← Air events

Regional secondary PM Possible

2003-03-12 Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA regional secondary-particle pollution episode

March 12, 2003

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 56.7 µg/m³ near Harrisburg across 1 covered metro home to 615,361 people.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 2.1 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 1.3 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Regional secondary PM”

The exact event is a coherent, fine-particle-dominant multi-monitor spike under exceptionally stagnant and hazy conditions. Pennsylvania's same-place, same-year composition profile is dominated by sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium. Together these support a regional secondary-aerosol episode with accumulated urban combustion tracers, but no exact-day composition sample was available.

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

U.S. EPA Air Quality System; IAQng event-autopsy calculation v1 hypothesis

Harrisburg pollution fingerprint, March 12, 2003

EPA observations show median PM2.5 of 51.85 µg/m³ across three monitors, versus 9.7 before and 18.95 after. PM10 reached 66 µg/m³, making the event strongly fine-particle dominant, while carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide each rose to nearly three times their preceding values and sulfur dioxide remained roughly flat.

NOAA/NWS surface observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Mar 12, 2003 hypothesis

Harrisburg surface observations reporting calm air and haze

The airport 3.3 km from the target PM2.5 monitor recorded calm wind during 17 hours, wind at or below 3 knots during 20 hours, haze during 7 hours, and visibility at or below 3 miles during 15 hours.

Inference, not direct attribution

multi_monitor_fingerprint_with_local_seasonal_profile_possible.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Pattern-based explanation

    multi_monitor_fingerprint_with_local_seasonal_profile_possible.v1. This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.

    Inferred
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The 72-hour air-mass history is reconstructed

    NOAA HYSPLIT modeled 12 backward paths across multiple arrival times and heights. They show where the air traveled, not which source polluted it.

    Explore the modeled paths ↓
    Modeled
  3. 3

    Local response

    56.7 µg/m³ near Harrisburg

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.6 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Regional secondary PM” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA

Monitor comparison window 2003-03-09 to 2003-03-15 · PM2.5 target: Harrisburg

5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 51.9 µg/m³

174% above nearby days

PM10 66 µg/m³

230% higher than surrounding days

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 51.9 µg/m³

174% higher than surrounding days

Before9.70 µg/m³ Event51.9 µg/m³ After18.9 µg/m³
3 monitors · 24 HOUR
PM10 66 µg/m³

230% higher than surrounding days

Before16 µg/m³ Event66 µg/m³ After20 µg/m³
1 monitor · 24-HR BLK AVG
Carbon monoxide 1.14 ppm

56% higher than surrounding days

Before0.396 ppm Event1.14 ppm After0.733 ppm
1 monitor · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 29.3 ppb

85% higher than surrounding days

Before10.3 ppb Event29.3 ppb After15.8 ppb
2 monitors · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 7.43 ppb

10% lower than surrounding days

Before8.54 ppb Event7.43 ppb After8.27 ppb
2 monitors · 1 HOUR

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Air-mass reconstruction

Where the air had been

NOAA HYSPLIT traces the air arriving at each metro backward for 72 hours. Multiple arrival times and heights show whether the broad path is stable—or sensitive to assumptions about when and where the polluted layer arrived.

Transport context · not source attribution

Air arriving near Harrisburg-Carlisle

Peak-date arrivals · 2003-03-12

Broad history Mostly west of the metro
72-hour reach 900–3,700 km
Sensitivity runs 12 modeled paths
Arrival metro
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m

Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions. A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Views from the selected metro

Camera views near

Browse the camera map →

Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 56.7 µg/m³ 2.6 Mar 12, 2003 #17 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

3 retained sources

Official record

Pennsylvania Air Quality Monitoring Annual Report, 2003

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

Pennsylvania DEP's 2003 Harrisburg PM2.5 composition chart assigns 30% of annual mass to sulfate, 18% to nitrate, and 15% to ammonium, with another 23% organic carbon and 4% elemental carbon. The same-place, same-year profile is dominated by secondary inorganic aerosol.

What it supports

Context for the event; this item does not establish the attributed cause by itself.

Limit

The chart is an annual Harrisburg profile, not an exact-date source-apportionment sample.

Official record

Harrisburg surface observations reporting calm air and haze

NOAA/NWS surface observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet

The airport 3.3 km from the target PM2.5 monitor recorded calm wind during 17 hours, wind at or below 3 knots during 20 hours, haze during 7 hours, and visibility at or below 3 miles during 15 hours.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

The airport and pollution monitors are nearby but not co-located.

Official record

Harrisburg pollution fingerprint, March 12, 2003

U.S. EPA Air Quality System; IAQng event-autopsy calculation v1

EPA observations show median PM2.5 of 51.85 µg/m³ across three monitors, versus 9.7 before and 18.95 after. PM10 reached 66 µg/m³, making the event strongly fine-particle dominant, while carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide each rose to nearly three times their preceding values and sulfur dioxide remained roughly flat.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

Pollutants were not necessarily measured at the same sites, and the fingerprint is descriptive rather than formal source apportionment.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.