← Air events

Regional secondary PM Possible

1999-07-14 Birmingham-Hoover, AL regional secondary-particle pollution episode

July 14, 1999

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 55.1 µg/m³ near Birmingham across 1 covered metro home to 1.2 million people.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 1.9 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 2.3 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Regional secondary PM”

Birmingham-Hoover, AL's 7-monitor PM2.5 episode reached 39.15 µg/m³, 1.583 times the adjacent-window level, during 58% light-wind hours, 7 haze hours. Exact-date regional speciation sites measured 84.0% to 84.0% of reconstructed mass as ammonium sulfate plus ammonium nitrate. Together these measurements support regional secondary PM at possible confidence; the regional sites did not directly sample the city and no particular source region is assigned.

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

National Weather Service surface observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet · Jul 14, 1999 hypothesis

Birmingham-Hoover, AL surface conditions, 1999-07-14

BIRMINGHAM MUNI recorded calm conditions during 25% of event hours and wind at or below three knots during 58%. Observations included 7 haze hours, 4 mist hours, minimum visibility 4 miles.

U.S. EPA AirData hypothesis

Birmingham-Hoover, AL joint pollution fingerprint, 1999-07-14

EPA records show median daily PM2.5 of 39.15 micrograms per cubic meter across 7 monitors, 1.583 times the adjacent-window level. Co-pollutants at least 10% above the adjacent-window comparison were pm10 (1.2x), sulfur dioxide (1.729x). Other measured comparisons were carbon monoxide (0.553x), nitrogen dioxide (1.087x).

U.S. EPA AirData Chemical Speciation · Jul 14, 1999 hypothesis

Birmingham-Hoover, AL regional PM2.5 composition context, 1999-07-14

On the exact event date, 1 EPA speciation site within 250 km measured a majority of reconstructed PM2.5 mass as ammonium sulfate plus ammonium nitrate: Sipsey Wilderness (101.3 km; 84.0%; reconstructed mass 29.0 µg/m³).

Inference, not direct attribution

nearby_exact_date_secondary_inorganic_regional_context.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Pattern-based explanation

    nearby_exact_date_secondary_inorganic_regional_context.v1. This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.

    Inferred
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The 72-hour air-mass history is reconstructed

    NOAA HYSPLIT modeled 12 backward paths across multiple arrival times and heights. They show where the air traveled, not which source polluted it.

    Explore the modeled paths ↓
    Modeled
  3. 3

    Local response

    55.1 µg/m³ near Birmingham

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.5 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Regional secondary PM” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Birmingham-Hoover, AL

Monitor comparison window 1999-07-11 to 1999-07-17 · PM2.5 target: Wylam

6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 39.1 µg/m³

34% above nearby days

Air movement 3 kt median wind

6 calm hours observed

What observers saw 4 mi minimum visibility

Haze reported during 7 hours

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 39.1 µg/m³

34% higher than surrounding days

Before20.1 µg/m³ Event39.1 µg/m³ After29.3 µg/m³
7 monitors · 24 HOUR
PM10 42 µg/m³

18% higher than surrounding days

Before35.5 µg/m³ Event42 µg/m³ After34.5 µg/m³
4 monitors · 24-HR BLK AVG
Carbon monoxide 0.329 ppm

42% lower than surrounding days

Before0.570 ppm Event0.329 ppm After0.621 ppm
3 monitors · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 7.14 ppb

About the same as surrounding days

Before4.92 ppb Event7.14 ppb After8.21 ppb
1 monitor · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 9.29 ppb

56% higher than surrounding days

Before5.96 ppb Event9.29 ppb After4.79 ppb
1 monitor · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.034 ppm

40% higher than surrounding days

Before0.021 ppm Event0.034 ppm After0.025 ppm
6 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

BIRMINGHAM MUNI, 18.2 km from the PM2.5 target
Wind 3 kt median

7 kt maximum · 6 of 24 observed hours calm

Visibility 4 mi minimum

0 observed hours at or below 3 miles

Temperature 76.5°F median

69°F to 83°F

Humidity 77% median

93% maximum

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Air-mass reconstruction

Where the air had been

NOAA HYSPLIT traces the air arriving at each metro backward for 72 hours. Multiple arrival times and heights show whether the broad path is stable—or sensitive to assumptions about when and where the polluted layer arrived.

Transport context · not source attribution

Air arriving near Birmingham-Hoover

Peak-date arrivals · 1999-07-14

Broad history Mostly north of the metro
72-hour reach 300–850 km
Sensitivity runs 12 modeled paths
Arrival metro
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m

Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions. A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Views from the selected metro

Camera views near

Browse the camera map →

Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Birmingham-Hoover, AL 55.1 µg/m³ 2.5 Jul 14, 1999 #22 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

3 retained sources

Official record

Birmingham-Hoover, AL regional PM2.5 composition context, 1999-07-14

U.S. EPA AirData Chemical Speciation

On the exact event date, 1 EPA speciation site within 250 km measured a majority of reconstructed PM2.5 mass as ammonium sulfate plus ammonium nitrate: Sipsey Wilderness (101.3 km; 84.0%; reconstructed mass 29.0 µg/m³).

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

The usable composition site was 101.3 km from the affected-place PM2.5 target and did not directly measure the city air.

Official record

Birmingham-Hoover, AL surface conditions, 1999-07-14

National Weather Service surface observations via Iowa Environmental Mesonet

BIRMINGHAM MUNI recorded calm conditions during 25% of event hours and wind at or below three knots during 58%. Observations included 7 haze hours, 4 mist hours, minimum visibility 4 miles.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

A single surface station documents weak ventilation and obscuration but not the full vertical profile or particle source mix.

Official record

Birmingham-Hoover, AL joint pollution fingerprint, 1999-07-14

U.S. EPA AirData

EPA records show median daily PM2.5 of 39.15 micrograms per cubic meter across 7 monitors, 1.583 times the adjacent-window level. Co-pollutants at least 10% above the adjacent-window comparison were pm10 (1.2x), sulfur dioxide (1.729x). Other measured comparisons were carbon monoxide (0.553x), nitrogen dioxide (1.087x).

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

The pollution fingerprint does not uniquely apportion traffic, heating, industry, wood combustion, or secondary aerosol.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.