← Air events

Regional secondary PM Possible

2006-07-11 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD regional secondary-particle pollution episode

July 11, 2006

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 63 µg/m³ near Philadelphia across 1 covered metro home to 6.3 million people.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 2.3 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 14 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Regional secondary PM”

An official exact-date map places Philadelphia within a broad eastern PM2.5 episode, and the Mid-Atlantic planning assessment says the region's spatially coherent summer peaks are primarily secondary sulfate under slow-moving high pressure and stagnation. This supports regional secondary PM at possible confidence.

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Source not directly documented

    The catalog has a grouping hypothesis, but no retained source directly establishes the proposed cause.

    Open question
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The transport path has not been reconstructed

    The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.

    Research gap
  3. 3

    Local response

    63 µg/m³ near Philadelphia

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.9 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Regional secondary PM” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD

Monitor comparison window 2006-07-08 to 2006-07-14 · PM2.5 target: COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES (CHS)

6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 37.7 µg/m³

85% above nearby days

Air movement 5.27 kt

8% higher than surrounding days

PM10 46.5 µg/m³

127% higher than surrounding days

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 37.7 µg/m³

85% higher than surrounding days

Before17.3 µg/m³ Event37.7 µg/m³ After20.4 µg/m³
14 monitors · 24 HOUR
PM10 46.5 µg/m³

127% higher than surrounding days

Before20.5 µg/m³ Event46.5 µg/m³ After18 µg/m³
4 monitors · 24-HR BLK AVG
Carbon monoxide 0.335 ppm

About the same as surrounding days

Before0.289 ppm Event0.335 ppm After0.348 ppm
10 monitors · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 12.4 ppb

About the same as surrounding days

Before11.7 ppb Event12.4 ppb After16.7 ppb
7 monitors · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 4.29 ppb

32% higher than surrounding days

Before3.23 ppb Event4.29 ppb After3.77 ppb
14 monitors · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.057 ppm

20% higher than surrounding days

Before0.048 ppm Event0.057 ppm After0.043 ppm
15 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity 73.1 %

About the same as surrounding days

Pressure 1028 Millibars

About the same as surrounding days

Temperature 81.8 °F

About the same as surrounding days

Wind 5.27 kt

8% higher than surrounding days

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Views from the selected metro

Camera views near

Browse the camera map →

Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 63 µg/m³ 2.9 Jul 11, 2006 #14 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

2 retained sources

Official record

2006 U.S.-Canada Air Quality Agreement Progress Report

U.S. EPA and Environment Canada

The binational progress report preserves an eastern U.S. PM2.5 map for July 11, 2006 that places Philadelphia inside a broader regional pollution episode.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

The mapped condition does not identify the mixture or source mechanism.

Official record

A Guide to Mid-Atlantic Regional Air Quality

Mid-Atlantic Regional Air Management Association

The regional assessment says spatially coherent eastern summer PM2.5 peaks consist primarily of secondary sulfate formed downwind of sulfur-dioxide sources and are often intensified by stationary high pressure, weak mixing, and stagnation.

What it supports

Context for the event; this item does not establish the attributed cause by itself.

Limit

The assessment characterizes the recurring Mid-Atlantic episode mechanism rather than measuring Philadelphia's July 11 composition directly.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.