1999-07-17 to 1999-07-18 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY, Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH, and 5 other metros regional secondary-particle pollution episode
July 17, 1999 to July 18, 1999
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 54.3 µg/m³ near Boston across
7 covered metros home to 11 million people.
4 metros placed a top-ten day in their record.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 2.3 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 25 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Regional secondary PM”
An exact-window scientific analysis identifies a coherent Northeast sulfate haze episode caused by long-range transport.
LikelyApplicable reporting or a supported inference makes this the best current causal explanation.
The episode analysis calls July 16-17 a major Northeast PM2.5 event and reports modeling that identified sulfate transported over long distances from the eastern U.S. and southeastern Canada as the most likely haze component.
Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management corroborates
The regional haze assessment includes a map of average 24-hour total PM2.5 concentrations across the Northeast on 17 July 1999, corroborating that this was a regionally documented fine-particle episode; it does not assign a source to this event.
Sequence: Boston (Jul 17) → Albany (Jul 17) → Worcester (Jul 17) → Providence (Jul 17) → Springfield (Jul 17) → New Haven (Jul 17) → Hartford (Jul 17)
Evidence path
From source to city
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
The episode analysis calls July 16-17 a major Northeast PM2.5 event and reports modeling that identified sulfate transported over long distances from the eastern U.S. and southeastern Canada as the most likely haze component.
The regional haze assessment includes a map of average 24-hour total PM2.5 concentrations across the Northeast on 17 July 1999, corroborating that this was a regionally documented fine-particle episode; it does not assign a source to this event.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Regional secondary PM” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY
Monitor comparison window 1999-07-14 to 1999-07-21 · PM2.5 target: LOUDONVILLE
4 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse49.4 µg/m³
313% above nearby days
Air movement2.85 kt
About the same as surrounding days
Carbon monoxide0.398 ppm
5% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.549.4 µg/m³
313% higher than surrounding days
Before11.9 µg/m³ Event49.4 µg/m³ After7.90 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.398 ppm
5% higher than surrounding days
Before0.405 ppm Event0.398 ppm After0.330 ppm
Sulfur dioxide1.96 ppb
28% lower than surrounding days
Before3.72 ppb Event1.96 ppb After1.45 ppb
Ozone0.057 ppm
16% higher than surrounding days
Before0.055 ppm Event0.057 ppm After0.033 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity66.4 %
About the same as surrounding days
Pressure1005 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature81.3 °F
14% higher than surrounding days
Wind2.85 kt
About the same as surrounding days
Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH
Monitor comparison window 1999-07-14 to 1999-07-21
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse49.1 µg/m³
344% above nearby days
PM1066.5 µg/m³
9% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.549.1 µg/m³
344% higher than surrounding days
Before10.9 µg/m³ Event49.1 µg/m³ After11.1 µg/m³
PM1066.5 µg/m³
9% higher than surrounding days
Before55 µg/m³ Event66.5 µg/m³ After—
Carbon monoxide0.742 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.773 ppm Event0.742 ppm After0.604 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide16.1 ppb
11% lower than surrounding days
Before22 ppb Event16.1 ppb After15.4 ppb
Sulfur dioxide2.85 ppb
6% lower than surrounding days
Before4.54 ppb Event2.85 ppb After2.83 ppb
Ozone0.061 ppm
36% higher than surrounding days
Before0.052 ppm Event0.061 ppm After0.025 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity47.8 %
10% lower than surrounding days
Pressure1014 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature84 °F
16% higher than surrounding days
Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT
Monitor comparison window 1999-07-14 to 1999-07-21 · PM2.5 target: McAuliffe Park
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse42.8 µg/m³
218% above nearby days
PM1048 µg/m³
No adjacent-day comparison
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.542.8 µg/m³
218% higher than surrounding days
Before13.4 µg/m³ Event42.8 µg/m³ After8 µg/m³
PM1048 µg/m³
No adjacent-day comparison
Before— Event48 µg/m³ After—
Carbon monoxide0.814 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.985 ppm Event0.814 ppm After0.867 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide12.3 ppb
14% lower than surrounding days
Before16.4 ppb Event12.3 ppb After10.8 ppb
Sulfur dioxide6.72 ppb
56% higher than surrounding days
Before4.43 ppb Event6.72 ppb After2.87 ppb
Ozone0.075 ppm
27% higher than surrounding days
Before0.076 ppm Event0.075 ppm After0.035 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity65.7 °F
11% higher than surrounding days
Pressure998 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature84.9 °F
13% higher than surrounding days
New Haven-Milford, CT
Monitor comparison window 1999-07-14 to 1999-07-21 · PM2.5 target: Meadow and Bank Streets
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse39.5 µg/m³
250% above nearby days
PM1044 µg/m³
31% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.539.5 µg/m³
250% higher than surrounding days
Before11.3 µg/m³ Event39.5 µg/m³ After8.70 µg/m³
PM1044 µg/m³
31% higher than surrounding days
Before40 µg/m³ Event44 µg/m³ After23.5 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.665 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.813 ppm Event0.665 ppm After0.500 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide26.3 ppb
