2001-07-20 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI stagnant mixed-pollution episode
July 20, 2001
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 47.7 µg/m³ near Grand Rapids across
1 covered metro home to 1.2 million people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 1.7 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 2.0 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Stagnant pollution mixture”
An exact-day, place-matched NWS discussion documents a stagnant southwest Michigan pattern with weak wind fields. The source mixture is not identified, so the estimate remains possible.
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
National Weather Service Grand Rapids via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Jul 20, 2001hypothesis
The exact-day Grand Rapids forecast discussion said a stagnant pattern continued across southwest Michigan with weak wind fields and expected the pattern to persist through the event day.
Inference, not direct attribution
documented_stagnation_overlap_possible.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
documented_stagnation_overlap_possible.v1. This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.
Inferred
2
Air-mass movement
The transport path has not been reconstructed
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
47.7 µg/m³ near Grand Rapids
EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.2 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Stagnant pollution mixture” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI
Monitor comparison window 2001-07-17 to 2001-07-23 · PM2.5 target: GR-MONROE
4 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse47.7 µg/m³
36% above nearby days
Air movement2.29 kt
8% lower than surrounding days
Carbon monoxide0.438 ppm
42% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.547.7 µg/m³
36% higher than surrounding days
Before37 µg/m³ Event47.7 µg/m³ After23.1 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.438 ppm
42% higher than surrounding days
Before0.309 ppm Event0.438 ppm After0.250 ppm
Sulfur dioxide2.50 ppb
22% higher than surrounding days
Before2.13 ppb Event2.50 ppb After0.917 ppb
Ozone0.050 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.058 ppm Event0.050 ppm After0.044 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Pressure993 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature80.4 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Wind2.29 kt
8% lower than surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
1 retained source
Official record
Area Forecast Discussion: stagnant pattern and weak winds in southwest Michigan
National Weather Service Grand Rapids via Iowa Environmental Mesonet
The exact-day Grand Rapids forecast discussion said a stagnant pattern continued across southwest Michigan with weak wind fields and expected the pattern to persist through the event day.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The discussion documents locally relevant stagnation but does not identify the particles accumulated in the air mass.
What remains uncertain
No exact-day composition measurement or dominant source narrative was recovered.
Status and provenance
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.