2003-06-26 to 2003-06-27 Providence-Warwick, RI-MA stagnant mixed-pollution episode
June 26, 2003 to June 27, 2003
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 60.2 µg/m³ near Providence across
1 covered metro home to 1.7 million people.
1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 4.0 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 6.8 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Stagnant pollution mixture”
EPA identified an ongoing southern New England fine-particle episode covering Rhode Island and metropolitan Boston, said it began Tuesday, and expected a Friday-night cold front to end it. The retained scope and limitations support possible confidence for this local episode.
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency · Jun 26, 2003hypothesis
EPA identified an ongoing southern New England fine-particle episode covering Rhode Island and metropolitan Boston, said it began Tuesday, and expected a Friday-night cold front to end it.
Inference, not direct attribution
documented_particle_episode_weather_accumulation_possible.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
documented_particle_episode_weather_accumulation_possible.v1. This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.
Inferred
2
Air-mass movement
The transport path has not been reconstructed
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
60.2 µg/m³ near Providence
EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.7 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Stagnant pollution mixture” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
1 retained source
Official record
Poor Air Quality Predicted to Continue in Several New England Areas on Friday, June 27
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EPA identified an ongoing southern New England fine-particle episode covering Rhode Island and metropolitan Boston, said it began Tuesday, and expected a Friday-night cold front to end it.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
EPA lists general particle sources but does not directly apportion this episode.
What remains uncertain
EPA lists general particle sources but does not directly apportion this episode.
Status and provenance
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.