Daily PM2.5 peaked at 45.9 µg/m³ near Winston across
1 covered metro home to 705,187 people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 1.6 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 1.1 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Regional secondary PM”
Winston-Salem, NC's 3-monitor PM2.5 episode reached 44 µg/m³, 2.023 times the adjacent-window level, during 58% light-wind hours, 15 haze hours, a measured 2.8°C low-level inversion. Exact-date regional speciation sites measured 62.3% to 81.6% of reconstructed mass as ammonium sulfate plus ammonium nitrate. Together these measurements support regional secondary PM at possible confidence; the regional sites did not directly sample the city and no particular source region is assigned.
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
EPA records show median daily PM2.5 of 44 micrograms per cubic meter across 3 monitors, 2.023 times the adjacent-window level. Co-pollutants at least 10% above the adjacent-window comparison were pm10 (1.802x), nitrogen dioxide (1.116x). Other measured comparisons were carbon monoxide (1.075x), sulfur dioxide (0.917x).
National Weather Service surface observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Aug 28, 2003hypothesis
WINSTON-SALEM/SMITH_(ASOS) recorded calm conditions during 29% of event hours and wind at or below three knots during 58%. Observations included 15 haze hours, 7 mist hours, minimum visibility 1.5 miles.
U.S. EPA AirData Chemical Speciation · Aug 28, 2003hypothesis
On the exact event date, 3 EPA speciation sites within 250 km measured a majority of reconstructed PM2.5 mass as ammonium sulfate plus ammonium nitrate: Linville Falls (154.4 km; 75.9%; reconstructed mass 21.4 µg/m³); Natural Bridge Ranger Station (180 km; 62.3%; reconstructed mass 16.8 µg/m³); Frying Pan Mountain (245.6 km; 81.6%; reconstructed mass 34.8 µg/m³).
Inference, not direct attribution
nearby_exact_date_secondary_inorganic_regional_context.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
nearby_exact_date_secondary_inorganic_regional_context.v1. This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.
Inferred
2
Air-mass movement
The transport path has not been reconstructed
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
45.9 µg/m³ near Winston
EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.1 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Regional secondary PM” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
WINSTON-SALEM/SMITH_(ASOS), 2.5 km from the PM2.5 target
Wind3 kt median
7 kt maximum · 7 of 24 observed hours calm
Visibility1.5 mi minimum
13 observed hours at or below 3 miles
Temperature82°F median
75°F to 90°F
Humidity77% median
94% maximum
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
3 retained sources
Official record
Winston-Salem, NC surface conditions, 2003-08-28
National Weather Service surface observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet
WINSTON-SALEM/SMITH_(ASOS) recorded calm conditions during 29% of event hours and wind at or below three knots during 58%. Observations included 15 haze hours, 7 mist hours, minimum visibility 1.5 miles.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
A single surface station documents weak ventilation and obscuration but not the full vertical profile or particle source mix.
On the exact event date, 3 EPA speciation sites within 250 km measured a majority of reconstructed PM2.5 mass as ammonium sulfate plus ammonium nitrate: Linville Falls (154.4 km; 75.9%; reconstructed mass 21.4 µg/m³); Natural Bridge Ranger Station (180 km; 62.3%; reconstructed mass 16.8 µg/m³); Frying Pan Mountain (245.6 km; 81.6%; reconstructed mass 34.8 µg/m³).
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The usable composition sites were 154.4 km and 180 km and 245.6 km from the affected-place PM2.5 target and did not directly measure the city air.
EPA records show median daily PM2.5 of 44 micrograms per cubic meter across 3 monitors, 2.023 times the adjacent-window level. Co-pollutants at least 10% above the adjacent-window comparison were pm10 (1.802x), nitrogen dioxide (1.116x). Other measured comparisons were carbon monoxide (1.075x), sulfur dioxide (0.917x).
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The broad multi-pollutant response does not apportion traffic, heating, industry, wood combustion, or secondary aerosol.
What remains uncertain
A single surface station documents weak ventilation and obscuration but not the full vertical profile or particle source mix.
Chemical composition identifies an aerosol mechanism, not a particular emitting facility or source region.
Same-date regional composition and distance do not by themselves prove that every site sampled one shared air mass.
The 50% majority is an IAQng catalog convention and not an EPA source-attribution threshold.
The broad multi-pollutant response does not apportion traffic, heating, industry, wood combustion, or secondary aerosol.
The same pattern also occurred in benchmark temperature-inversion and regional-secondary-PM episodes.
The strict joint-fingerprint rule achieved 22.2% precision for stagnant mixed pollution on the 56-case labeled benchmark.
The usable composition sites were 154.4 km and 180 km and 245.6 km from the affected-place PM2.5 target and did not directly measure the city air.
Status and provenance
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.