← Air events

Stagnant pollution mixture Possible

2005-01-12 Winston-Salem, NC stagnant mixed-pollution episode

January 12, 2005

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 44.3 µg/m³ near Winston across 1 covered metro home to 705,187 people.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 1.5 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 1.1 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Stagnant pollution mixture”

Exact-date NWS and nearby surface observations document stagnant air, light winds, and haze during a five-monitor PM2.5 episode with elevated combustion tracers. The evidence supports a possible trapped anthropogenic mixture but not a specific source allocation.

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

NOAA/NWS surface observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Jan 12, 2005 hypothesis

Winston-Salem surface conditions, January 12, 2005

The Winston-Salem airport, about 2.5 km from the Hattie Avenue PM2.5 monitor, reported haze during six local hours. The daily median wind was about 4.5 knots, with one calm hour and four hours at or below 3 knots; visibility was 3 miles or less for eight hours.

National Weather Service Raleigh via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Jan 12, 2005 hypothesis

Area Forecast Discussion: stagnant air and light to calm wind

Early on January 12, NWS Raleigh described light to mostly calm winds and stagnant air across central North Carolina, with radiational cooling and thickening fog expected toward daybreak. It expected winds to strengthen later as the pressure gradient tightened.

U.S. EPA AirData hypothesis

Winston-Salem pollution fingerprint, January 9–15, 2005

IAQng's reproducible EPA-row aggregation found a metro-wide particle episode on January 12: the five-monitor PM2.5 median was 44.3 µg/m³ versus 16.5 before and 8.6 after, while PM10 was 31.5 µg/m³. CO and NO2 were also above their surrounding-window medians, consistent with accumulated combustion pollution rather than an isolated PM2.5-only reading.

Inference, not direct attribution

documented_stagnation_overlap_possible.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Pattern-based explanation

    documented_stagnation_overlap_possible.v1. This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.

    Inferred
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The transport path has not been reconstructed

    The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.

    Research gap
  3. 3

    Local response

    44.3 µg/m³ near Winston

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.0 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Stagnant pollution mixture” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Winston-Salem, NC

Monitor comparison window 2005-01-09 to 2005-01-15 · PM2.5 target: Hattie Avenue

5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 44.3 µg/m³

334% above nearby days

Air movement 4.45 kt

About the same as surrounding days

PM10 31.5 µg/m³

97% higher than surrounding days

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 44.3 µg/m³

334% higher than surrounding days

Before16.5 µg/m³ Event44.3 µg/m³ After8.60 µg/m³
5 monitors · 24 HOUR
PM10 31.5 µg/m³

97% higher than surrounding days

Before19 µg/m³ Event31.5 µg/m³ After10 µg/m³
2 monitors · 24-HR BLK AVG
Carbon monoxide 1.17 ppm

64% higher than surrounding days

Before0.912 ppm Event1.17 ppm After0.613 ppm
1 monitor · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 18.6 ppb

103% higher than surrounding days

Before17 ppb Event18.6 ppb After7.21 ppb
1 monitor · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 5.77 ppb

About the same as surrounding days

Before5.92 ppb Event5.77 ppb After3.54 ppb
1 monitor · 1 HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity 52.3 °F

27% higher than surrounding days

Temperature 58.4 °F

15% higher than surrounding days

Wind 4.45 kt

About the same as surrounding days

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Views from the selected metro

Camera views near

Browse the camera map →

Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Winston-Salem, NC 44.3 µg/m³ 2.0 Jan 12, 2005 #17 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

3 retained sources

Official record

Winston-Salem surface conditions, January 12, 2005

NOAA/NWS surface observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet

The Winston-Salem airport, about 2.5 km from the Hattie Avenue PM2.5 monitor, reported haze during six local hours. The daily median wind was about 4.5 knots, with one calm hour and four hours at or below 3 knots; visibility was 3 miles or less for eight hours.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

Haze and reduced visibility corroborate the local accumulation setting but do not identify the particle sources.

Official record

Area Forecast Discussion: stagnant air and light to calm wind

National Weather Service Raleigh via Iowa Environmental Mesonet

Early on January 12, NWS Raleigh described light to mostly calm winds and stagnant air across central North Carolina, with radiational cooling and thickening fog expected toward daybreak. It expected winds to strengthen later as the pressure gradient tightened.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

The discussion documents a trapping setting early in the day, not a specific emissions source or an all-day stagnant period.

Official record

Winston-Salem pollution fingerprint, January 9–15, 2005

U.S. EPA AirData

IAQng's reproducible EPA-row aggregation found a metro-wide particle episode on January 12: the five-monitor PM2.5 median was 44.3 µg/m³ versus 16.5 before and 8.6 after, while PM10 was 31.5 µg/m³. CO and NO2 were also above their surrounding-window medians, consistent with accumulated combustion pollution rather than an isolated PM2.5-only reading.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

The measurements identify a mixed accumulation episode but do not apportion it among traffic, industry, residential combustion, or other sources.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.