Daily PM2.5 peaked at 57.8 µg/m³ near Philadelphia across
1 covered metro home to 6.3 million people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 2.0 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 13 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Stagnant pollution mixture”
The NEOPS-DEP field campaign identifies July 1-3 as a Philadelphia pollution episode: stagnation and recirculation developed July 1, then a hazy polluted air mass was advected over Philadelphia on July 2 as visibility abruptly fell. The retained scope and limitations support possible confidence for this local episode.
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
Penn State and Millersville University / Pennsylvania DEP corroborates
The NEOPS-DEP field campaign identifies July 1-3 as a Philadelphia pollution episode: stagnation and recirculation developed July 1, then a hazy polluted air mass was advected over Philadelphia on July 2 as visibility abruptly fell.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
The NEOPS-DEP field campaign identifies July 1-3 as a Philadelphia pollution episode: stagnation and recirculation developed July 1, then a hazy polluted air mass was advected over Philadelphia on July 2 as visibility abruptly fell.
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
57.8 µg/m³ near Philadelphia
EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.6 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Stagnant pollution mixture” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD
Monitor comparison window 2002-06-29 to 2002-07-05 · PM2.5 target: Newark PARKING LOT LAIRD CAMPUS
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse44.7 µg/m³
108% above nearby days
Air movement229 Degrees Compass
About the same as surrounding days
PM1064 µg/m³
83% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.544.7 µg/m³
108% higher than surrounding days
Before20.4 µg/m³ Event44.7 µg/m³ After26.9 µg/m³
PM1064 µg/m³
83% higher than surrounding days
Before32 µg/m³ Event64 µg/m³ After46 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.483 ppm
33% higher than surrounding days
Before0.342 ppm Event0.483 ppm After0.362 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide25.3 ppb
54% higher than surrounding days
Before16.4 ppb Event25.3 ppb After14.3 ppb
Sulfur dioxide7.35 ppb
129% higher than surrounding days
Before2.75 ppb Event7.35 ppb After3.21 ppb
Ozone0.079 ppm
46% higher than surrounding days
Before0.051 ppm Event0.079 ppm After0.054 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity76.4 %
10% higher than surrounding days
Pressure1028 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature84 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Wind229 Degrees Compass
About the same as surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
1 retained source
Scientific research
Summary of Meteorological Conditions During the NEOPS-DEP July 2002 Intensive Observing Period
Penn State and Millersville University / Pennsylvania DEP
The NEOPS-DEP field campaign identifies July 1-3 as a Philadelphia pollution episode: stagnation and recirculation developed July 1, then a hazy polluted air mass was advected over Philadelphia on July 2 as visibility abruptly fell.
What it supports
A retained source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.
Limit
The report documents the pollution episode and transport mechanism but does not isolate a PM2.5 source contribution for the daily city aggregate.
What remains uncertain
The report documents the pollution episode and transport mechanism but does not isolate a PM2.5 source contribution for the daily city aggregate.
Status and provenance
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.