← Air events

Mixed causes Possible

2001-06-30 Rochester, NY and Syracuse, NY mixed-source pollution episode

June 30, 2001

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 39.9 µg/m³ near Rochester across 2 covered metros home to 1.7 million people.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 1.5 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 2.6 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Mixed causes”

NASA documented a large exact-period aerosol shroud and poor-air advisories over the eastern U.S., while explicitly describing the aerosol as a possible mixture of pollution and smoke.

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

NASA Earth Observatory · Jun 28, 2001 hypothesis

Code Red Air over the Mid-Atlantic States

NASA imaged an aerosol shroud over much of the eastern United States during June 26-29 poor-air advisories and described it as potentially containing pollution and smoke.

See every retained source and limitation ↓

Sequence: Rochester (Jun 30) → Syracuse (Jun 30)

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

Open the evidence ledger ↓
  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Source not directly documented

    The catalog has a grouping hypothesis, but no retained source directly establishes the proposed cause.

    Open question
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    Transport into the affected region is documented

    NASA imaged an aerosol shroud over much of the eastern United States during June 26-29 poor-air advisories and described it as potentially containing pollution and smoke.

    View transport source ↗
    Documented
  3. 3

    Local response

    39.9 µg/m³ near Rochester

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 2 metros. The peak daily concentration is roughly 1.8 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Mixed causes” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

Rochester, NY

Monitor comparison window 2001-06-27 to 2001-07-03

4 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 39.3 µg/m³

7% above nearby days

Air movement 3.83 kt

54% higher than surrounding days

Carbon monoxide 0.392 ppm

About the same as surrounding days

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 39.3 µg/m³

7% higher than surrounding days

Before36.9 µg/m³ Event39.3 µg/m³ After8.50 µg/m³
2 monitors · 24 HOUR
Carbon monoxide 0.392 ppm

About the same as surrounding days

Before0.429 ppm Event0.392 ppm After0.285 ppm
2 monitors · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 5.19 ppb

11% lower than surrounding days

Before6.54 ppb Event5.19 ppb After5.85 ppb
2 monitors · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.075 ppm

91% higher than surrounding days

Before0.073 ppm Event0.075 ppm After0.025 ppm
2 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Atmospheric conditions

Nearby EPA weather observations
Humidity 64 %

About the same as surrounding days

Pressure 995 Millibars

About the same as surrounding days

Temperature 81.2 °F

8% higher than surrounding days

Wind 3.83 kt

54% higher than surrounding days

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Views from the selected metro

Camera views near

Browse the camera map →

Select a metro on the map to see nearby cameras. Where an operator archive reaches the event, drag the divider to compare two moments, adjust either date and time, or play the available event-day frames. Camera imagery is visual context, not an air-quality measurement or proof of smoke.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Rochester, NY 39.9 µg/m³ 1.8 Jun 30, 2001 #18 of its top days
Syracuse, NY 39.3 µg/m³ 1.8 Jun 30, 2001 #17 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

1 retained source

Official record

Code Red Air over the Mid-Atlantic States

NASA Earth Observatory

NASA imaged an aerosol shroud over much of the eastern United States during June 26-29 poor-air advisories and described it as potentially containing pollution and smoke.

What it supports

This source supports a possible mechanism or occurrence; it does not establish the cause by itself.

Limit

The source does not separate smoke from anthropogenic aerosol or prove surface attribution at every affected metro.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.