1999-07-14 Birmingham-Hoover, AL regional secondary-particle pollution episode
July 14, 1999
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 55.1 µg/m³ near Birmingham across
1 covered metro home to 1.2 million people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 1.9 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 2.3 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Regional secondary PM”
Birmingham-Hoover, AL's 7-monitor PM2.5 episode reached 39.15 µg/m³, 1.583 times the adjacent-window level, during 58% light-wind hours, 7 haze hours. Exact-date regional speciation sites measured 84.0% to 84.0% of reconstructed mass as ammonium sulfate plus ammonium nitrate. Together these measurements support regional secondary PM at possible confidence; the regional sites did not directly sample the city and no particular source region is assigned.
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
National Weather Service surface observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Jul 14, 1999hypothesis
BIRMINGHAM MUNI recorded calm conditions during 25% of event hours and wind at or below three knots during 58%. Observations included 7 haze hours, 4 mist hours, minimum visibility 4 miles.
EPA records show median daily PM2.5 of 39.15 micrograms per cubic meter across 7 monitors, 1.583 times the adjacent-window level. Co-pollutants at least 10% above the adjacent-window comparison were pm10 (1.2x), sulfur dioxide (1.729x). Other measured comparisons were carbon monoxide (0.553x), nitrogen dioxide (1.087x).
U.S. EPA AirData Chemical Speciation · Jul 14, 1999hypothesis
On the exact event date, 1 EPA speciation site within 250 km measured a majority of reconstructed PM2.5 mass as ammonium sulfate plus ammonium nitrate: Sipsey Wilderness (101.3 km; 84.0%; reconstructed mass 29.0 µg/m³).
Inference, not direct attribution
nearby_exact_date_secondary_inorganic_regional_context.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Regional secondary PM” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Birmingham-Hoover, AL
Monitor comparison window 1999-07-11 to 1999-07-17 · PM2.5 target: Wylam
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse39.1 µg/m³
34% above nearby days
Air movement3 kt median wind
6 calm hours observed
What observers saw4 mi minimum visibility
Haze reported during 7 hours
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.539.1 µg/m³
34% higher than surrounding days
Before20.1 µg/m³ Event39.1 µg/m³ After29.3 µg/m³
PM1042 µg/m³
18% higher than surrounding days
Before35.5 µg/m³ Event42 µg/m³ After34.5 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.329 ppm
42% lower than surrounding days
Before0.570 ppm Event0.329 ppm After0.621 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide7.14 ppb
About the same as surrounding days
Before4.92 ppb Event7.14 ppb After8.21 ppb
Sulfur dioxide9.29 ppb
56% higher than surrounding days
Before5.96 ppb Event9.29 ppb After4.79 ppb
Ozone0.034 ppm
40% higher than surrounding days
Before0.021 ppm Event0.034 ppm After0.025 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
BIRMINGHAM MUNI, 18.2 km from the PM2.5 target
Wind3 kt median
7 kt maximum · 6 of 24 observed hours calm
Visibility4 mi minimum
0 observed hours at or below 3 miles
Temperature76.5°F median
69°F to 83°F
Humidity77% median
93% maximum
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Air-mass reconstruction
Where the air had been
NOAA HYSPLIT traces the air arriving at each metro backward for 72 hours. Multiple
arrival times and heights show whether the broad path is stable—or sensitive to
assumptions about when and where the polluted layer arrived.
Transport context · not source attribution
Air arriving near Birmingham-Hoover
Peak-date arrivals · 1999-07-14
Broad historyMostly north of the metro
72-hour reach300–850 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
3 retained sources
Official record
Birmingham-Hoover, AL regional PM2.5 composition context, 1999-07-14
U.S. EPA AirData Chemical Speciation
On the exact event date, 1 EPA speciation site within 250 km measured a majority of reconstructed PM2.5 mass as ammonium sulfate plus ammonium nitrate: Sipsey Wilderness (101.3 km; 84.0%; reconstructed mass 29.0 µg/m³).
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The usable composition site was 101.3 km from the affected-place PM2.5 target and did not directly measure the city air.
Official record
Birmingham-Hoover, AL surface conditions, 1999-07-14
National Weather Service surface observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet
BIRMINGHAM MUNI recorded calm conditions during 25% of event hours and wind at or below three knots during 58%. Observations included 7 haze hours, 4 mist hours, minimum visibility 4 miles.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
A single surface station documents weak ventilation and obscuration but not the full vertical profile or particle source mix.
Official record
Birmingham-Hoover, AL joint pollution fingerprint, 1999-07-14
U.S. EPA AirData
EPA records show median daily PM2.5 of 39.15 micrograms per cubic meter across 7 monitors, 1.583 times the adjacent-window level. Co-pollutants at least 10% above the adjacent-window comparison were pm10 (1.2x), sulfur dioxide (1.729x). Other measured comparisons were carbon monoxide (0.553x), nitrogen dioxide (1.087x).
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The pollution fingerprint does not uniquely apportion traffic, heating, industry, wood combustion, or secondary aerosol.
What remains uncertain
A single surface station documents weak ventilation and obscuration but not the full vertical profile or particle source mix.
Chemical composition identifies an aerosol mechanism, not a particular emitting facility or source region.
Same-date regional composition and distance do not by themselves prove that every site sampled one shared air mass.
The 50% majority is an IAQng catalog convention and not an EPA source-attribution threshold.
The pollution fingerprint does not uniquely apportion traffic, heating, industry, wood combustion, or secondary aerosol.
The same pattern also occurred in benchmark temperature-inversion and regional-secondary-PM episodes.
The strict joint-fingerprint rule achieved 22.2% precision for stagnant mixed pollution on the 56-case labeled benchmark.
The usable composition site was 101.3 km from the affected-place PM2.5 target and did not directly measure the city air.
Status and provenance
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.