← Air events

Fireworks Possible

2025-01-01 San Diego-Carlsbad, CA fireworks episode

January 1, 2025

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 59.2 µg/m³ near San Diego across 1 covered metro home to 3.3 million people.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 2.1 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 7.0 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Why we think this happened

The basis for “Fireworks”

The event falls exactly in the versioned New Year or Independence Day window and no competing event-specific cause was recovered.

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

Inference, not direct attribution

Holiday timing: The event falls in the July 3–5 or December 31–January 1 fireworks window. That makes fireworks a reasonable hypothesis, but no retained source directly attributes this event.

Evidence path

From source to city

A cause is more convincing when the record connects three things: something happened, the air mass moved toward the region, and local instruments responded. Here is how much of that chain is documented for this event.

  1. 1

    Source or mechanism

    Pattern-based explanation

    Holiday timing. The event falls in the July 3–5 or December 31–January 1 fireworks window. That makes fireworks a reasonable hypothesis, but no retained source directly attributes this event.

    Inferred
  2. 2

    Air-mass movement

    The transport path has not been reconstructed

    The retained record does not yet show how air traveled from the proposed source to these metros. A trajectory replay or dated plume analysis belongs here.

    Research gap
  3. 3

    Local response

    59.2 µg/m³ near San Diego

    EPA monitors recorded the event across 1 metro. The peak daily concentration is roughly 2.7 cigarette-equivalents at the outdoor daily rate.

    Inspect the pollutant and weather signals ↓
    Documented

Event autopsy

What the instruments saw

Before, during, and after the episode: nearby pollutant monitors and surface-weather stations show what changed. This context tests the “Fireworks” explanation; it does not assign the cause by itself.

Observed context · not attribution

San Diego-Carlsbad, CA

Monitor comparison window 2024-12-29 to 2025-01-04 · PM2.5 target: San Ysidro

6 pollutant signals
Fine-particle pulse 21 µg/m³

74% above nearby days

PM10 43 µg/m³

43% higher than surrounding days

Pollution fingerprint

Metro-wide median of reporting monitors
PM2.5 21 µg/m³

74% higher than surrounding days

Before11.6 µg/m³ Event21 µg/m³ After15.5 µg/m³
10 monitors · 1 HOUR
PM10 43 µg/m³

43% higher than surrounding days

Before23.5 µg/m³ Event43 µg/m³ After33 µg/m³
8 monitors · 24-HR BLK AVG
Carbon monoxide 0.791 ppm

44% higher than surrounding days

Before0.518 ppm Event0.791 ppm After0.673 ppm
3 monitors · 1 HOUR
Nitrogen dioxide 12.7 ppb

32% higher than surrounding days

Before9.33 ppb Event12.7 ppb After16.1 ppb
9 monitors · 1 HOUR
Sulfur dioxide 0.238 ppb

85% higher than surrounding days

Before0.090 ppb Event0.238 ppb After0.267 ppb
1 monitor · 1 HOUR
Ozone 0.024 ppm

8% lower than surrounding days

Before0.026 ppm Event0.024 ppm After0.031 ppm
9 monitors · 8-HR RUN AVG BEGIN HOUR

Source: U.S. EPA AirData daily observations and, where available, nearby ASOS/AWOS surface observations. Values are descriptive medians over the retained monitor set; missing measurements remain missing. Transport and source evidence remain separate layers because this instrument pattern does not assign a cause by itself.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents
EPA monitors sit in metro areas, so the colour clusters there. Land between and beyond them is unmeasured, not clean: this map shows where IAQng has readings, not the extent of the smoke.

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
San Diego-Carlsbad, CA 59.2 µg/m³ 2.7 Jan 1, 2025 #24 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

Public evidence library

What supports this account

Each card states what a source supports—and what it does not. Official records, research, reporting, community observations, and transparent inferences remain visibly different kinds of evidence.

1 retained source

Transparent inference

Holiday timing pattern

IAQng deterministic inference policy

The event peak falls on 2025-01-01 and the event lasts no more than two days. Under holiday_fireworks_possible.v1, that timing is consistent with a possible fireworks contribution.

What it supports

A possible fireworks contribution; this is a reproducible inference, not direct occurrence or causal evidence.

Limit

Pre-event and post-event temporal-shape data were not supplied.

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Possible This is a transparent hypothesis supported by limited evidence or an explicit inference, not a definitive attribution.

This episode was grouped from the monitor record by the catalog pipeline and given its cause from the evidence listed above. It has not been individually reviewed and signed off, so its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence accumulates. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula. If it is wrong, tell us.