1999-07-15 to 1999-07-18 Akron, OH, Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY, and 8 other metros regional secondary-particle pollution episode
July 15, 1999 to July 18, 1999
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 72.8 µg/m³ near Pittsburgh across
10 covered metros home to 14 million people.
3 metros placed a top-ten day in their record.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 2.4 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 33 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Regional secondary PM”
Manual research connected 3 source events to one regional secondary-particle pollution episode using the deterministic grouping rule.
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association · Aug 1, 2003corroborates
The study identifies July 15-19, 1999 as the strongest PM2.5/haze episode in its summer record. Ammoniated sulfate was the primary cause of the particle-mass buildup, while persistent high pressure, westerly transport, and recirculation slowed pollutant removal.
Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management corroborates
The regional haze assessment documents a Northeast-wide PM2.5 pattern on 17 July 1999, supporting grouping with the contemporaneous northeastern event; it does not establish the source or specifically attribute conditions in Scranton or Syracuse.
Environmental Fluid Mechanics · Jan 1, 2001hypothesis
The study treats July 15-19 as an eastern U.S. ozone and PM2.5 episode under persistent high pressure, high temperatures, and westerly flow favorable for transporting pollutants from the Midwest toward the Northeast.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
The study identifies July 15-19, 1999 as the strongest PM2.5/haze episode in its summer record. Ammoniated sulfate was the primary cause of the particle-mass buildup, while persistent high pressure, westerly transport, and recirculation slowed…
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Regional secondary PM” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Akron, OH
Monitor comparison window 1999-07-13 to 1999-07-20 · PM2.5 target: East HS
5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse48 µg/m³
46% above nearby days
PM1064.5 µg/m³
45% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.548 µg/m³
46% higher than surrounding days
Before33 µg/m³ Event48 µg/m³ After25.1 µg/m³
PM1064.5 µg/m³
45% higher than surrounding days
Before45.5 µg/m³ Event64.5 µg/m³ After33.5 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.753 ppm
9% higher than surrounding days
Before0.756 ppm Event0.753 ppm After0.635 ppm
Sulfur dioxide12.6 ppb
14% higher than surrounding days
Before11.9 ppb Event12.6 ppb After5.78 ppb
Ozone0.056 ppm
7% higher than surrounding days
Before0.056 ppm Event0.056 ppm After0.046 ppm
Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY
Monitor comparison window 1999-07-13 to 1999-07-20 · PM2.5 target: BUFFALO
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse41.9 µg/m³
26% above nearby days
Air movement7.31 kt
72% higher than surrounding days
PM1052 µg/m³
No adjacent-day comparison
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.541.9 µg/m³
26% higher than surrounding days
Before24.8 µg/m³ Event41.9 µg/m³ After—
PM1052 µg/m³
No adjacent-day comparison
Before— Event52 µg/m³ After—
Carbon monoxide0.458 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.433 ppm Event0.458 ppm After0.463 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide18.9 ppb
About the same as surrounding days
Before19.8 ppb Event18.9 ppb After18.4 ppb
Sulfur dioxide13.1 ppb
68% higher than surrounding days
Before8.25 ppb Event13.1 ppb After4.54 ppb
Ozone0.070 ppm
22% higher than surrounding days
Before0.069 ppm Event0.070 ppm After0.026 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity66 %
About the same as surrounding days
Pressure997 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature79.4 °F
5% higher than surrounding days
Wind7.31 kt
72% higher than surrounding days
Pittsburgh, PA
Monitor comparison window 1999-07-13 to 1999-07-20
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse51.5 µg/m³
85% above nearby days
PM1086 µg/m³
85% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.551.5 µg/m³
85% higher than surrounding days
Before18.3 µg/m³ Event51.5 µg/m³ After25.8 µg/m³
PM1086 µg/m³
85% higher than surrounding days
Before23 µg/m³ Event86 µg/m³ After42.5 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.587 ppm
90% higher than surrounding days
Before0.323 ppm Event0.587 ppm After0.227 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide22.9 ppb
27% higher than surrounding days
Before17.9 ppb Event22.9 ppb After15.3 ppb
