Stagnant pollution mixture Possible
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 51.3 µg/m³ near Akron across 2 covered metros home to 2.9 million people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 1.7 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 4.9 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.
Why we think this happened
Manual research connected 2 source events to one stagnant mixed-pollution episode using the deterministic grouping rule.
Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency / Federal Register · Jan 30, 2004 official
EPA describes a combination of human-made pollutants and some smoke during June 20-28, 2002, with aerosol buildup in the Midwest from June 20-22 before transport across the Northeast.
National Weather Service Indianapolis via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Jun 21, 2002 hypothesis
The same-day NWS discussion describes a stagnant air mass over central Indiana.
See every retained source and limitation ↓
Sequence: Indianapolis (Jun 21) → Akron (Jun 22)
Evidence path
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.
Source or mechanism
EPA describes a combination of human-made pollutants and some smoke during June 20-28, 2002, with aerosol buildup in the Midwest from June 20-22 before transport across the Northeast.
View supporting source ↗Air-mass movement
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Local response
EPA monitors recorded the event across 2 metros. The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.3 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓Event autopsy
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Stagnant pollution mixture” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.
Akron, OH
Monitor comparison window 2002-06-19 to 2002-06-25 · PM2.5 target: East HS
27% above nearby days
15% higher than surrounding days
27% higher than surrounding days
15% higher than surrounding days
About the same as surrounding days
About the same as surrounding days
23% higher than surrounding days
Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN
Monitor comparison window 2002-06-18 to 2002-06-24 · PM2.5 target: Indpls- Washington Park/ in parking lot next to police station
49% above nearby days
35% higher than surrounding days
49% higher than surrounding days
35% higher than surrounding days
38% higher than surrounding days
16% higher than surrounding days
7% higher than surrounding days
About the same as surrounding days
About the same as surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Episode peak
-- cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Views from the selected metro
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
| Metro | Peak PM2.5 | Cigarettes, whole event | Peak day | All-time standing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akron, OH | 51.3 µg/m³ | 2.3 | Jun 22, 2002 | #12 of its top days |
| Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN | 50 µg/m³ | 2.3 | Jun 21, 2002 | #25 of its top days |
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency / Federal Register
EPA describes a combination of human-made pollutants and some smoke during June 20-28, 2002, with aerosol buildup in the Midwest from June 20-22 before transport across the Northeast.
An official source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.
The narrative is regional and does not apportion the daily PM2.5 mass at either metro.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency / Federal Register
EPA describes a combination of human-made pollutants and some smoke during June 20-28, 2002, with aerosol buildup in the Midwest from June 20-22 before transport across the Northeast.
An official source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.
The narrative is regional and does not apportion the daily PM2.5 mass at either metro.
National Weather Service Indianapolis via Iowa Environmental Mesonet
The same-day NWS discussion describes a stagnant air mass over central Indiana.
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
The discussion identifies stagnation but does not identify individual emissions sources.
Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.