← Air events

Mixed causes Possible

2001-11-12 Birmingham-Hoover, AL mixed-source pollution episode

November 12, 2001

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 54.2 µg/m³ near Birmingham across 1 covered metro home to 1.2 million people.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 1.9 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 2.2 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Mixed causes”

EPA's PMF source-apportionment appendix contains an actual sample for Birmingham on November 12, 2001. Mobile sources were the largest modeled factor, while coal combustion and ammonium nitrate also contributed. That exact-date, multi-factor result supports mixed-source pollution at possible confidence without identifying a unique emitter or extending the finding beyond Birmingham.

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

Inference, not direct attribution

epa_pmf_exact_sample_factor_pattern.v1: This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Pattern-based explanation

    epa_pmf_exact_sample_factor_pattern.v1. This inference is recorded in the catalog methodology.

    Inferred
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The 72-hour air-mass history is reconstructed

    NOAA HYSPLIT modeled 12 backward paths across multiple arrival times and heights. They show where the air traveled, not which source polluted it.

    Explore the modeled paths ↓
    Modeled
  3. 3

    Local response

    54.2 µg/m³ near Birmingham

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.5 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Mixed causes” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Birmingham-Hoover, AL

Monitor comparison window 2001-11-09 to 2001-11-15 · PM2.5 target: Wylam

5 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 20.8 µg/m³

8% below nearby days

Air movement 6 kt median wind

6 calm hours observed

What observers saw 10 mi minimum visibility

0 hours at or below 3 miles

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 20.8 µg/m³

8% lower than surrounding days

Before23 µg/m³ Event20.8 µg/m³ After19.5 µg/m³
8 monitors · 24 HOUR
PM10 47 µg/m³

About the same as surrounding days

Before47.5 µg/m³ Event47 µg/m³ After41.5 µg/m³
4 monitors · 24-HR BLK AVG
Carbon monoxide 0.600 ppm

39% lower than surrounding days

Before2.12 ppm Event0.600 ppm After0.666 ppm
3 monitors · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 5.83 ppb

9% higher than surrounding days

Before5.33 ppb Event5.83 ppb After5.26 ppb
1 monitor · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.025 ppm

74% higher than surrounding days

Before0.011 ppm Event0.025 ppm After0.015 ppm
1 monitor · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

BIRMINGHAM MUNI, 18.2 km from the PM2.5 target
Wind 6 kt median

11 kt maximum · 6 of 24 observed hours calm

Visibility 10 mi minimum

0 observed hours at or below 3 miles

Temperature 61°F median

40°F to 71°F

Humidity 55% median

100% maximum

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Air-mass reconstruction

Where the air had been

NOAA HYSPLIT traces the air arriving at each metro backward for 72 hours. Multiple arrival times and heights show whether the broad path is stable—or sensitive to assumptions about when and where the polluted layer arrived.

Transport context · not source attribution

Air arriving near Birmingham-Hoover

Peak-date arrivals · 2001-11-12

Broad history Mostly northwest of the metro
72-hour reach 450–3,000 km
Sensitivity runs 12 modeled paths
Arrival metro
Near surface · 100 mLower atmosphere · 500 mHigher layer · 1,000 m

Each line begins 72 hours before arrival and points toward the metro. Color represents arrival height; repeated lines represent 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC arrival assumptions. A path can show where the air traveled, but it cannot prove which source added the PM2.5.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Views from the selected metro

Camera views near

Browse the camera map →

Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Birmingham-Hoover, AL 54.2 µg/m³ 2.5 Nov 12, 2001 #24 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

3 retained sources

Official record

Appendix D: Birmingham, Alabama: exact-date PMF source strengths on 2001-11-12

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

EPA's Positive Matrix Factorization time series includes an actual sample at site 01-073-0023 on 2001-11-12; mobile sources were the largest modeled factor, with coal combustion and ammonium nitrate also contributing.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

The appendix reports modeled factor contributions at one chemical-speciation monitor, not the complete metro-wide emissions inventory.

Official record

Eight-Site Source Apportionment of PM2.5 Speciation Trends Data

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

EPA's site summary identifies mobile, coal-combustion, ammonium-nitrate, crustal, vegetative-burning/fireworks, lead, and zinc factors at the Birmingham trends site. The report documents the site's modeled date range, factor interpretation, average apportioned mass, local source setting, and back-trajectory context.

What it supports

Context for the event; this item does not establish the attributed cause by itself.

Limit

The site summary defines and contextualizes the factors across the modeled period; the separate appendix supplies the event-date source strengths.

Scientific research

Southern Fine Particulate Monitoring Project

U.S. Department of Energy OSTI

The project collected continuous PM2.5 mass, sulfate, size-distribution, and light-scattering measurements at North Birmingham throughout October-December 2001.

What it supports

Context for the event; this item does not establish the attributed cause by itself.

Limit

The accessible summary does not state the November 12 composition or cause.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.