2005-07-26 to 2005-07-27 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC, Charleston-North Charleston, SC, and 1 other metros stagnant mixed-pollution episode
July 26, 2005 to July 27, 2005
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 45.2 µg/m³ near Augusta across
3 covered metros home to 2.4 million people.
1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 2.0 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 4.9 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Stagnant pollution mixture”
NASA's exact-date satellite narrative describes hot, humid, stagnant air and widespread haze from Pennsylvania to Georgia, including EPA particle warnings across the Southeast. It identifies high pressure trapping accumulating emissions from vehicles, power plants, and fires as the episode mechanism.
LikelyApplicable reporting or a supported inference makes this the best current causal explanation.
NASA's July 26 imagery and narrative document hot, humid, stagnant air, particle warnings across the Southeast, and haze along the coast from Pennsylvania to Georgia. The assessment identifies high pressure trapping accumulating emissions from vehicles, power plants, and fires.
Sequence: Columbia (Jul 26) → Augusta (Jul 27) → Charleston (Jul 27)
Evidence path
From source to city
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
NASA's July 26 imagery and narrative document hot, humid, stagnant air, particle warnings across the Southeast, and haze along the coast from Pennsylvania to Georgia. The assessment identifies high pressure trapping accumulating emissions from…
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
45.2 µg/m³ near Augusta
EPA monitors recorded the event across 3 metros.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.1 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Stagnant pollution mixture” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Columbia, SC
Monitor comparison window 2005-07-23 to 2005-07-30 · PM2.5 target: BATES HOUSE
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse40.5 µg/m³
43% above nearby days
Air movement3.19 kt
9% higher than surrounding days
PM1055.8 µg/m³
34% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.540.5 µg/m³
43% higher than surrounding days
Before24.6 µg/m³ Event40.5 µg/m³ After18.5 µg/m³
PM1055.8 µg/m³
34% higher than surrounding days
Before37.5 µg/m³ Event55.8 µg/m³ After26 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.727 ppm
34% higher than surrounding days
Before0.454 ppm Event0.727 ppm After0.383 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide5.08 ppb
20% higher than surrounding days
Before4.04 ppb Event5.08 ppb After6.92 ppb
Sulfur dioxide1.95 ppb
61% higher than surrounding days
Before1.10 ppb Event1.95 ppb After1.04 ppb
Ozone0.052 ppm
36% higher than surrounding days
Before0.037 ppm Event0.052 ppm After0.035 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Wind3.19 kt
9% higher than surrounding days
Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC
Monitor comparison window 2005-07-23 to 2005-07-30 · PM2.5 target: Augusta
4 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse42.5 µg/m³
27% above nearby days
PM1058.5 µg/m³
No adjacent-day comparison
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.542.5 µg/m³
27% higher than surrounding days
Before33.6 µg/m³ Event42.5 µg/m³ After14.3 µg/m³
PM1058.5 µg/m³
No adjacent-day comparison
Before— Event58.5 µg/m³ After—
Nitrogen dioxide2.58 ppb
9% higher than surrounding days
Before2.04 ppb Event2.58 ppb After2.46 ppb
Ozone0.043 ppm
21% higher than surrounding days
Before0.035 ppm Event0.043 ppm After0.024 ppm
Charleston-North Charleston, SC
Monitor comparison window 2005-07-23 to 2005-07-30 · PM2.5 target: CHARLESTON PUBLIC WORKS
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse37.5 µg/m³
56% above nearby days
Air movement2.76 kt
17% higher than surrounding days
PM1042.5 µg/m³
37% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.537.5 µg/m³
56% higher than surrounding days
Before23 µg/m³ Event37.5 µg/m³ After11.8 µg/m³
PM1042.5 µg/m³
37% higher than surrounding days
Before29 µg/m³ Event42.5 µg/m³ After20 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.252 ppm
11% higher than surrounding days
Before0.225 ppm Event0.252 ppm After0.237 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide6.92 ppb
About the same as surrounding days
Before6.50 ppb Event6.92 ppb After6.79 ppb
Sulfur dioxide1.38 ppb
7% higher than surrounding days
Before1.23 ppb Event1.38 ppb After0.625 ppb
Ozone0.043 ppm
13% higher than surrounding days
Before0.037 ppm Event0.043 ppm After0.027 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Wind2.76 kt
17% higher than surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
1 retained source
Official record
Haze Across Eastern United States
NASA Earth Observatory
NASA's July 26 imagery and narrative document hot, humid, stagnant air, particle warnings across the Southeast, and haze along the coast from Pennsylvania to Georgia. The assessment identifies high pressure trapping accumulating emissions from vehicles, power plants, and fires.
What it supports
An official source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.
Limit
The assessment describes a mixed regional episode and does not apportion the daily PM2.5 among the listed emissions categories.
What remains uncertain
The regional cause is supported, but no single source or facility can be named.
Status and provenance
LikelyApplicable reporting or a supported inference makes this the best current causal explanation.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.