← Air events

Mixed causes Possible

2005-06-23 to 2005-06-28 Eastern U.S. regional haze mixture episode

June 23, 2005 to June 28, 2005 · Origin: Eastern U.S. regional haze mixture

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 77.8 µg/m³ near Pittsburgh across 3 covered metros home to 4.5 million people. 1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 4.1 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 19 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Mixed causes”

Manual research connected 3 source events to one mixed-source pollution episode using the deterministic grouping rule.

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency official

Enclosure 1

EPA's review found a widespread sulfate event across the Southeast on June 24, 2005 and found the Kentucky wildfire evidence insufficient for causal attribution. The source supplies regional context only for the June 24 Little Rock and Memphis observations.

NASA Earth Observatory corroborates

Haze over the United States

NASA describes particle pollution across the Mississippi River Valley and Deep South from June 20 onward, with stable humid air trapping aerosol from vehicles, power plants, and fires; its June 23 satellite image shows the haze over the lower Midwest and Gulf region.

NASA Earth Observatory · Jun 24, 2005 corroborates

Haze Over the United States

NASA documented a broad eastern U.S. haze episode during the event window caused by stable humid conditions retaining particles from vehicles, power plants, and fires.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Sequence: Little Rock (Jun 23) → Memphis (Jun 23) → Pittsburgh (Jun 25)

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Mixed causes

    NASA describes particle pollution across the Mississippi River Valley and Deep South from June 20 onward, with stable humid air trapping aerosol from vehicles, power plants, and fires; its June 23 satellite image shows the haze over the lower…

    View supporting source ↗
    Documented
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    Transport into the affected region is documented

    NASA describes particle pollution across the Mississippi River Valley and Deep South from June 20 onward, with stable humid air trapping aerosol from vehicles, power plants, and fires; its June 23 satellite image shows the haze over the lower…

    View transport source ↗
    Documented
  3. 3

    Local response

    77.8 µg/m³ near Pittsburgh

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 3 metros. The peak daily concentration is roughly 3.5 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Mixed causes” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Pittsburgh, PA

Monitor comparison window 2005-06-22 to 2005-06-28 · PM2.5 target: Liberty

6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 48.1 µg/m³

37% above nearby days

PM10 62 µg/m³

22% higher than surrounding days

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 48.1 µg/m³

37% higher than surrounding days

Before25.2 µg/m³ Event48.1 µg/m³ After35 µg/m³
17 monitors · 24 HOUR
PM10 62 µg/m³

22% higher than surrounding days

Before36 µg/m³ Event62 µg/m³ After51 µg/m³
11 monitors · 24-HR BLK AVG
Carbon monoxide 0.313 ppm

About the same as surrounding days

Before0.173 ppm Event0.313 ppm After0.317 ppm
6 monitors · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 13.1 ppb

About the same as surrounding days

Before12.6 ppb Event13.1 ppb After12.5 ppb
8 monitors · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 10.1 ppb

About the same as surrounding days

Before10.4 ppb Event10.1 ppb After9.81 ppb
14 monitors · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.055 ppm

25% higher than surrounding days

Before0.042 ppm Event0.055 ppm After0.044 ppm
13 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Views from the selected metro

Camera views near

Browse the camera map →

Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Pittsburgh, PA 77.8 µg/m³ 3.5 Jun 25, 2005 #13 of its top days
Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR 48.5 µg/m³ 10.0 Jun 24, 2005 #2 of its top days
Memphis, TN-MS-AR 44.2 µg/m³ 5.8 Jun 24, 2005 #13 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

3 retained sources

Official record

Haze Over the United States

NASA Earth Observatory

NASA documented a broad eastern U.S. haze episode during the event window caused by stable humid conditions retaining particles from vehicles, power plants, and fires.

What it supports

A retained source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.

Limit

Pittsburgh is near the edge of the narrative's named regions and no local source share is given.

Official record

Haze Over the United States

NASA Earth Observatory

NASA reported that haze lingering from June 20 into early July across the lower Midwest and Deep South combined particles from vehicles, power plants, and fires under stable humid conditions.

What it supports

A retained source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.

Limit

The regional account does not quantify source shares in Little Rock.

Official record

Haze over the United States

NASA Earth Observatory

NASA describes particle pollution across the Mississippi River Valley and Deep South from June 20 onward, with stable humid air trapping aerosol from vehicles, power plants, and fires; its June 23 satellite image shows the haze over the lower Midwest and Gulf region.

What it supports

A retained source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.

Limit

The source mixture is regional and not apportioned by metro.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.