2002-06-25 Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD and Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV regional secondary-particle pollution episode
June 25, 2002
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 59.6 µg/m³ near Baltimore across
2 covered metros home to 9.3 million people.
1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 2.2 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 20 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Regional secondary PM”
A published exact-event analysis at the Baltimore Supersite attributes the June 24-25 episode primarily to ammonium sulfate and organic matter.
Officially verifiedA directly applicable government determination or qualified scientific attribution product identifies this cause.
Aerosol Science and Technology · Aug 1, 2006corroborates
The exact episode analysis reports PM2.5 rising to 59 micrograms per cubic meter on June 25 and estimates ammonium sulfate plus organic matter comprised 86-98 percent of mass.
Sequence: Baltimore (Jun 25) → Washington (Jun 25)
Evidence path
From source to city
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
The exact episode analysis reports PM2.5 rising to 59 micrograms per cubic meter on June 25 and estimates ammonium sulfate plus organic matter comprised 86-98 percent of mass.
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
59.6 µg/m³ near Baltimore
EPA monitors recorded the event across 2 metros.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.7 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Regional secondary PM” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD
Monitor comparison window 2002-06-22 to 2002-06-28 · PM2.5 target: Oldtown
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse54.7 µg/m³
232% above nearby days
PM1050 µg/m³
No adjacent-day comparison
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.554.7 µg/m³
232% higher than surrounding days
Before16.5 µg/m³ Event54.7 µg/m³ After16.1 µg/m³
PM1050 µg/m³
No adjacent-day comparison
Before— Event50 µg/m³ After—
Carbon monoxide0.465 ppm
34% higher than surrounding days
Before0.356 ppm Event0.465 ppm After0.276 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide18.9 ppb
22% higher than surrounding days
Before15.5 ppb Event18.9 ppb After9.63 ppb
Sulfur dioxide8.88 ppb
60% higher than surrounding days
Before2.42 ppb Event8.88 ppb After5.54 ppb
Ozone0.075 ppm
50% higher than surrounding days
Before0.061 ppm Event0.075 ppm After0.043 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity68.6 %
About the same as surrounding days
Pressure1019 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature84.3 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV
Monitor comparison window 2002-06-22 to 2002-06-28 · PM2.5 target: PG Equestrian Center
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse52.8 µg/m³
232% above nearby days
PM1047 µg/m³
No adjacent-day comparison
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.552.8 µg/m³
232% higher than surrounding days
Before15.9 µg/m³ Event52.8 µg/m³ After14.4 µg/m³
PM1047 µg/m³
No adjacent-day comparison
Before— Event47 µg/m³ After—
Carbon monoxide0.581 ppm
48% higher than surrounding days
Before0.373 ppm Event0.581 ppm After0.392 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide21.6 ppb
66% higher than surrounding days
Before12.3 ppb Event21.6 ppb After13 ppb
Sulfur dioxide10.4 ppb
229% higher than surrounding days
Before3.17 ppb Event10.4 ppb After2.46 ppb
Ozone0.064 ppm
54% higher than surrounding days
Before0.055 ppm Event0.064 ppm After0.035 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity66.3 %
About the same as surrounding days
Pressure1011 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature84.5 °F
7% higher than surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
1 retained source
Scientific research
Characteristics of PM2.5 Episodes at the Baltimore Supersite
Aerosol Science and Technology
The exact episode analysis reports PM2.5 rising to 59 micrograms per cubic meter on June 25 and estimates ammonium sulfate plus organic matter comprised 86-98 percent of mass.
What it supports
A retained source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.
Limit
Measurements are centered on Baltimore; Washington applicability comes from the documented shared regional episode.
What remains uncertain
This identifies the dominant aerosol mechanism, not one emitting facility.
Status and provenance
Officially verifiedA directly applicable government determination or qualified scientific attribution product identifies this cause.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.