Sulfur dioxide13 ppb
19% higher than surrounding days
Before7.68 ppb Event13 ppb After11.1 ppb
Ozone0.065 ppm
14% higher than surrounding days
Before0.044 ppm Event0.065 ppm After0.053 ppm
Scranton--Wilkes-Barre--Hazleton, PA
Monitor comparison window 1999-07-14 to 1999-07-21 · PM2.5 target: Scranton
5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse52.4 µg/m³
119% above nearby days
Carbon monoxide0.208 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.552.4 µg/m³
119% higher than surrounding days
Before23.9 µg/m³ Event52.4 µg/m³ After12 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.208 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.177 ppm Event0.208 ppm After0.313 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide13.6 ppb
17% lower than surrounding days
Before20.4 ppb Event13.6 ppb After13.8 ppb
Sulfur dioxide8.49 ppb
12% higher than surrounding days
Before9.77 ppb Event8.49 ppb After6.33 ppb
Ozone0.062 ppm
20% higher than surrounding days
Before0.056 ppm Event0.062 ppm After0.043 ppm
Syracuse, NY
Monitor comparison window 1999-07-14 to 1999-07-21 · PM2.5 target: EAST SYRACUSE
4 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse41.4 µg/m³
174% above nearby days
Air movement4.50 kt
About the same as surrounding days
Carbon monoxide0.365 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.541.4 µg/m³
174% higher than surrounding days
Before15.1 µg/m³ Event41.4 µg/m³ After6.60 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.365 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.338 ppm Event0.365 ppm After0.400 ppm
Sulfur dioxide1.67 ppb
About the same as surrounding days
Before2.78 ppb Event1.67 ppb After0.731 ppb
Ozone0.048 ppm
About the same as surrounding days
Before0.061 ppm Event0.048 ppm After0.025 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity76.2 %
About the same as surrounding days
Pressure982 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature75.9 °F
5% higher than surrounding days
Wind4.50 kt
About the same as surrounding days
Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN
Monitor comparison window 1999-07-12 to 1999-07-19 · PM2.5 target: VERITY
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse48.6 µg/m³
72% above nearby days
PM1058 µg/m³
98% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.548.6 µg/m³
72% higher than surrounding days
Before17.8 µg/m³ Event48.6 µg/m³ After30.9 µg/m³
PM1058 µg/m³
98% higher than surrounding days
Before17.5 µg/m³ Event58 µg/m³ After33.5 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.699 ppm
47% higher than surrounding days
Before0.384 ppm Event0.699 ppm After0.453 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide27.3 ppb
20% higher than surrounding days
Before16.5 ppb Event27.3 ppb After20.7 ppb
Sulfur dioxide7.72 ppb
45% higher than surrounding days
Before5.28 ppb Event7.72 ppb After5.26 ppb
Ozone0.054 ppm
17% higher than surrounding days
Before0.047 ppm Event0.054 ppm After0.045 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Temperature79.6 °F
About the same as surrounding days
Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN
Monitor comparison window 1999-07-12 to 1999-07-19 · PM2.5 target: Indpls- W. 18th St./ Ernie Pyle School 90
Monitor comparison window 1999-07-12 to 1999-07-19
4 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse45.9 µg/m³
82% above nearby days
Carbon monoxide0.402 ppm
9% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.545.9 µg/m³
82% higher than surrounding days
Before21.4 µg/m³ Event45.9 µg/m³ After26.1 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.402 ppm
9% higher than surrounding days
Before0.415 ppm Event0.402 ppm After0.292 ppm
Sulfur dioxide6.64 ppb
33% higher than surrounding days
Before4.63 ppb Event6.64 ppb After4.25 ppb
Ozone0.049 ppm
14% higher than surrounding days
Before0.046 ppm Event0.049 ppm After0.034 ppm
Toledo, OH
Monitor comparison window 1999-07-12 to 1999-07-19 · PM2.5 target: RAPS
3 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse39.7 µg/m³
51% above nearby days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.539.7 µg/m³
51% higher than surrounding days
Before25.7 µg/m³ Event39.7 µg/m³ After22.4 µg/m³
Sulfur dioxide5.43 ppb
29% higher than surrounding days
Before5.24 ppb Event5.43 ppb After3.22 ppb
Ozone0.050 ppm
12% higher than surrounding days
Before0.045 ppm Event0.050 ppm After0.036 ppm
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Air-mass reconstruction
Where the air had been
NOAA HYSPLIT traces the air arriving at each metro backward for 72 hours. Multiple
arrival times and heights show whether the broad path is stable—or sensitive to
assumptions about when and where the polluted layer arrived.
