Daily PM2.5 peaked at 60.6 µg/m³ near Detroit across
1 covered metro home to 4.4 million people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 2.2 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 9.7 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Mixed causes”
EPA's exact-period account attributes the June 20-28 regional event to man-made pollution plus some smoke and places the aerosol buildup in the Midwest before transport east. Detroit on June 24 fits that documented regional episode.
LikelyApplicable reporting or a supported inference makes this the best current causal explanation.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency / Federal Register · Jan 30, 2004official
EPA describes the June 20-28, 2002 Central and Eastern U.S. haze event as a combination of man-made pollutants and some smoke, with aerosol buildup in the Midwest followed by transport into the Northeast.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
EPA describes the June 20-28, 2002 Central and Eastern U.S. haze event as a combination of man-made pollutants and some smoke, with aerosol buildup in the Midwest followed by transport into the Northeast.
The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to
these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.
Research gap
3
Local response
60.6 µg/m³ near Detroit
EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro.
The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.8 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Mixed causes” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI
Monitor comparison window 2002-06-21 to 2002-06-27 · PM2.5 target: DET-LINWOOD
6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse58.8 µg/m³
71% above nearby days
Air movement2.28 kt
12% lower than surrounding days
PM10106 µg/m³
41% higher than surrounding days
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.558.8 µg/m³
71% higher than surrounding days
Before34.4 µg/m³ Event58.8 µg/m³ After15.9 µg/m³
PM10106 µg/m³
41% higher than surrounding days
Before75 µg/m³ Event106 µg/m³ After69 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.631 ppm
49% higher than surrounding days
Before0.485 ppm Event0.631 ppm After0.208 ppm
Nitrogen dioxide21 ppb
14% higher than surrounding days
Before19.4 ppb Event21 ppb After17 ppb
Sulfur dioxide7.94 ppb
35% higher than surrounding days
Before5.89 ppb Event7.94 ppb After1.67 ppb
Ozone0.057 ppm
8% higher than surrounding days
Before0.053 ppm Event0.057 ppm After0.045 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity56.8 %
15% lower than surrounding days
Pressure996 Millibars
About the same as surrounding days
Temperature83.4 °F
6% higher than surrounding days
Wind2.28 kt
12% lower than surrounding days
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
1 retained source
Official record
Air Quality Designations and Classifications for the Fine Particles National Ambient Air Quality Standards
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency / Federal Register
EPA describes the June 20-28, 2002 Central and Eastern U.S. haze event as a combination of man-made pollutants and some smoke, with aerosol buildup in the Midwest followed by transport into the Northeast.
What it supports
An official source supports the attributed cause for the stated place and dates.
Limit
The regional account does not apportion Detroit's daily mass between anthropogenic pollution and smoke or name a fire.
What remains uncertain
The broad mixed cause is supported; a specific source and shares are not.
Status and provenance
LikelyApplicable reporting or a supported inference makes this the best current causal explanation.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.