About the same as surrounding days
Before31.4 ppb Event26.3 ppb After21.6 ppb
Sulfur dioxide6.15 ppb
30% higher than surrounding days
Before4.85 ppb Event6.15 ppb After3.67 ppb
Ozone0.073 ppm
36% higher than surrounding days
Before0.064 ppm Event0.073 ppm After0.043 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Pressure1016 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature83.6 °F
10% higher than surrounding days
Providence-Warwick, RI-MA
Monitor comparison window 1999-07-14 to 1999-07-21
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse40.5 µg/m³
72% above nearby days
PM1057.5 µg/m³
No adjacent-day comparison
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.540.5 µg/m³
72% higher than surrounding days
Before15.2 µg/m³ Event40.5 µg/m³ After11 µg/m³
PM1057.5 µg/m³
No adjacent-day comparison
Before— Event57.5 µg/m³ After—
Carbon monoxide0.251 ppm
30% lower than surrounding days
Before0.719 ppm Event0.251 ppm After0.369 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide11.9 ppb
11% lower than surrounding days
Before13.1 ppb Event11.9 ppb After15.6 ppb
Sulfur dioxide2.08 ppb
26% lower than surrounding days
Before2 ppb Event2.08 ppb After3.50 ppb
Ozone0.069 ppm
44% higher than surrounding days
Before0.060 ppm Event0.069 ppm After0.036 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity63.6 %
7% lower than surrounding days
Pressure1015 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature80.4 °F
10% higher than surrounding days
Springfield, MA
Monitor comparison window 1999-07-14 to 1999-07-21 · PM2.5 target: LIBERTY ST PARKING LOT
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse47.4 µg/m³
249% above nearby days
PM1062.5 µg/m³
No adjacent-day comparison
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.547.4 µg/m³
249% higher than surrounding days
Before13.6 µg/m³ Event47.4 µg/m³ After7.65 µg/m³
PM1062.5 µg/m³
No adjacent-day comparison
Before— Event62.5 µg/m³ After—
Carbon monoxide0.580 ppm
10% lower than surrounding days
Before0.779 ppm Event0.580 ppm After0.548 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide14.2 ppb
About the same as surrounding days
Before17.9 ppb Event14.2 ppb After10.9 ppb
Sulfur dioxide4.89 ppb
40% higher than surrounding days
Before2.61 ppb Event4.89 ppb After3.05 ppb
Ozone0.054 ppm
13% higher than surrounding days
Before0.056 ppm Event0.054 ppm After0.026 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity85.4 %
About the same as surrounding days
Pressure1008 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature83.4 °F
13% higher than surrounding days
Worcester, MA-CT
Monitor comparison window 1999-07-14 to 1999-07-21
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse47.3 µg/m³
294% above nearby days
PM1058 µg/m³
No adjacent-day comparison
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.547.3 µg/m³
294% higher than surrounding days
Before12 µg/m³ Event47.3 µg/m³ After6.20 µg/m³
PM1058 µg/m³
No adjacent-day comparison
Before— Event58 µg/m³ After—
Carbon monoxide0.885 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before1.09 ppm Event0.885 ppm After0.421 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide12.2 ppb
22% lower than surrounding days
Before23 ppb Event12.2 ppb After12.8 ppb
Sulfur dioxide5.26 ppb
17% higher than surrounding days
Before4.58 ppb Event5.26 ppb After2.13 ppb
Ozone0.079 ppm
30% higher than surrounding days
Before0.076 ppm Event0.079 ppm After0.037 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Temperature78.6 °F
11% higher than surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Air-mass reconstruction
Where the air had been
NOAA HYSPLIT traces the air arriving at each metro backward for 72 hours. Multiple
arrival times and heights show whether the broad path is stable—or sensitive to
assumptions about when and where the polluted layer arrived.
Transport context · not source attribution
Air arriving near Albany-Schenectady-Troy
Peak-date arrivals · 1999-07-17
Broad historyMostly southwest of the metro
72-hour reach850–1,800 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near Boston-Cambridge-Newton
Peak-date arrivals · 1999-07-17
Broad historyMostly west of the metro
72-hour reach800–2,350 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford
Peak-date arrivals · 1999-07-17
Broad historyMostly west of the metro
72-hour reach550–1,850 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near New Haven-Milford
Peak-date arrivals · 1999-07-17
Broad historyMostly west of the metro
72-hour reach450–1,600 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near Providence-Warwick
Peak-date arrivals · 1999-07-17
Broad historyMostly west of the metro
72-hour reach500–2,100 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near Springfield
Peak-date arrivals · 1999-07-17
Broad historyMostly west of the metro
72-hour reach650–1,950 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near Worcester
Peak-date arrivals · 1999-07-17
Broad historyMostly west of the metro
72-hour reach700–2,150 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
1 retained source
Scientific research
Satellite Haze Detection on July 16-18, 1999
CAPITA / Washington University
The episode analysis calls July 16-17 a major Northeast PM2.5 event and reports modeling that identified sulfate transported over long distances from the eastern U.S. and southeastern Canada as the most likely haze component.
What it supports
A retained source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.
Limit
This is an early scientific episode presentation preserved as a transcript rather than a regulator's formal event determination.
What remains uncertain
The broad regional category is supported; no single facility or source region should be named beyond the published eastern U.S./southeastern Canada transport description.
Status and provenance
LikelyApplicable reporting or a supported inference makes this the best current causal explanation.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.