Transport context · not source attribution
Air arriving near Cincinnati
Peak-date arrivals · 1999-07-16
Broad historyMostly south of the metro
72-hour reach350–600 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near Columbus
Peak-date arrivals · 1999-07-16
Broad historyMostly south of the metro
72-hour reach350–600 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near Dayton
Peak-date arrivals · 1999-07-16
Broad historyMostly south of the metro
72-hour reach350–650 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson
Peak-date arrivals · 1999-07-15
Broad historyMostly southeast of the metro
72-hour reach250–700 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near Toledo
Peak-date arrivals · 1999-07-16
Broad historyMostly southwest of the metro
72-hour reach550–750 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near Akron
Peak-date arrivals · 1999-07-16
Broad historyMostly southwest of the metro
72-hour reach400–700 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls
Peak-date arrivals · 1999-07-17
Broad historyMostly southwest of the metro
72-hour reach850–1,400 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near Pittsburgh
Peak-date arrivals · 1999-07-17
Broad historyMostly southwest of the metro
72-hour reach400–750 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near Scranton--Wilkes-Barre--Hazleton
Peak-date arrivals · 1999-07-17
Broad historyMostly southwest of the metro
72-hour reach500–1,100 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Air arriving near Syracuse
Peak-date arrivals · 1999-07-17
Broad historyMostly southwest of the metro
72-hour reach950–1,550 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
6 retained sources
Scientific research
Analysis of a Summertime PM2.5 and Haze Episode in the Mid-Atlantic Region
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
The study identifies July 15-19, 1999 as the strongest PM2.5/haze episode in its summer record. Ammoniated sulfate was the primary cause of the particle-mass buildup, while persistent high pressure, westerly transport, and recirculation slowed pollutant removal.
What it supports
A retained source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.
Limit
Composition measurements were centered on the Baltimore-Washington corridor rather than the five catalog metros; the extension is therefore capped at possible.
Scientific research
Analysis of a Summertime PM2.5 and Haze Episode in the Mid-Atlantic Region
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
The paper identifies July 15-19, 1999 as the strongest PM2.5/haze episode in its record and attributes the particle buildup primarily to ammoniated sulfate under high pressure, westerly transport, and recirculation.
What it supports
A retained source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.
Limit
The composition site was downwind of these metros, so the corridor match cannot exceed possible confidence.
Scientific research
Analysis of a Summertime PM2.5 and Haze Episode in the Mid-Atlantic Region
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
The study identifies July 15-19, 1999 as the summer's strongest regional PM2.5/haze episode and attributes the mass buildup primarily to ammoniated sulfate under persistent high pressure, westerly transport, and recirculation.
What it supports
A retained source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.
Limit
The intensive composition measurements were south of these metros, so confidence remains possible.
Scientific research
Numerical Investigation of Boundary-Layer Evolution and Nocturnal Low-Level Jets: Local versus Nonlocal PBL Schemes
Environmental Fluid Mechanics
The study treats July 15-19 as an eastern U.S. ozone and PM2.5 episode under persistent high pressure, high temperatures, and westerly flow favorable for transporting pollutants from the Midwest toward the Northeast.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
This source establishes the regional meteorology and transport corridor, not the particle composition at each catalog metro.
Scientific research
Numerical Investigation of Boundary-Layer Evolution and Nocturnal Low-Level Jets: Local versus Nonlocal PBL Schemes
Environmental Fluid Mechanics
The meteorological study describes the exact period as an eastern U.S. PM2.5 episode with persistent high pressure and westerly pollutant transport from the Midwest toward the Northeast.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
It documents the regional transport mechanism, not a unique emitting source.
Scientific research
Numerical Investigation of Boundary-Layer Evolution and Nocturnal Low-Level Jets: Local versus Nonlocal PBL Schemes
Environmental Fluid Mechanics
The paper describes the exact period as an eastern U.S. PM2.5 episode under persistent high pressure and westerly transport from the Midwest into the Northeast.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The paper supplies regional episode meteorology rather than city-specific source apportionment.
What remains uncertain
The episode is regionally documented, but no source apportions the catalog value separately for each Ohio or Indiana metro.
The regional episode is documented, but the studies do not apportion Scranton and Syracuse separately.
The studies establish a corridor-scale episode but do not apportion Akron, Buffalo, and Pittsburgh separately.
Status and provenance
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.