2001-11-12 Birmingham-Hoover, AL mixed-source pollution episode
November 12, 2001
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 54.2 µg/m³ near Birmingham across
1 covered metro home to 1.2 million people.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the
average affected resident ≈ 1.9 cigarettes.
Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of
≈ 2.2 million cigarettes.
An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³
per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a
medical dose.
Why we think this happened
The basis for “Mixed causes”
EPA's PMF source-apportionment appendix contains an actual sample for Birmingham on November 12, 2001. Mobile sources were the largest modeled factor, while coal combustion and ammonium nitrate also contributed. That exact-date, multi-factor result supports mixed-source pollution at possible confidence without identifying a unique emitter or extending the finding beyond Birmingham.
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency · Sep 24, 2003hypothesis
EPA's Positive Matrix Factorization time series includes an actual sample at site 01-073-0023 on 2001-11-12; mobile sources were the largest modeled factor, with coal combustion and ammonium nitrate also contributing.
Inference, not direct attribution
epa_pmf_exact_sample_factor_pattern.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.
A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened,
the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much
of that chain is documented for this event.
Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather
stations show what changed. This context tests the “Mixed causes” explanation; it does
not assign the cause by itself.
Observed context · not attribution
Birmingham-Hoover, AL
Monitor comparison window 2001-11-09 to 2001-11-15 · PM2.5 target: Wylam
5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse20.8 µg/m³
8% below nearby days
Air movement6 kt median wind
6 calm hours observed
What observers saw10 mi minimum visibility
0 hours at or below 3 miles
Pollution fingerprint
Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.520.8 µg/m³
8% lower than surrounding days
Before23 µg/m³ Event20.8 µg/m³ After19.5 µg/m³
PM1047 µg/m³
About the same as surrounding days
Before47.5 µg/m³ Event47 µg/m³ After41.5 µg/m³
Carbon monoxide0.600 ppm
39% lower than surrounding days
Before2.12 ppm Event0.600 ppm After0.666 ppm
Sulfur dioxide5.83 ppb
9% higher than surrounding days
Before5.33 ppb Event5.83 ppb After5.26 ppb
Ozone0.025 ppm
74% higher than surrounding days
Before0.011 ppm Event0.025 ppm After0.015 ppm
Atmospheric conditions
BIRMINGHAM MUNI, 18.2 km from the PM2.5 target
Wind6 kt median
11 kt maximum · 6 of 24 observed hours calm
Visibility10 mi minimum
0 observed hours at or below 3 miles
Temperature61°F median
40°F to 71°F
Humidity55% median
100% maximum
Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS
surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set;
missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate
layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.
Air-mass reconstruction
Where the air had been
NOAA HYSPLIT traces the air arriving at each metro backward for 72 hours. Multiple
arrival times and heights show whether the broad path is stable—or sensitive to
assumptions about when and where the polluted layer arrived.
Transport context · not source attribution
Air arriving near Birmingham-Hoover
Peak-date arrivals · 2001-11-12
Broad historyMostly northwest of the metro
72-hour reach450–3,000 km
Sensitivity runs12 modeled paths
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m
Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents
arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions.
A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.
Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond
them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent
of the smoke.
—
Episode peak
--cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between
covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading,
click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches
the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or
play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an
air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.
No useful public camera views are currently available within 80 km of this metro.
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per
cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the
illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's
ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each
metro's Air Records page.
Public evidence library
What supports this account
Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.
3 retained sources
Official record
Appendix D: Birmingham, Alabama: exact-date PMF source strengths on 2001-11-12
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EPA's Positive Matrix Factorization time series includes an actual sample at site 01-073-0023 on 2001-11-12; mobile sources were the largest modeled factor, with coal combustion and ammonium nitrate also contributing.
What it supports
This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.
Limit
The appendix reports modeled factor contributions at one chemical-speciation monitor, not the complete metro-wide emissions inventory.
Official record
Eight-Site Source Apportionment of PM2.5 Speciation Trends Data
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EPA's site summary identifies mobile, coal-combustion, ammonium-nitrate, crustal, vegetative-burning/fireworks, lead, and zinc factors at the Birmingham trends site. The report documents the site's modeled date range, factor interpretation, average apportioned mass, local source setting, and back-trajectory context.
What it supports
Context for the event; this item does not establish the attributed cause by itself.
Limit
The site summary defines and contextualizes the factors across the modeled period; the separate appendix supplies the event-date source strengths.
Scientific research
Southern Fine Particulate Monitoring Project
U.S. Department of Energy OSTI
The project collected continuous PM2.5 mass, sulfate, size-distribution, and light-scattering measurements at North Birmingham throughout October-December 2001.
What it supports
Context for the event; this item does not establish the attributed cause by itself.
Limit
The accessible summary does not state the November 12 composition or cause.
What remains uncertain
A PMF factor is a statistical source profile; it does not by itself identify a unique facility, fire, or transport path.
Period-average factor descriptions do not establish that every listed source category dominated this particular event day.
The appendix reports modeled factor contributions at one chemical-speciation monitor, not the complete metro-wide emissions inventory.
The exact-date result is a source-apportionment estimate at one monitor and remains capped at possible confidence in the IAQng catalog.
The qualitative ordering is read from EPA's exact-date source-strength plots after accounting for each factor's different mean-mass scale; no unsupported interpolated dates are used.
The retained material is useful for follow-up but does not responsibly attribute the supplied event.
The site summary defines and contextualizes the factors across the modeled period; the separate appendix supplies the event-date source strengths.
Status and provenance
PossibleThis is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.
This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given
its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and
signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates.
Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the
assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong,
tell us.