1999-08-04 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA stagnant mixed-pollution episode
August 4, 1999
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 61.6 µg/m³ near Atlanta across
1 covered metro home to 6.4 million people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 2.2 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 14 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Stagnant pollution mixture”
Exact-window Atlanta Supersite measurements show a sulfate-and-organic-particle mixture during a high-pressure, weak-wind regime, with local carbon accumulation and transported sulfate both contributing. This supports a stagnant anthropogenic mixture at possible confidence.
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
Journal of Geophysical Research · Apr 16, 2003corroborates
The August 3-4 integrated sample contained substantial sulfate and organic carbon, and the campaign analysis describes weak synoptic gradients and low winds that accumulated local carbon while afternoon sulfate reflected more distant transport.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
The August 3-4 integrated sample contained substantial sulfate and organic carbon, and the campaign analysis describes weak synoptic gradients and low winds that accumulated local carbon while afternoon sulfate reflected more distant transport.
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
61.6 µg/m³ near Atlanta
EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.8 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Stagnant pollution mixture” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA
Monitor comparison window 1999-08-01 to 1999-08-07 · PM2.5 target: South DeKalb
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse40.4 µg/m³
8% above nearby days
PM1049 µg/m³
No adjacent-day comparison
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.540.4 µg/m³
8% higher than surrounding days
Before29.3 µg/m³ Event40.4 µg/m³ After37.4 µg/m³
PM1049 µg/m³
No adjacent-day comparison
Before— Event49 µg/m³ After—
Carbon monoxide0.740 ppm
14% higher than surrounding days
Before0.531 ppm Event0.740 ppm After0.769 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide27.4 ppb
15% higher than surrounding days
Before16.6 ppb Event27.4 ppb After26.7 ppb
Sulfur dioxide4.17 ppb
About the same as surrounding days
Before4.30 ppb Event4.17 ppb After6.38 ppb
Ozone0.065 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.058 ppm Event0.065 ppm After0.066 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity70 %
About the same as surrounding days
Pressure981 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature78.7 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
2 retained sources
Scientific research
Discrete measurements of reactive gases and fine particle mass and composition during the 1999 Atlanta Supersite Experiment
Journal of Geophysical Research
The August 3-4 integrated sample contained substantial sulfate and organic carbon, and the campaign analysis describes weak synoptic gradients and low winds that accumulated local carbon while afternoon sulfate reflected more distant transport.
What it supports
A retained source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.
Limit
The study's integrated sample overlaps the candidate date but does not reproduce IAQng's exact metro-day aggregation or identify one emitting facility.
Scientific research
NARSTO EPA Supersite: Atlanta 1999 chemistry, PM and meteorology data
NASA ASDC
The Atlanta Supersite field campaign collected detailed chemistry and meteorology during the August 4, 1999 event window.
What it supports
Context for the event; this item does not establish the attributed cause by itself.
Limit
Coverage is not itself a causal attribution.
What remains uncertain
The classification describes an aerosol mechanism and mixture; it does not identify one discrete incident or quantify every source category.
Status and provenance
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.