← Air events

Regional secondary PM Possible

2000-10-30 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL regional secondary-particle pollution episode

October 30, 2000

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 42 µg/m³ near Miami across 1 covered metro home to 6.5 million people.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 1.5 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 9.8 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Regional secondary PM”

EPA's exact-date CSN sample for Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL shows ammonium sulfate plus ammonium nitrate made up 80.1% of reconstructed PM2.5 mass. This supports regional secondary-particle pollution as a possible mechanism for this place only.

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

Inference, not direct attribution

Same-day particle composition: EPA speciation observations on the peak date show a majority secondary-inorganic aerosol signature. This supports a regional secondary-particle mechanism, not a single emitting source.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Pattern-based explanation

    Same-day particle composition. EPA speciation observations on the peak date show a majority secondary-inorganic aerosol signature. This supports a regional secondary-particle mechanism, not a single emitting source.

    Inferred
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The transport path has not been reconstructed

    The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.

    Research gap
  3. 3

    Local response

    42 µg/m³ near Miami

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 1.9 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Regional secondary PM” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL

Monitor comparison window 2000-10-27 to 2000-11-02 · PM2.5 target: Miami Fire Station

5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 35.6 µg/m³

246% above nearby days

Air movement 4 kt median wind

6 calm hours observed

What observers saw 4 mi minimum visibility

Haze reported during 7 hours

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 35.6 µg/m³

246% higher than surrounding days

Before9.10 µg/m³ Event35.6 µg/m³ After10.3 µg/m³
7 monitors · 24 HOUR
Carbon monoxide 0.996 ppm

20% higher than surrounding days

Before0.833 ppm Event0.996 ppm After0.817 ppm
9 monitors · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 18.4 ppb

10% higher than surrounding days

Before16.7 ppb Event18.4 ppb After14.4 ppb
5 monitors · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 1.71 ppb

About the same as surrounding days

Before1.67 ppb Event1.71 ppb After1.33 ppb
3 monitors · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.038 ppm

13% higher than surrounding days

Before0.031 ppm Event0.038 ppm After0.034 ppm
9 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

MIAMI INTL AIRPORT, 10.2 km from the PM2.5 target
Wind 4 kt median

10 kt maximum · 6 of 24 observed hours calm

Visibility 4 mi minimum

0 observed hours at or below 3 miles

Temperature 76°F median

71°F to 83°F

Humidity 69% median

87% maximum

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL 42 µg/m³ 1.9 Oct 30, 2000 #19 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

1 retained source

Official record

Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL PM2.5 composition on 2000-10-30

U.S. EPA AirData Chemical Speciation Network

EPA's exact-date CSN sample reconstructed 24.9 µg/m³ of PM2.5. Ammonium sulfate and ammonium nitrate contributed 20 µg/m³, or 80.1% of reconstructed mass; every usable site exceeded 50%.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

Chemical composition identifies the measured aerosol mechanism, not a particular emitting facility or source region.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.