February 19, 2026 · Origin: Vegetation burning in Mexico
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 35.2 µg/m³ near San Antonio across
1 covered metro home to 2.8 million people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 1.2 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 3.3 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Prescribed fire”
NWS retrospectively identifies February 2026 as an early occurrence of Mexican vegetation-burning smoke transported as far north as San Antonio under southerly flow and an inversion. The exact San Antonio pollution fingerprint independently shows a sharp, broad particle and combustion-tracer response.
LikelyApplicable reporting or a supported inference makes this the best current causal explanation.
National Weather Service Brownsville/Rio Grande Valley · Mar 1, 2026official
NWS explains that vegetation-burning smoke carried north from Mexico can reach Austin and San Antonio under persistent southerly flow and inversions, and explicitly notes that this poor-air episode arrived as early as February in 2026.
Reporting based on NWS Brownsville attributed South Texas haze on February 19 to smoke and soot from Mexico trapped under a sharp inversion; San Antonio also registered elevated PM2.5 that day.
U.S. EPA Air Quality System; IAQng event-autopsy calculation v1 hypothesis
EPA observations show San Antonio PM2.5 near 33.3 µg/m³, about six times the preceding comparison value, while PM10 reached 57 µg/m³ and sulfur dioxide rose by roughly an order of magnitude. The broad particle and combustion-tracer response fits the NWS transported-smoke account.
Inference, not direct attribution
official_retrospective_transport_plus_exact_fingerprint_likely.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
NWS explains that vegetation-burning smoke carried north from Mexico can reach Austin and San Antonio under persistent southerly flow and inversions, and explicitly notes that this poor-air episode arrived as early as February in 2026.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Prescribed fire” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX
Monitor comparison window 2026-02-16 to 2026-02-22 · PM2.5 target: Von Ormy Highway 16
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse33.3 µg/m³
226% above nearby days
Air movement3.69 kt
6% lower than surrounding days
PM1057 µg/m³
73% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.533.3 µg/m³
226% higher than surrounding days
Before5.58 µg/m³ Event33.3 µg/m³ After10.2 µg/m³
PM1057 µg/m³
73% higher than surrounding days
Before23 µg/m³ Event57 µg/m³ After33 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.250 ppm
9% higher than surrounding days
Before0.212 ppm Event0.250 ppm After0.229 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide4.20 ppb
6% lower than surrounding days
Before6.77 ppb Event4.20 ppb After4.05 ppb
Sulfur dioxide0.379 ppb
456% higher than surrounding days
Before0.037 ppb Event0.379 ppb After0.068 ppb
Ozone0.033 ppm
9% lower than surrounding days
Before0.037 ppm Event0.033 ppm After0.039 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Temperature72 °F
6% higher than surrounding days
Wind3.69 kt
6% lower than surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Air-mass reconstruction
Where the air had been
NOAA HYSPLIT traces the air arriving at each metro backward for 72 hours. Multiple
arrival times and heights show whether the broad path is stable—or sensitive to
assumptions about when and where the polluted layer arrived.
Transport context · not source attribution
Air arriving near San Antonio-New Braunfels
Peak-date arrivals · 2026-02-19
Broad historyMostly west of the metro
72-hour reach700–3,450 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
3 retained sources
Official record
2026 Rio Grande Valley Hazardous Weather Awareness Guide: Air Quality
National Weather Service Brownsville/Rio Grande Valley
NWS explains that vegetation-burning smoke carried north from Mexico can reach Austin and San Antonio under persistent southerly flow and inversions, and explicitly notes that this poor-air episode arrived as early as February in 2026.
What it supports
An official source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.
Limit
The guide identifies the transported-smoke mechanism and geographic reach but does not quantify the San Antonio PM2.5 source fraction or name individual burns.
Official record
San Antonio pollution fingerprint, February 19, 2026
U.S. EPA Air Quality System; IAQng event-autopsy calculation v1
EPA observations show San Antonio PM2.5 near 33.3 µg/m³, about six times the preceding comparison value, while PM10 reached 57 µg/m³ and sulfur dioxide rose by roughly an order of magnitude. The broad particle and combustion-tracer response fits the NWS transported-smoke account.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The descriptive metro fingerprint is not a collocated chemical source-apportionment result.
News report
Mexico air pollution prompts breathing concerns in South Texas
MySA / NWS Brownsville
Reporting based on NWS Brownsville attributed South Texas haze on February 19 to smoke and soot from Mexico trapped under a sharp inversion; San Antonio also registered elevated PM2.5 that day.
What it supports
A retained source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.
Limit
The NWS causal statement directly covers the Rio Grande Valley, not San Antonio.
What remains uncertain
The origin is assigned at the broad Mexico vegetation-burning level; individual burns and their fractional contribution are not known.
Status and provenance
LikelyApplicable reporting or a supported inference makes this the best current causal explanation.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.