2003-06-24 to 2003-06-26 Pittsburgh, PA stagnant mixed-pollution episode
June 24, 2003 to June 26, 2003
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 85.2 µg/m³ near Pittsburgh across
1 covered metro home to 2.4 million people.
1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 8.9 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 22 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Stagnant pollution mixture”
Exact-date official records place Pittsburgh inside a broad western Pennsylvania photochemical episode while an upper ridge held hot, dry weather over the Ohio Valley. This supports a possible accumulated anthropogenic mixture but does not resolve the particle sources.
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection · Jan 1, 2004hypothesis
Pennsylvania DEP recorded a June 24 regional ozone exceedance across Pittsburgh and eight other western Pennsylvania sites, confirming that the PM2.5 event began during a broad regional photochemical-pollution episode.
National Weather Service Pittsburgh via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Jun 24, 2003hypothesis
NWS Pittsburgh reported dry conditions with an upper ridge holding over the Ohio Valley through late June 26 and temperatures near 90 degrees during the event window.
Inference, not direct attribution
coincident_regional_photochemical_episode_possible.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
coincident_regional_photochemical_episode_possible.v1. This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.
Inferred
2
Air-mass movement
The transport path has not been reconstructed
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
85.2 µg/m³ near Pittsburgh
EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 3.9 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Stagnant pollution mixture” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Pittsburgh, PA
Monitor comparison window 2003-06-21 to 2003-06-29 · PM2.5 target: Liberty
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse55.4 µg/m³
119% above nearby days
PM1073 µg/m³
109% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.555.4 µg/m³
119% higher than surrounding days
Before11.4 µg/m³ Event55.4 µg/m³ After25.3 µg/m³
PM1073 µg/m³
109% higher than surrounding days
Before15.5 µg/m³ Event73 µg/m³ After29 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.429 ppm
171% higher than surrounding days
Before0.125 ppm Event0.429 ppm After0.115 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide18.4 ppb
44% higher than surrounding days
Before10.2 ppb Event18.4 ppb After11.3 ppb
Sulfur dioxide14 ppb
64% higher than surrounding days
Before4.63 ppb Event14 ppb After10.4 ppb
Ozone0.065 ppm
29% higher than surrounding days
Before0.034 ppm Event0.065 ppm After0.047 ppm
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
2 retained sources
Official record
2003 Annual Air Quality Report: June 24 western Pennsylvania ozone exceedances
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
Pennsylvania DEP recorded a June 24 regional ozone exceedance across Pittsburgh and eight other western Pennsylvania sites, confirming that the PM2.5 event began during a broad regional photochemical-pollution episode.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
An ozone exceedance is not a PM2.5 source determination.
Official record
Area Forecast Discussion: upper ridge holding over the Ohio Valley
National Weather Service Pittsburgh via Iowa Environmental Mesonet
NWS Pittsburgh reported dry conditions with an upper ridge holding over the Ohio Valley through late June 26 and temperatures near 90 degrees during the event window.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The discussion does not explicitly use the word stagnation and does not attribute the PM2.5 measurement.
What remains uncertain
No exact-date PM2.5 composition or direct causal news report was recovered.
Status and provenance
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.