← Air events

Prescribed fire Possible

2024-02-21 Kansas City, MO-KS prescribed-fire smoke episode

February 21, 2024

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 39.1 µg/m³ near Kansas City across 1 covered metro home to 2.3 million people.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 1.3 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 2.9 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Prescribed fire”

NOAA mapped a large central-U.S. smoke layer from heavy seasonal burning across Missouri on the exact date, but did not establish surface attribution at Kansas City.

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Source not directly documented

    The catalog has a grouping hypothesis, but no retained source directly establishes the proposed cause.

    Open question
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    Transport into the affected region is documented

    NOAA reported thin to moderate smoke from heavy seasonal fire activity across a corridor including Missouri on February 21.

    View transport source ↗
    Documented
  3. 3

    Local response

    39.1 µg/m³ near Kansas City

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 1.8 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Prescribed fire” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Kansas City, MO-KS

Monitor comparison window 2024-02-18 to 2024-02-24 · PM2.5 target: JFK

5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 20.9 µg/m³

197% above nearby days

Air movement 5.50 kt

26% lower than surrounding days

PM10 64 µg/m³

142% higher than surrounding days

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 20.9 µg/m³

197% higher than surrounding days

Before6.90 µg/m³ Event20.9 µg/m³ After10.3 µg/m³
5 monitors · 1 HOUR
PM10 64 µg/m³

142% higher than surrounding days

Before26.5 µg/m³ Event64 µg/m³ After26.5 µg/m³
4 monitors · 24-HR BLK AVG
Nitrogen dioxide 28.8 ppb

12% higher than surrounding days

Before25.7 ppb Event28.8 ppb After20.4 ppb
1 monitor · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 1.03 ppb

45% higher than surrounding days

Before0.710 ppb Event1.03 ppb After0.698 ppb
2 monitors · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.033 ppm

6% lower than surrounding days

Before0.029 ppm Event0.033 ppm After0.036 ppm
5 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity 50.9 %

6% higher than surrounding days

Pressure 975 Millibars

About the same as surrounding days

Temperature 56.5 °F

11% higher than surrounding days

Wind 5.50 kt

26% lower than surrounding days

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Kansas City, MO-KS 39.1 µg/m³ 1.8 Feb 21, 2024 #23 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

1 retained source

Official record

Smoke analysis through 0335 UTC February 22, 2024

NOAA Satellite Services Division

NOAA reported thin to moderate smoke from heavy seasonal fire activity across a corridor including Missouri on February 21.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

Smoke could have been aloft; the narrative does not name Kansas City or quantify surface impact.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.