← Air events

Stagnant pollution mixture Possible

2000-11-25 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA stagnant mixed-pollution episode

November 25, 2000

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 87.5 µg/m³ near Los Angeles across 1 covered metro home to 13 million people.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 3.3 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 42 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Stagnant pollution mixture”

The same-day NWS observation directly documents basin-wide haze and fog with minimal offshore flow under a flat ridge. In the absence of a discrete transported source, a stagnant urban mixture is the most defensible mechanism estimate.

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

Inference, not direct attribution

documented_stagnation_overlap_possible.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Pattern-based explanation

    documented_stagnation_overlap_possible.v1. This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.

    Inferred
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The transport path has not been reconstructed

    The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.

    Research gap
  3. 3

    Local response

    87.5 µg/m³ near Los Angeles

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 4.0 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Stagnant pollution mixture” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA

Monitor comparison window 2000-11-22 to 2000-11-28 · PM2.5 target: Anaheim (1010 Harbor Blvd)

6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 64.6 µg/m³

37% above nearby days

PM10 33 µg/m³

14% higher than surrounding days

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 64.6 µg/m³

37% higher than surrounding days

Before31.5 µg/m³ Event64.6 µg/m³ After47.3 µg/m³
10 monitors · 24 HOUR
PM10 33 µg/m³

14% higher than surrounding days

Before23 µg/m³ Event33 µg/m³ After29 µg/m³
1 monitor · 24-HR BLK AVG
Carbon monoxide 2.24 ppm

12% higher than surrounding days

Before1.32 ppm Event2.24 ppm After2.35 ppm
17 monitors · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 50.9 ppb

7% higher than surrounding days

Before34.8 ppb Event50.9 ppb After63.2 ppb
16 monitors · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 2.83 ppb

6% lower than surrounding days

Before1.91 ppb Event2.83 ppb After3.87 ppb
5 monitors · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.010 ppm

About the same as surrounding days

Before0.011 ppm Event0.010 ppm After0.008 ppm
18 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity 62.5 %

About the same as surrounding days

Pressure 29.7 Millibars

About the same as surrounding days

Temperature 58.8 °F

About the same as surrounding days

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA 87.5 µg/m³ 4.0 Nov 25, 2000 #15 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

1 retained source

Official record

Area Forecast Discussion: considerable Los Angeles Basin haze under weak flow

National Weather Service Los Angeles/Oxnard via Iowa Environmental Mesonet

NWS Los Angeles/Oxnard observed considerable haze and fog across the Los Angeles Basin and valleys while offshore flow remained minimal under a flat ridge.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

The archive observes haze and weak ventilation but does not chemically apportion the particles.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.