1999-08-12 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA stagnant mixed-pollution episode
August 12, 1999
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 59.1 µg/m³ near Atlanta across
1 covered metro home to 6.4 million people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 2.1 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 14 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Stagnant pollution mixture”
The Atlanta Supersite measured an exact-date PM2.5 peak on August 12 during a documented August 3-23 stagnant regime. The field study attributed that regime to high pressure and weak dispersion, with local carbonaceous accumulation at low wind speeds and transported sulfate during the day. This supports a mixed accumulated-pollution mechanism, but not a single emitting source.
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
U.S. EPA Atlanta Supersite / Journal of Geophysical Research · Jan 1, 2003corroborates
The study identifies August 12 as a local PM2.5 maximum inside a prolonged August 3-23 stagnant regime. It reports weak synoptic dispersion, accumulation of local carbonaceous emissions during low-wind periods, and sulfate-dominated periods consistent with transport from more distant sources.
Inference, not direct attribution
exact_date_field_study_mixed_accumulation_possible.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
The study identifies August 12 as a local PM2.5 maximum inside a prolonged August 3-23 stagnant regime. It reports weak synoptic dispersion, accumulation of local carbonaceous emissions during low-wind periods, and sulfate-dominated periods…
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
59.1 µg/m³ near Atlanta
EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.7 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Stagnant pollution mixture” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA
Monitor comparison window 1999-08-09 to 1999-08-15 · PM2.5 target: South DeKalb
5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse41.3 µg/m³
24% above nearby days
Carbon monoxide1.05 ppm
48% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.541.3 µg/m³
24% higher than surrounding days
Before36.3 µg/m³ Event41.3 µg/m³ After19.1 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide1.05 ppm
48% higher than surrounding days
Before0.713 ppm Event1.05 ppm After0.473 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide17.1 ppb
19% higher than surrounding days
Before15.2 ppb Event17.1 ppb After6.44 ppb
Sulfur dioxide3.71 ppb
7% lower than surrounding days
Before6.17 ppb Event3.71 ppb After3.54 ppb
Ozone0.066 ppm
22% higher than surrounding days
Before0.053 ppm Event0.066 ppm After0.054 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity71 %
About the same as surrounding days
Pressure981 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature84.2 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
1 retained source
Scientific research
Overview of the 1999 Atlanta Supersite Project
U.S. EPA Atlanta Supersite / Journal of Geophysical Research
The study identifies August 12 as a local PM2.5 maximum inside a prolonged August 3-23 stagnant regime. It reports weak synoptic dispersion, accumulation of local carbonaceous emissions during low-wind periods, and sulfate-dominated periods consistent with transport from more distant sources.
What it supports
A retained source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.
Limit
The paper supports a mixed accumulation mechanism and regional/local source pattern, not a unique source or named incident.
What remains uncertain
The field study establishes the accumulation regime and mixture but does not isolate one source for the catalog day.
Status and provenance
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.