← Air events

Stagnant pollution mixture Possible

2003-06-26 to 2003-06-27 Providence-Warwick, RI-MA stagnant mixed-pollution episode

June 26, 2003 to June 27, 2003

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 60.2 µg/m³ near Providence across 1 covered metro home to 1.7 million people. 1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 4.0 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 6.8 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Stagnant pollution mixture”

EPA identified an ongoing southern New England fine-particle episode covering Rhode Island and metropolitan Boston, said it began Tuesday, and expected a Friday-night cold front to end it. The retained scope and limitations support possible confidence for this local episode.

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

Inference, not direct attribution

documented_particle_episode_weather_accumulation_possible.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Pattern-based explanation

    documented_particle_episode_weather_accumulation_possible.v1. This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.

    Inferred
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The transport path has not been reconstructed

    The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.

    Research gap
  3. 3

    Local response

    60.2 µg/m³ near Providence

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.7 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Stagnant pollution mixture” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Providence-Warwick, RI-MA

Monitor comparison window 2003-06-23 to 2003-06-30 · PM2.5 target: CCRI Liston Campus ROOFTOP

6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 42.8 µg/m³

91% above nearby days

PM10 57 µg/m³

No adjacent-day comparison

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 42.8 µg/m³

91% higher than surrounding days

Before17.6 µg/m³ Event42.8 µg/m³ After15.8 µg/m³
5 monitors · 24 HOUR
PM10 57 µg/m³

No adjacent-day comparison

Before Event57 µg/m³ After
4 monitors · 24 HOUR
Carbon monoxide 0.861 ppm

34% higher than surrounding days

Before0.694 ppm Event0.861 ppm After0.490 ppm
2 monitors · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 11.7 ppb

9% higher than surrounding days

Before11.8 ppb Event11.7 ppb After10.3 ppb
2 monitors · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 3.21 ppb

15% higher than surrounding days

Before2.46 ppb Event3.21 ppb After2.14 ppb
3 monitors · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.087 ppm

46% higher than surrounding days

Before0.062 ppm Event0.087 ppm After0.055 ppm
4 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity 74.3 %

About the same as surrounding days

Pressure 1007 Millibars

About the same as surrounding days

Temperature 78.9 °F

8% higher than surrounding days

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Views from the selected metro

Camera views near

Browse the camera map →

Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Providence-Warwick, RI-MA 60.2 µg/m³ 4.8 Jun 27, 2003 #2 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

1 retained source

Official record

Poor Air Quality Predicted to Continue in Several New England Areas on Friday, June 27

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

EPA identified an ongoing southern New England fine-particle episode covering Rhode Island and metropolitan Boston, said it began Tuesday, and expected a Friday-night cold front to end it.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

EPA lists general particle sources but does not directly apportion this episode.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.