than surrounding days

Before33.5 µg/m³ Event53.4 µg/m³ After27.1 µg/m³
10 monitors · 24 HOUR
PM10 85.3 µg/m³

38% higher than surrounding days

Before54 µg/m³ Event85.3 µg/m³ After61 µg/m³
4 monitors · 24-HR BLK AVG
Carbon monoxide 1.02 ppm

About the same as surrounding days

Before1.05 ppm Event1.02 ppm After0.708 ppm
3 monitors · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 11.6 ppb

76% higher than surrounding days

Before7.67 ppb Event11.6 ppb After1.83 ppb
1 monitor · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.040 ppm

19% higher than surrounding days

Before0.043 ppm Event0.040 ppm After0.028 ppm
10 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Views from the selected metro

Camera views near

Browse the camera map →

Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Birmingham-Hoover, AL 63 µg/m³ 5.6 Sep 12, 2005 #4 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

3 retained sources

Official record

Area Forecast Discussion: worsening air quality in a stagnant local air mass

National Weather Service Birmingham via Iowa Environmental Mesonet

NWS Birmingham said haze would increase and air quality would worsen on September 12-13 as the local air mass became more moist and stagnant with very light winds. The following discussion described continued haze and light winds.

What it supports

A retained source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.

Limit

The discussion identifies the accumulation mechanism but not the particles' dominant emitting sources.

Official record

Birmingham multi-monitor pollution fingerprint, September 12-13, 2005

U.S. EPA AirData

Certified EPA observations show median event-window PM2.5 of 53.4 micrograms per cubic meter across ten monitors and PM10 of 85.3 across four monitors, both above the preceding and following comparison windows; sulfur dioxide was also elevated.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

The fingerprint confirms a multi-pollutant episode but does not identify the dominant emissions source.

Official record

Birmingham surface observations during September 12-13, 2005

NOAA/NWS surface observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet

The Birmingham airport record contains 48 event hours: median wind was calm, 25 hours were calm, 33 were at or below 3 knots, and haze was coded during 20 hours.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

The airport observations corroborate the weak-flow haze setting but do not identify a source.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.