Daily PM2.5 peaked at 63 µg/m³ near Philadelphia across
1 covered metro home to 6.3 million people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 2.3 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 14 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Regional secondary PM”
An official exact-date map places Philadelphia within a broad eastern PM2.5 episode, and the Mid-Atlantic planning assessment says the region's spatially coherent summer peaks are primarily secondary sulfate under slow-moving high pressure and stagnation. This supports regional secondary PM at possible confidence.
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
The binational progress report preserves an eastern U.S. PM2.5 map for July 11, 2006 that places Philadelphia inside a broader regional pollution episode.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
The catalog has a grouping hypothesis, but no retained source directly establishes the proposed cause.
Open question
2
Air-mass movement
The transport path has not been reconstructed
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
63 µg/m³ near Philadelphia
EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.9 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Regional secondary PM” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD
Monitor comparison window 2006-07-08 to 2006-07-14 · PM2.5 target: COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES (CHS)
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse37.7 µg/m³
85% above nearby days
Air movement5.27 kt
8% higher than surrounding days
PM1046.5 µg/m³
127% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.537.7 µg/m³
85% higher than surrounding days
Before17.3 µg/m³ Event37.7 µg/m³ After20.4 µg/m³
PM1046.5 µg/m³
127% higher than surrounding days
Before20.5 µg/m³ Event46.5 µg/m³ After18 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.335 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.289 ppm Event0.335 ppm After0.348 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide12.4 ppb
About the same as surrounding days
Before11.7 ppb Event12.4 ppb After16.7 ppb
Sulfur dioxide4.29 ppb
32% higher than surrounding days
Before3.23 ppb Event4.29 ppb After3.77 ppb
Ozone0.057 ppm
20% higher than surrounding days
Before0.048 ppm Event0.057 ppm After0.043 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity73.1 %
About the same as surrounding days
Pressure1028 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature81.8 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Wind5.27 kt
8% higher than surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
2 retained sources
Official record
2006 U.S.-Canada Air Quality Agreement Progress Report
U.S. EPA and Environment Canada
The binational progress report preserves an eastern U.S. PM2.5 map for July 11, 2006 that places Philadelphia inside a broader regional pollution episode.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The mapped condition does not identify the mixture or source mechanism.
Official record
A Guide to Mid-Atlantic Regional Air Quality
Mid-Atlantic Regional Air Management Association
The regional assessment says spatially coherent eastern summer PM2.5 peaks consist primarily of secondary sulfate formed downwind of sulfur-dioxide sources and are often intensified by stationary high pressure, weak mixing, and stagnation.
What it supports
Context for the event; this item does not establish the attributed cause by itself.
Limit
The assessment characterizes the recurring Mid-Atlantic episode mechanism rather than measuring Philadelphia's July 11 composition directly.
What remains uncertain
The exact-date source establishes regional coherence, while the cause mechanism comes from a regional assessment rather than day-specific Philadelphia speciation.
Status and provenance
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.