← Air events

Regional secondary PM Possible

2003-08-19 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC regional secondary-particle pollution episode

August 19, 2003

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 44.5 µg/m³ near Augusta across 1 covered metro home to 636,760 people.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Regional secondary PM”

A peer-reviewed exact-window analysis identifies an anthropogenic extreme aerosol event over the Southeast on the same dates as the measured metro episode. The region-level match supports a possible regional-secondary-PM estimate but not a city-specific source allocation.

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

Inference, not direct attribution

exact_window_regional_secondary_aerosol_study_possible.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Regional secondary PM

    The peer-reviewed study identifies August 17-19, 2003 as a regional-scale extreme aerosol event centered in the Southeast, selected to exclude biomass-burning and windblown-dust cases and described as dominated by anthropogenic emissions. EPA…

    View supporting source ↗
    Documented
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The 72-hour air-mass history is reconstructed

    NOAA HYSPLIT modeled 12 backward paths across multiple arrival times and heights. They show where the air traveled, not which source polluted it.

    Explore the modeled paths ↓
    Modeled
  3. 3

    Local response

    44.5 µg/m³ near Augusta

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.0 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Regional secondary PM” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC

Monitor comparison window 2003-08-16 to 2003-08-22 · PM2.5 target: Medical College of Georgia

4 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 42.2 µg/m³

204% above nearby days

PM10 60 µg/m³

No adjacent-day comparison

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 42.2 µg/m³

204% higher than surrounding days

Before13.9 µg/m³ Event42.2 µg/m³ After7.60 µg/m³
3 monitors · 24 HOUR
PM10 60 µg/m³

No adjacent-day comparison

Before Event60 µg/m³ After
1 monitor · 24 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 4.42 ppb

89% higher than surrounding days

Before2.46 ppb Event4.42 ppb After1.92 ppb
1 monitor · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.025 ppm

About the same as surrounding days

Before0.023 ppm Event0.025 ppm After0.026 ppm
3 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Air-mass reconstruction

Where the air had been

NOAA HYSPLIT traces the air arriving at each metro backward for 72 hours. Multiple arrival times and heights show whether the broad path is stable—or sensitive to assumptions about when and where the polluted layer arrived.

Transport context · not source attribution

Air arriving near Augusta-Richmond County

Peak-date arrivals · 2003-08-19

Broad history Mostly southwest of the metro
72-hour reach 450–650 km
Sensitivity runs 12 modeled paths
Arrival metro
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m

Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions. A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 44.5 µg/m³ 2.0 Aug 19, 2003 #13 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

1 retained source

Scientific research

Extreme Aerosol Events Over Eastern North America: 1. Characterizing and Simulating Historical Events

Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

The peer-reviewed study identifies August 17-19, 2003 as a regional-scale extreme aerosol event centered in the Southeast, selected to exclude biomass-burning and windblown-dust cases and described as dominated by anthropogenic emissions. EPA near-surface PM2.5 observations were used to evaluate the event.

What it supports

A retained source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.

Limit

The study evaluates the Southeast event as a region and does not apportion the complete PM2.5 mass at the selected metro monitor.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.