Daily PM2.5 peaked at 40.1 µg/m³ near Houston across
1 covered metro home to 7.8 million people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 1.3 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 9.8 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Stagnant pollution mixture”
A broad 13-monitor PM2.5 increase coincided with higher PM10, CO, ozone, and SO2, reduced wind, and high pressure. This supports accumulation of a mixed anthropogenic pollution burden, but the available record cannot apportion sources. Two same-day Baytown flares are retained as possible contributors only because neither incident report establishes a particulate plume or monitor impact.
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
IAQng's reproducible aggregation of EPA records found a broad Houston episode across 13 PM2.5 monitors. Median PM2.5 was 32.7 ug/m3, versus 10.9 before; PM10, CO, ozone, and SO2 also rose. Median wind speed fell to 3.52 knots from 5.88 knots before the event, while pressure remained high near 1023 mb.
Inference, not direct attribution
low_wind_high_pressure_multimonitor.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Stagnant pollution mixture” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Air-mass reconstruction
Where the air had been
NOAA HYSPLIT traces the air arriving at each metro backward for 72 hours. Multiple
arrival times and heights show whether the broad path is stable—or sensitive to
assumptions about when and where the polluted layer arrived.
Transport context · not source attribution
Air arriving near Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land
Peak-date arrivals · 2001-11-18
Broad historyMostly northeast of the metro
72-hour reach550–1,100 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
3 retained sources
Official record
National Response Center incident report 586439
U.S. Coast Guard National Response Center
NRC report 586439 records a Chevron Phillips Baytown process-unit shutdown and flare on November 18, with 25 pounds of nitrogen oxide reported released to air.
What it supports
Context for the event; this item does not establish the attributed cause by itself.
Limit
The report establishes a same-day industrial occurrence, not its contribution to the metro-wide daily PM2.5 response.
Official record
National Response Center incident report 586369
U.S. Coast Guard National Response Center
NRC report 586369 records an ExxonMobil Baytown compressor trip and flare on November 18, with 200 pounds of 1,3-butadiene reported released to air.
What it supports
Context for the event; this item does not establish the attributed cause by itself.
Limit
The report establishes a same-day industrial occurrence, not its contribution to the metro-wide daily PM2.5 response.
Official record
Houston multi-monitor pollution fingerprint, November 18, 2001
U.S. EPA AirData
IAQng's reproducible aggregation of EPA records found a broad Houston episode across 13 PM2.5 monitors. Median PM2.5 was 32.7 ug/m3, versus 10.9 before; PM10, CO, ozone, and SO2 also rose. Median wind speed fell to 3.52 knots from 5.88 knots before the event, while pressure remained high near 1023 mb.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The fingerprint supports regional accumulation of a mixed pollution burden; it does not apportion sources or prove that the reported flares caused the PM2.5 increase.
What remains uncertain
No exact-date forecast discussion or chemical source-apportionment sample was recovered.
The two Baytown flare reports remain possible contributors, not established causes of the regional PM2.5 episode.
Status and provenance
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.